org.kernel.vger.linux-assembly archive

418 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 5). Latest articles →

RE: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: add __READ_ONCE_EX()
Mon, 8 Apr 2024 14:51:13 +0000
David Laight <[email protected]> • #1507
Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: cpuidle: Add arm_poll_idle
Fri, 05 Apr 2024 13:22:27 -0700
Ankur Arora <[email protected]> • #1506
Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: cpuidle: Add arm_poll_idle
Fri, 5 Apr 2024 20:05:45 +0000
"Okanovic, Haris" <[email protected]> • #1505
Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: cpuidle: Add arm_poll_idle
Fri, 5 Apr 2024 19:36:44 +0000
"Okanovic, Haris" <[email protected]> • #1504
Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: cpuidle: Add arm_poll_idle
Tue, 02 Apr 2024 16:17:10 -0700
Ankur Arora <[email protected]> • #1503
Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: cpuidle: Add arm_poll_idle
Tue, 2 Apr 2024 18:23:05 +0100
Mark Rutland <[email protected]> • #1502
Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: add __READ_ONCE_EX()
Tue, 2 Apr 2024 17:48:46 +0100
Mark Rutland <[email protected]> • #1501
Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: cpuidle: Add arm_poll_idle
Tue, 2 Apr 2024 02:30:23 +0000
"Okanovic, Haris" <[email protected]> • #1500
[PATCH 3/3] arm64: cpuidle: Add arm_poll_idle
Mon, 1 Apr 2024 20:47:06 -0500
Haris Okanovic <[email protected]> • #1499
[PATCH 2/3] arm64: add __READ_ONCE_EX()
Mon, 1 Apr 2024 20:47:05 -0500
Haris Okanovic <[email protected]> • #1498
[PATCH 1/3] arm64: Add TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG
Mon, 1 Apr 2024 20:47:04 -0500
Haris Okanovic <[email protected]> • #1497
PSA: this list has been migrated (no action required)
Mon, 6 Nov 2023 19:00:52 -0500
Konstantin Ryabitsev <[email protected]> • #1496
Re: Need Help: Why there are two local labels "1:" in arch/x86/boot/header.S
Mon, 12 Sep 2022 21:16:04 -0700
Brian Raiter <[email protected]> • #1495
Need Help: Why there are two local labels "1:" in arch/x86/boot/header.S
Tue, 13 Sep 2022 03:57:48 +0000
liu hang <[email protected]> • #1494
Re: [PATCH v4] hwmon: (dell-smm) Improve assembly code
Mon, 20 Jun 2022 08:21:10 -0700
Guenter Roeck <[email protected]> • #1493
Re: [PATCH v4] hwmon: (dell-smm) Improve assembly code
Wed, 2 Mar 2022 10:07:39 -0800
Guenter Roeck <[email protected]> • #1492
Re: [PATCH v4] hwmon: (dell-smm) Improve assembly code
Wed, 23 Feb 2022 16:45:27 -0800
Guenter Roeck <[email protected]> • #1491
RE: [PATCH v4] hwmon: (dell-smm) Improve assembly code
Wed, 23 Feb 2022 22:35:11 +0000
David Laight <[email protected]> • #1490
Re: [PATCH v4] hwmon: (dell-smm) Improve assembly code
Wed, 23 Feb 2022 22:39:00 +0100
Armin Wolf <[email protected]> • #1489
RE: [PATCH v4] hwmon: (dell-smm) Improve assembly code
Tue, 22 Feb 2022 19:46:53 +0000
David Laight <[email protected]> • #1488
Re: [PATCH v4] hwmon: (dell-smm) Improve assembly code
Tue, 22 Feb 2022 18:51:50 +0100
Pali Rohár <[email protected]> • #1487
Re: [PATCH v4] hwmon: (dell-smm) Improve assembly code
Tue, 22 Feb 2022 08:54:32 -0800
Guenter Roeck <[email protected]> • #1486
[PATCH v4] hwmon: (dell-smm) Improve assembly code
Sun, 20 Feb 2022 20:08:51 +0100
Armin Wolf <[email protected]> • #1485
Re: [PATCH v2] hwmon: (dell-smm) Improve assembly code
Sun, 20 Feb 2022 20:05:17 +0100
Armin Wolf <[email protected]> • #1484
RE: [PATCH v2] hwmon: (dell-smm) Improve assembly code
Sun, 20 Feb 2022 18:48:58 +0000
David Laight <[email protected]> • #1483
RE: [PATCH v2] hwmon: (dell-smm) Improve assembly code
Sun, 20 Feb 2022 18:03:15 +0000
David Laight <[email protected]> • #1482
[PATCH v3] hwmon: (dell-smm) Improve assembly code
Sun, 20 Feb 2022 17:25:01 +0100
Armin Wolf <[email protected]> • #1481
Re: [PATCH v2] hwmon: (dell-smm) Improve assembly code
Sun, 20 Feb 2022 07:30:01 -0800
Guenter Roeck <[email protected]> • #1480
RE: [PATCH v2] hwmon: (dell-smm) Improve assembly code
Sun, 20 Feb 2022 12:20:13 +0000
David Laight <[email protected]> • #1479
[PATCH v2] hwmon: (dell-smm) Improve assembly code
Sat, 19 Feb 2022 22:10:11 +0100
Armin Wolf <[email protected]> • #1478
RE: simple hello.asm (NASM) not compile in x64, plz help
Wed, 24 Dec 2014 19:49:10 +0000
Robert Plantz <[email protected]> • #1477
need help on assembly book's example(intel on win/dos 32/16bit)
Tue, 23 Dec 2014 21:26:38 -0800
"eric lin" <[email protected]> • #1476
simple hello.asm (NASM) not compile in x64, plz help
Sat, 29 Nov 2014 05:20:26 -0500
"Charles T. Bell" <[email protected]> • #1475
Re: simple hello.asm (NASM) not compile in x64, plz help
Fri, 28 Nov 2014 21:26:56 -0800
Brian Raiter <[email protected]> • #1474
simple hello.asm (NASM) not compile in x64, plz help
Fri, 28 Nov 2014 20:35:37 -0800
"eric lin" <[email protected]> • #1473
Re: [self introduction] new to this mailing list so I introducing myself. please welcome me :D
Tue, 18 Nov 2014 13:26:16 +0100
abdallah issam <[email protected]> • #1472
[self introduction] new to this mailing list so I introducing myself. please welcome me :D
Tue, 18 Nov 2014 15:11:47 +0900
김태윤 <[email protected]> • #1471
Re: Need help doing a jmp rather than a call
Sat, 9 Nov 2013 18:01:01 -0600
Blake McBride <[email protected]> • #1470
Re: Need help doing a jmp rather than a call
Sat, 9 Nov 2013 16:47:14 -0600
Blake McBride <[email protected]> • #1469
Re: Need help doing a jmp rather than a call
Sat, 9 Nov 2013 21:30:23 +0000
Rob <[email protected]> • #1468
Re: Need help doing a jmp rather than a call
Sat, 9 Nov 2013 10:19:52 -0600
Blake McBride <[email protected]> • #1467
Re: Need help doing a jmp rather than a call
Sat, 9 Nov 2013 14:42:46 +0000
Rob <[email protected]> • #1466
Re: Need help doing a jmp rather than a call
Sat, 9 Nov 2013 08:13:13 -0600
Blake McBride <[email protected]> • #1465
Re: Need help doing a jmp rather than a call
Sat, 9 Nov 2013 12:00:14 +0100
Sofiane Akermoun <[email protected]> • #1464
Re: Need help doing a jmp rather than a call
Sat, 9 Nov 2013 11:57:38 +0100
Sofiane Akermoun <[email protected]> • #1463
Re: Need help doing a jmp rather than a call
Sat, 9 Nov 2013 02:21:31 -0600
Blake McBride <[email protected]> • #1462
Re: Need help doing a jmp rather than a call
Sat, 9 Nov 2013 07:19:34 +0100
Sofiane Akermoun <[email protected]> • #1461
Need help doing a jmp rather than a call
Fri, 8 Nov 2013 21:02:54 -0600
Blake McBride <[email protected]> • #1460
Re: how does ld.so call ELF's entry?
Sun, 7 Apr 2013 09:47:59 +0200
Sofiane Akermoun <[email protected]> • #1459
Re: how does ld.so call ELF's entry?
Sun, 7 Apr 2013 14:56:58 +0800
ishare <[email protected]> • #1458
Re: how does ld.so call ELF's entry?
Sun, 7 Apr 2013 08:26:14 +0200
Sofiane Akermoun <[email protected]> • #1457
Re: how does ld.so call ELF's entry?
Sun, 7 Apr 2013 12:52:07 +0800
ishare <[email protected]> • #1456
Re: how does ld.so call ELF's entry?
Sun, 7 Apr 2013 06:45:58 +0200
Sofiane Akermoun <[email protected]> • #1455
Re: how does ld.so call ELF's entry?
Sun, 7 Apr 2013 06:40:30 +0200
Sofiane Akermoun <[email protected]> • #1454
Re: how does ld.so call ELF's entry?
Sun, 7 Apr 2013 11:45:54 +0800
ishare <[email protected]> • #1453
Re: how does ld.so call ELF's entry?
Sat, 6 Apr 2013 20:43:16 -0700
Chris Evans <[email protected]> • #1452
Re: how does ld.so call ELF's entry?
Sun, 7 Apr 2013 11:39:13 +0800
ishare <[email protected]> • #1451
Re: how does ld.so call ELF's entry?
Sun, 7 Apr 2013 05:13:37 +0200
Sofiane Akermoun <[email protected]> • #1450
how does ld.so call ELF's entry?
Sun, 7 Apr 2013 10:19:21 +0800
ishare <[email protected]> • #1449
Re: how to disassembly a specified section
Mon, 18 Mar 2013 16:31:58 +0100
Sofiane Akermoun <[email protected]> • #1448
how to disassembly a specified section
Mon, 18 Mar 2013 22:52:23 +0800
ishare <[email protected]> • #1447
Re: [NASM] ROR -> error: invalid combination of opcode and operands
Mon, 11 Mar 2013 23:40:05 +0100
Sofiane Akermoun <[email protected]> • #1446
Re: [NASM] ROR -> error: invalid combination of opcode and operands
Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:22:30 -0700
Chris Evans <[email protected]> • #1445
[NASM] ROR -> error: invalid combination of opcode and operands
Mon, 11 Mar 2013 23:09:13 +0100
Meher Assel <[email protected]> • #1444
RE: how to use .section command in asm code?
Mon, 4 Mar 2013 15:31:35 +0000
Robert Plantz <[email protected]> • #1443
Re: what does this do ?
Mon, 4 Mar 2013 07:07:29 +0100
Sofiane Akermoun <[email protected]> • #1442
Re: how to use .section command in asm code?
Mon, 4 Mar 2013 07:06:36 +0100
Sofiane Akermoun <[email protected]> • #1441
how to use .section command in asm code?
Mon, 4 Mar 2013 03:50:50 +0800
ishare <[email protected]> • #1440
what does this do ?
Mon, 4 Mar 2013 01:21:04 +0800
ishare <[email protected]> • #1439
Re: different asm code
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:54:19 +0100
Sofiane Akermoun <[email protected]> • #1438
Re: different asm code
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:22:32 +0200
Hendrik Visage <[email protected]> • #1437
different asm code
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 13:06:30 +0800
horseriver <[email protected]> • #1436
gdtr value
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 09:53:30 +0800
horseriver <[email protected]> • #1435
what does this do?
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 04:46:51 +0800
horseriver <[email protected]> • #1434
Re: varibles define
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 02:21:51 +0100
Sofiane Akermoun <[email protected]> • #1433
Re: .word _XY_
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 02:21:06 +0100
Sofiane Akermoun <[email protected]> • #1432
varibles define
Wed, 13 Feb 2013 12:34:45 +0800
horseriver <[email protected]> • #1431
.word _XY_
Tue, 12 Feb 2013 15:15:10 +0800
horseriver <[email protected]> • #1430
RE: mov instruction
Fri, 8 Feb 2013 20:30:42 +0000
Robert Plantz <[email protected]> • #1429
Re: mov instruction
Thu, 7 Feb 2013 12:32:57 +0800
horseriver <[email protected]> • #1428
Re: mov instruction
Thu, 7 Feb 2013 15:57:37 +0200
Hendrik Visage <[email protected]> • #1427
mov instruction
Thu, 7 Feb 2013 11:57:14 +0800
horseriver <[email protected]> • #1426
re: Disassembly of 00000
Tue, 5 Feb 2013 00:54:09 +0200
Hendrik Visage <[email protected]> • #1425
Re: Disassembly of 00000
Mon, 4 Feb 2013 20:25:34 +0100
Sofiane Akermoun <[email protected]> • #1424
Re: Disassembly of 00000
Mon, 4 Feb 2013 14:24:58 +0800
horseriver <[email protected]> • #1423
RE: Disassembly of 00000
Sun, 3 Feb 2013 16:42:35 +0000
Robert Plantz <[email protected]> • #1422
Re: Disassembly of 00000
Sun, 3 Feb 2013 06:44:00 +0100
Sofiane Akermoun <[email protected]> • #1421
Re: Disassembly of 00000
Sun, 3 Feb 2013 02:54:40 +0800
horseriver <[email protected]> • #1420
Re: Disassembly of 00000
Sat, 2 Feb 2013 10:37:32 -0800
Brian Raiter <[email protected]> • #1419
Disassembly of 00000
Sat, 2 Feb 2013 12:53:39 +0800
horseriver <[email protected]> • #1418
[PATCH] asmutils-0.18 (basename.asm): bugfixes
Sun, 9 Dec 2012 13:46:54 +0100
Cojocaru Alexandru <[email protected]> • #1417
Re: [RFC PATCH v2] ARM hardcoded instruction causes cpu-hotplug fail to work on big-endian platfrom
Mon, 22 Oct 2012 19:01:00 +0800
Fei Yang <[email protected]> • #1416
Re: [RFC PATCH v2] Hardcoded instruction causes cpu-hotplug fail on be8 big-endian ARM platfrom
Wed, 17 Oct 2012 20:00:51 +0800
Fei Yang <[email protected]> • #1415
Re: [PATCH] Re: Hardcoded instruction causes certain features to fail on ARM platfrom due to endianness
Tue, 16 Oct 2012 18:25:15 +0100
Dave Martin <[email protected]> • #1414
Re: [PATCH] Re: Hardcoded instruction causes certain features to fail on ARM platfrom due to endianness
Wed, 17 Oct 2012 00:33:54 +0800
Fei Yang <[email protected]> • #1413
Re: [PATCH] Re: Hardcoded instruction causes certain features to fail on ARM platfrom due to endianness
Tue, 16 Oct 2012 13:49:56 +0100
Dave Martin <[email protected]> • #1412
[PATCH] Re: Hardcoded instruction causes certain features to fail on ARM platfrom due to endianness
Mon, 15 Oct 2012 23:33:08 +0800
Fei Yang <[email protected]> • #1411
Re: Hardcoded instruction causes certain features to fail on ARM platfrom due to endianness
Mon, 15 Oct 2012 09:28:15 +0200
Mikael Pettersson <[email protected]> • #1410
Hardcoded instruction causes certain features to fail on ARM platfrom due to endianness
Mon, 15 Oct 2012 03:46:47 +0000
"Yangfei (Felix)" <[email protected]> • #1409
[Question] X86 Disassembler Engine Patches -- 3 questions
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 15:32:20 +0800
Chen Gang <[email protected]> • #1408
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.