org.kernel.vger.linux-numa archive

393 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 4). Latest articles →

PSA: this list has moved to new vger infra (no action required)
Mon, 20 Nov 2023 19:50:27 -0500
Konstantin Ryabitsev <[email protected]> • #949
Re: utility for numa placement of POSIX shared memory segments
Tue, 18 Jan 2022 13:23:16 -0800
Andi Kleen <[email protected]> • #948
Re: utility for numa placement of POSIX shared memory segments
Mon, 17 Jan 2022 09:04:36 +0100
Andreas Grapentin <[email protected]> • #947
Re: utility for numa placement of POSIX shared memory segments
Sat, 15 Jan 2022 08:09:48 -0800
Andi Kleen <[email protected]> • #946
Re: utility for numa placement of POSIX shared memory segments
Sat, 15 Jan 2022 11:05:42 +0100
Andreas Grapentin <[email protected]> • #945
libnuma/numactl 2.0.14 available
Thu, 17 Sep 2020 20:29:54 -0700
Filipe Brandenburger <[email protected]> • #944
Reusing NUMA Subsystem
Sun, 5 Jul 2020 02:10:10 +0430
Ahmad Nouralizadeh <[email protected]> • #943
[ruab] Re: (2) linux-pci@vg er.kernel.org The base of b usinessmen from all over th e world. / База бизнесменов со всего Мира.
Mon, 16 Jul 2018 17:32:03 +0400
"Kord" <[email protected]> • #942
Re:(6) [email protected] ernel.org E-mail database f or $10 per country / E-mail базы по $10 за страну...
Thu, 25 Jan 2018 02:18:43 +0400
"Business Group (rgmgxodf)" <[email protected]> • #941
Several calls to set_mempolicy and heap consistency
Thu, 8 Jun 2017 17:05:43 +0300
Serge Ayoun <[email protected]> • #940
Re: [PATCH] numastat: fix bad column calculation in show_process_info
Thu, 25 May 2017 11:30:27 -0700
Andi Kleen <[email protected]> • #939
[PATCH] numastat: fix bad column calculation in show_process_info
Thu, 25 May 2017 13:36:32 +0200
Petr Oros <[email protected]> • #938
Re: Missing include in mbind(2) and set_mempolicy(2) manpages?
Wed, 19 Apr 2017 15:28:16 +0200
"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <[email protected]> • #937
PPC64/libnuma: getting the total number of numa nodes in the system
Wed, 22 Feb 2017 15:53:51 -0300
Gustavo Romero <[email protected]> • #936
[PATCH] Segment fault when numa nodes not sequential or contiguous
Tue, 14 Feb 2017 13:43:08 +0530
Seeteena Thoufeek <[email protected]> • #935
Re: Missing include in mbind(2) and set_mempolicy(2) manpages?
Mon, 23 Jan 2017 12:57:43 +1300
"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <[email protected]> • #934
Missing include in mbind(2) and set_mempolicy(2) manpages?
Wed, 18 Jan 2017 13:05:17 +0100
Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]> • #933
[PATCH] Segment fault when numa nodes not sequential or contiguous
Wed, 21 Dec 2016 12:48:11 +0530
Seeteena Thoufeek <[email protected]> • #932
RE: Kernel crashes in __migration_entry_wait
Mon, 28 Nov 2016 12:46:52 +0000
Dashi DS1 Cao <[email protected]> • #931
RE: Kernel crashes in __migration_entry_wait
Mon, 14 Nov 2016 11:19:49 +0000
"Odzioba, Lukasz" <[email protected]> • #930
Kernel crashes in __migration_entry_wait
Sun, 13 Nov 2016 12:39:38 +0000
Dashi DS1 Cao <[email protected]> • #929
Protection Fault in __migration_entry_wait
Fri, 11 Nov 2016 03:10:42 +0000
Dashi DS1 Cao <[email protected]> • #928
[PATCH 1/1] numastat: fix memory overwrite with -p <pid>
Tue, 2 Aug 2016 13:19:06 +1000
Sam Bobroff <[email protected]> • #927
[PATCH] include sys/sysmacros.h for major/minor
Mon, 18 Apr 2016 18:57:14 -0400
Mike Frysinger <[email protected]> • #926
[PATCH] fix building as PIEs on x86
Mon, 18 Apr 2016 18:56:22 -0400
Mike Frysinger <[email protected]> • #925
Re: Why I don't see Node 0 when running numstat on one specific F23 server
Sat, 16 Apr 2016 13:19:32 +0300
Kevin Wilson <[email protected]> • #924
Re: Why I don't see Node 0 when running numstat on one specific F23 server
Mon, 28 Mar 2016 13:42:09 -0700 (PDT)
David Rientjes <[email protected]> • #923
Why I don't see Node 0 when running numstat on one specific F23 server
Sun, 27 Mar 2016 17:30:48 +0300
Kevin Wilson <[email protected]> • #922
Re: Build failure on armhf
Thu, 21 Jan 2016 21:12:44 +0100
Andreas Enge <[email protected]> • #921
Re: Build failure on armhf
Wed, 30 Dec 2015 20:45:04 +0100
Andi Kleen <[email protected]> • #920
Re: Build failure on armhf
Wed, 30 Dec 2015 09:06:46 -0800
Filipe Brandenburger <[email protected]> • #919
Re: Build failure on armhf
Tue, 15 Dec 2015 09:56:34 +0100
Andreas Enge <[email protected]> • #918
Build failure on armhf
Sat, 12 Dec 2015 14:57:21 +0100
Andreas Enge <[email protected]> • #917
Re: Missing configure
Sat, 12 Dec 2015 10:31:21 +0100
Andreas Enge <[email protected]> • #916
Re: Missing configure
Fri, 11 Dec 2015 07:50:07 -0800
Filipe Brandenburger <[email protected]> • #915
Re: [PATCH] libnuma: supress warnings for non-existing node
Fri, 11 Dec 2015 07:48:14 -0800
Filipe Brandenburger <[email protected]> • #914
2.0.11 release if libnuma/numactl
Fri, 11 Dec 2015 07:47:59 -0800
Filipe Brandenburger <[email protected]> • #913
Missing configure
Tue, 8 Dec 2015 23:04:56 +0100
Andreas Enge <[email protected]> • #912
[PATCH] libnuma: supress warnings for non-existing node
Mon, 7 Dec 2015 15:32:29 +0100
Petr Holasek <[email protected]> • #911
[PATCH] Subject: [PATCH] /sys not mounted on non sequential cpus list
Thu, 19 Nov 2015 12:41:16 +0100
Thierry Fauck <[email protected]> • #910
Re: [PATCH v2] openvswitch: allocate nr_node_ids flow_stats instead of num_possible_nodes
Tue, 21 Jul 2015 22:26:48 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller <[email protected]> • #909
Re: [PATCH] openvswitch: make for_each_node loops work with sparse numa systems
Tue, 21 Jul 2015 15:04:30 -0700
Nishanth Aravamudan <[email protected]> • #908
Re: [PATCH v2] openvswitch: allocate nr_node_ids flow_stats instead of num_possible_nodes
Tue, 21 Jul 2015 15:02:22 -0700
Nishanth Aravamudan <[email protected]> • #907
Re: [PATCH v2] openvswitch: allocate nr_node_ids flow_stats instead of num_possible_nodes
Tue, 21 Jul 2015 11:29:56 -0700
Pravin Shelar <[email protected]> • #906
[PATCH v2] openvswitch: allocate nr_node_ids flow_stats instead of num_possible_nodes
Tue, 21 Jul 2015 12:36:33 -0500
Chris J Arges <[email protected]> • #905
Re: [PATCH] openvswitch: make for_each_node loops work with sparse numa systems
Tue, 21 Jul 2015 11:30:58 -0500
Chris J Arges <[email protected]> • #904
Re: [PATCH] openvswitch: make for_each_node loops work with sparse numa systems
Tue, 21 Jul 2015 09:24:18 -0700
Nishanth Aravamudan <[email protected]> • #903
[PATCH] openvswitch: make for_each_node loops work with sparse numa systems
Tue, 21 Jul 2015 10:32:34 -0500
Chris J Arges <[email protected]> • #902
[PATCH] libnuma: don't cache node cpumasks older than 1 second
Thu, 18 Jun 2015 15:48:41 +0200
Petr Holasek <[email protected]> • #901
Re: [PATCH] libnuma: disable caching of node cpusmasks
Tue, 16 Jun 2015 16:48:05 +0200
Andi Kleen <[email protected]> • #900
Re: [PATCH] libnuma: disable caching of node cpusmasks
Tue, 16 Jun 2015 16:40:53 +0200
Petr Holasek <[email protected]> • #899
Re: [PATCH] libnuma: disable caching of node cpusmasks
Fri, 12 Jun 2015 17:30:01 +0200
Andi Kleen <[email protected]> • #898
[PATCH] libnuma: disable caching of node cpusmasks
Fri, 12 Jun 2015 17:16:12 +0200
Petr Holasek <[email protected]> • #897
Re: [PATCH] fix numactl test
Tue, 5 May 2015 08:55:44 -0700
Filipe Brandenburger <[email protected]> • #896
Re: [PATCH] fix numactl test
Tue, 05 May 2015 00:32:39 -0400
"Rick \"Zero_Chaos\" Farina" <[email protected]> • #895
Re: [PATCH] fix numactl test
Mon, 4 May 2015 13:29:38 -0700
Filipe Brandenburger <[email protected]> • #894
[PATCH] fix numactl test
Sun, 03 May 2015 22:35:33 -0400
"Rick \"Zero_Chaos\" Farina" <[email protected]> • #893
Re: First-Touch policy on NUMA: some pages on the wrong node
Wed, 18 Mar 2015 15:43:15 -0700 (PDT)
David Rientjes <[email protected]> • #892
First-Touch policy on NUMA: some pages on the wrong node
Wed, 18 Mar 2015 14:56:11 +0100
Andreas Hollmann <[email protected]> • #891
[Question] cpu<->node relationship changed with node online/offline
Mon, 2 Mar 2015 09:43:30 +0800
Gu Zheng <[email protected]> • #890
numaplace tool
Tue, 24 Feb 2015 11:31:17 +0800
Daniel J Blueman <[email protected]> • #889
Re: [PATCH] Fix a SEGV due to uninitialised mask
Wed, 18 Feb 2015 13:39:09 -0800
Filipe Brandenburger <[email protected]> • #888
[PATCH] Fix a SEGV due to uninitialised mask
Tue, 17 Feb 2015 12:06:51 +0800
Daniel J Blueman <[email protected]> • #887
NUMA page migration: blocking or non-blocking?
Thu, 22 Jan 2015 17:50:28 -0200
Martin Ichilevici de Oliveira <[email protected]> • #886
Re: [PATCH] libnuma: add check for return value of numa_node_to_cpus
Mon, 19 Jan 2015 10:44:16 -0600
Cliff Wickman <[email protected]> • #885
[PATCH] libnuma: add check for return value of numa_node_to_cpus
Wed, 14 Jan 2015 09:53:47 +0100
Petr Holasek <[email protected]> • #884
Re: Memory latency tests on NUMA
Sun, 14 Dec 2014 06:10:09 -1000
Chris Worley <[email protected]> • #883
Memory latency tests on NUMA
Sat, 13 Dec 2014 17:30:20 -0800
Ganapatrao Kulkarni <[email protected]> • #882
Re: Interleaved allocation
Thu, 11 Dec 2014 23:49:23 -0200
Martin Ichilevici de Oliveira <[email protected]> • #881
Re: Interleaved allocation
Tue, 09 Dec 2014 14:03:16 -0800
Andi Kleen <[email protected]> • #880
[PATCH] libnuma_node_not_sequential libnuma.so function numa_node_of_cpu() doesn't use previously created list of valid nodes but use the entire array indexed with the maximum number of nodes available on the system. Fix is to check node is valid before calling numa_node_to_cpus_v2_int() which check that the cpu belongs to that node. .
Tue, 9 Dec 2014 16:56:07 +0100
Thierry FAUCK - IBM LTC <[email protected]> • #879
Interleaved allocation
Mon, 8 Dec 2014 17:14:28 -0200
Martin Ichilevici de Oliveira <[email protected]> • #878
Memory policy change handling and callbacks for a new HW feature
Wed, 26 Nov 2014 15:12:39 +0000 (UTC)
Serge A <[email protected]> • #877
Re: Some performance figure questions.
Tue, 25 Nov 2014 23:42:44 +0100
Andreas Hollmann <[email protected]> • #876
Re: Some performance figure questions.
Tue, 25 Nov 2014 18:35:32 +0100
Andreas Hollmann <[email protected]> • #875
Some performance figure questions.
Tue, 25 Nov 2014 15:11:56 +0000 (UTC)
Serge A <[email protected]> • #874
Re: numa_alloc_onnode does not allocate on node passed as argument
Tue, 4 Nov 2014 22:23:51 -0500
Elena Ufimtseva <[email protected]> • #873
Re: numa_alloc_onnode does not allocate on node passed as argument
Fri, 31 Oct 2014 11:35:22 +0100
Andreas Hollmann <[email protected]> • #872
Re: numa_alloc_onnode does not allocate on node passed as argument
Fri, 31 Oct 2014 11:34:33 +0100
Andreas Hollmann <[email protected]> • #871
Re: numa_alloc_onnode does not allocate on node passed as argument
Thu, 30 Oct 2014 16:21:11 -0700
Andres Nötzli <[email protected]> • #870
Re: numa_alloc_onnode does not allocate on node passed as argument
Thu, 30 Oct 2014 00:33:02 -0400
Elena Ufimtseva <[email protected]> • #869
Re: NUMA balancing degrading performance
Wed, 29 Oct 2014 00:37:36 -0200
Martin Ichilevici de Oliveira <[email protected]> • #868
Re: NUMA balancing degrading performance
Tue, 28 Oct 2014 22:57:37 +0100
Andreas Hollmann <[email protected]> • #867
Re: NUMA balancing degrading performance
Mon, 27 Oct 2014 19:27:34 -0200
Martin Ichilevici de Oliveira <[email protected]> • #866
NUMA balancing degrading performance
Mon, 27 Oct 2014 16:07:03 -0200
Martin Ichilevici de Oliveira <[email protected]> • #865
Re: numa_alloc_onnode does not allocate on node passed as argument
Thu, 23 Oct 2014 10:17:23 -0700
Andres Nötzli <[email protected]> • #864
Re: numa_alloc_onnode does not allocate on node passed as argument
Thu, 23 Oct 2014 09:15:45 -0400
Elena Ufimtseva <[email protected]> • #863
Re: numa_alloc_onnode does not allocate on node passed as argument
Wed, 22 Oct 2014 09:40:37 -0700
Andres Nötzli <[email protected]> • #862
Re: numa_alloc_onnode does not allocate on node passed as argument
Wed, 22 Oct 2014 09:12:38 -0400
Elena Ufimtseva <[email protected]> • #861
numa_alloc_onnode does not allocate on node passed as argument
Tue, 21 Oct 2014 20:47:19 -0700
Andres Nötzli <[email protected]> • #860
2.0.10 release of libnuma/numactl
Mon, 6 Oct 2014 08:08:47 -0500
Cliff Wickman <[email protected]> • #859
Re: tshared fails
Mon, 22 Sep 2014 14:12:16 +0530
Ganapatrao Kulkarni <[email protected]> • #858
tshared fails
Mon, 22 Sep 2014 09:35:08 +0530
Ganapatrao Kulkarni <[email protected]> • #857
Re: move_pages fails on 2 node system
Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:26:31 -0700 (PDT)
David Rientjes <[email protected]> • #856
Re: move_pages fails on 2 node system
Wed, 17 Sep 2014 09:01:09 +0530
Ganapatrao Kulkarni <[email protected]> • #855
Re: move_pages fails on 2 node system
Tue, 16 Sep 2014 15:38:38 -0700 (PDT)
David Rientjes <[email protected]> • #854
Re: move_pages fails on 2 node system
Tue, 16 Sep 2014 15:13:15 -0700
Filipe Brandenburger <[email protected]> • #853
Re: move_pages fails on 2 node system
Tue, 16 Sep 2014 13:22:51 -0700 (PDT)
David Rientjes <[email protected]> • #852
move_pages fails on 2 node system
Tue, 16 Sep 2014 15:28:43 +0530
Ganapatrao Kulkarni <[email protected]> • #851
Fwd: memleak with node_cpu_mask_v2;
Tue, 12 Aug 2014 10:15:23 +0200
Irsa Lobard <[email protected]> • #850
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.