org.kernel.vger.xdp-newbies archive

415 archived articles, newest first (page 4 of 5). Latest articles →

Re: Pause and unpause queue
Sat, 07 Jan 2023 19:47:04 +0100
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <[email protected]> • #2318
Re: Pause and unpause queue
Sat, 7 Jan 2023 10:24:27 -0800
Dave Taht <[email protected]> • #2317
Re: Pause and unpause queue
Sat, 7 Jan 2023 10:04:48 -0800
team lnx <[email protected]> • #2316
Re: Pause and unpause queue
Fri, 06 Jan 2023 14:00:32 +0100
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <[email protected]> • #2315
Pause and unpause queue
Thu, 5 Jan 2023 19:00:44 -0800
team lnx <[email protected]> • #2314
Re: Redirect packet back to host stack after AF_XDP?
Mon, 02 Jan 2023 12:33:48 +0100
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <[email protected]> • #2313
Re: Is It Possible to RX/Process/TX packets concurrently with AF_XDP?
Fri, 30 Dec 2022 21:31:59 +0000
Zhaoxi Zhu <[email protected]> • #2312
Re: Is It Possible to RX/Process/TX packets concurrently with AF_XDP?
Thu, 29 Dec 2022 11:18:26 +0100
Magnus Karlsson <[email protected]> • #2311
Re: Is It Possible to RX/Process/TX packets concurrently with AF_XDP?
Thu, 29 Dec 2022 01:07:34 +0000
Zhaoxi Zhu <[email protected]> • #2310
mlx5 AF_XDP busy polling
Fri, 23 Dec 2022 15:16:32 +0100
Federico Parola <[email protected]> • #2309
Re: Is It Possible to RX/Process/TX packets concurrently with AF_XDP?
Thu, 22 Dec 2022 10:38:02 +0100
Magnus Karlsson <[email protected]> • #2308
Re: Is It Possible to RX/Process/TX packets concurrently with AF_XDP?
Wed, 21 Dec 2022 23:11:05 +0000
Zhaoxi Zhu <[email protected]> • #2307
BTF error - 6.1 kernel
Mon, 19 Dec 2022 22:20:15 -0800
team lnx <[email protected]> • #2306
Re: xdp forward issue
Mon, 19 Dec 2022 20:22:57 -0800
team lnx <[email protected]> • #2305
Re: Why choosing AF_XDP (busy polling) over DPDK
Mon, 19 Dec 2022 08:41:23 +0100
Federico Parola <[email protected]> • #2304
Re: Redirect packet back to host stack after AF_XDP?
Fri, 16 Dec 2022 18:52:49 -0800
Vincent Li <[email protected]> • #2303
Re: XDP and AF_XDP performance comparison
Fri, 16 Dec 2022 16:11:40 +0100
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <[email protected]> • #2302
Re: Redirect packet back to host stack after AF_XDP?
Thu, 15 Dec 2022 10:52:55 -0800
Vincent Li <[email protected]> • #2301
Re: Potential ICE driver bug when returning XDP_TX with multiple channels
Thu, 15 Dec 2022 18:27:30 +0100
Maciej Fijalkowski <[email protected]> • #2300
Re: Redirect packet back to host stack after AF_XDP?
Thu, 15 Dec 2022 12:08:55 +0100
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <[email protected]> • #2299
Re: Redirect packet back to host stack after AF_XDP?
Wed, 14 Dec 2022 17:57:26 -0800
Vincent Li <[email protected]> • #2298
Re: Redirect packet back to host stack after AF_XDP?
Wed, 14 Dec 2022 23:53:39 +0100
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <[email protected]> • #2297
Re: Is It Possible to RX/Process/TX packets concurrently with AF_XDP?
Wed, 14 Dec 2022 21:26:35 +0000
Zhaoxi Zhu <[email protected]> • #2296
Redirect packet back to host stack after AF_XDP?
Wed, 14 Dec 2022 12:49:31 -0800
Vincent Li <[email protected]> • #2295
Re: Is It Possible to RX/Process/TX packets concurrently with AF_XDP?
Wed, 14 Dec 2022 12:40:28 -0800
Vincent Li <[email protected]> • #2294
Re: Why choosing AF_XDP (busy polling) over DPDK
Wed, 14 Dec 2022 20:46:07 +0100
Andrey Slastenov <[email protected]> • #2293
Re: Why choosing AF_XDP (busy polling) over DPDK
Wed, 14 Dec 2022 16:31:25 +0100
Magnus Karlsson <[email protected]> • #2292
Re: Why choosing AF_XDP (busy polling) over DPDK
Wed, 14 Dec 2022 16:16:09 +0100
Federico Parola <[email protected]> • #2291
Re: Why choosing AF_XDP (busy polling) over DPDK
Wed, 14 Dec 2022 10:00:21 +0100
Magnus Karlsson <[email protected]> • #2290
Why choosing AF_XDP (busy polling) over DPDK
Wed, 14 Dec 2022 09:08:15 +0100
Federico Parola <[email protected]> • #2289
Re: Is It Possible to RX/Process/TX packets concurrently with AF_XDP?
Wed, 14 Dec 2022 08:38:31 +0100
Magnus Karlsson <[email protected]> • #2288
Re: Is It Possible to RX/Process/TX packets concurrently with AF_XDP?
Tue, 13 Dec 2022 19:11:50 +0000
Zhaoxi Zhu <[email protected]> • #2287
Re: Is It Possible to RX/Process/TX packets concurrently with AF_XDP?
Thu, 8 Dec 2022 11:54:37 +0100
Magnus Karlsson <[email protected]> • #2286
Is It Possible to RX/Process/TX packets concurrently with AF_XDP?
Wed, 7 Dec 2022 22:48:54 +0000
Zhaoxi Zhu <[email protected]> • #2285
Re: xdp forward issue
Tue, 6 Dec 2022 20:05:27 -0700
David Ahern <[email protected]> • #2284
Re: xdp forward issue
Tue, 6 Dec 2022 16:26:59 -0800
team lnx <[email protected]> • #2283
Re: xdp forward issue
Tue, 6 Dec 2022 14:42:20 -0700
David Ahern <[email protected]> • #2282
Re: xdp forward issue
Tue, 6 Dec 2022 12:36:04 -0800
team lnx <[email protected]> • #2281
Re: xdp forward issue
Tue, 6 Dec 2022 13:10:12 -0700
David Ahern <[email protected]> • #2280
xdp forward issue
Tue, 6 Dec 2022 08:43:33 -0800
team lnx <[email protected]> • #2279
Re: Potential ICE driver bug when returning XDP_TX with multiple channels
Tue, 6 Dec 2022 12:39:11 +0100
Maciej Fijalkowski <[email protected]> • #2278
questions: LPM -> irq or queue mapping on the card for cake?
Fri, 2 Dec 2022 08:53:43 -0800
Dave Taht <[email protected]> • #2277
Potential ICE driver bug when returning XDP_TX with multiple channels
Fri, 2 Dec 2022 16:01:24 +0000
Robin Cowley <[email protected]> • #2276
Re: make XDP program aware of multi buffer
Wed, 30 Nov 2022 14:11:03 +0100
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <[email protected]> • #2275
Re: make XDP program aware of multi buffer
Wed, 30 Nov 2022 09:54:35 +0100
Henning Fehrmann <[email protected]> • #2274
Re: [PATCH bpf] ice: xsk: do not use xdp_return_frame() on tx_buf->raw_buf
Tue, 29 Nov 2022 17:04:37 +0100
Maciej Fijalkowski <[email protected]> • #2273
[PATCH bpf] ice: xsk: do not use xdp_return_frame() on tx_buf->raw_buf
Tue, 29 Nov 2022 15:25:28 +0100
Maciej Fijalkowski <[email protected]> • #2272
Re: ICE driver bug using XDP_TX with multi FCQs
Tue, 29 Nov 2022 14:10:48 +0000
Robin Cowley <[email protected]> • #2271
Re: ICE driver bug using XDP_TX with multi FCQs
Tue, 29 Nov 2022 14:56:25 +0100
Maciej Fijalkowski <[email protected]> • #2270
Re: make XDP program aware of multi buffer
Tue, 29 Nov 2022 14:24:32 +0100
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <[email protected]> • #2269
make XDP program aware of multi buffer
Tue, 29 Nov 2022 13:14:51 +0100
Henning Fehrmann <[email protected]> • #2268
Re: ICE driver bug using XDP_TX with multi FCQs
Fri, 25 Nov 2022 09:16:17 +0100
Magnus Karlsson <[email protected]> • #2267
ICE driver bug using XDP_TX with multi FCQs
Thu, 24 Nov 2022 15:23:52 +0000
Robin Cowley <[email protected]> • #2266
Re: static variable in xdp
Sun, 20 Nov 2022 00:58:36 +0100
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <[email protected]> • #2265
Re: static variable in xdp
Sat, 19 Nov 2022 18:46:13 +0100
Benjamin Beckmeyer <[email protected]> • #2264
Re: static variable in xdp
Sat, 19 Nov 2022 13:14:49 +0100
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <[email protected]> • #2263
static variable in xdp
Sat, 19 Nov 2022 10:44:38 +0100
Benjamin Beckmeyer <[email protected]> • #2262
Re: AF_XDP-example/txonly: strange performance with different packet sizes
Mon, 31 Oct 2022 23:40:10 +0100
"Mostafa, Jalal (IPE)" <[email protected]> • #2261
AF_XDP-example/txonly: strange performance with different packet sizes
Wed, 26 Oct 2022 12:34:12 +0200
"Mostafa, Jalal (IPE)" <[email protected]> • #2260
Re: [xdp-cloud] Re: Questions about Offloads and XDP-Hints regarding a Cloud-Provider Use-Case
Mon, 3 Oct 2022 12:56:31 +0200
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <[email protected]> • #2259
Re: traffic redirection and tapping
Fri, 30 Sep 2022 08:35:10 -0600
David Ahern <[email protected]> • #2258
traffic redirection and tapping
Thu, 29 Sep 2022 16:56:21 +0200
Henning Fehrmann <[email protected]> • #2257
Re: [xdp-cloud] Re: Questions about Offloads and XDP-Hints regarding a Cloud-Provider Use-Case
Thu, 29 Sep 2022 15:16:34 +0200
Marcus Wichelmann <[email protected]> • #2256
Re: [xdp-cloud] Questions about Offloads and XDP-Hints regarding a Cloud-Provider Use-Case
Wed, 28 Sep 2022 22:00:13 -0600
David Ahern <[email protected]> • #2255
Re: [xdp-cloud] Questions about Offloads and XDP-Hints regarding a Cloud-Provider Use-Case
Thu, 29 Sep 2022 10:14:02 +0800
Jason Wang <[email protected]> • #2254
Re: [xdp-cloud] Questions about Offloads and XDP-Hints regarding a Cloud-Provider Use-Case
Thu, 29 Sep 2022 00:37:12 +0200
Lorenzo Bianconi <[email protected]> • #2253
Re: [xdp-cloud] Questions about Offloads and XDP-Hints regarding a Cloud-Provider Use-Case
Wed, 28 Sep 2022 12:32:01 -0600
David Ahern <[email protected]> • #2252
Re: [xdp-cloud] Questions about Offloads and XDP-Hints regarding a Cloud-Provider Use-Case
Wed, 28 Sep 2022 20:07:41 +0200
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <[email protected]> • #2251
Questions about Offloads and XDP-Hints regarding a Cloud-Provider Use-Case
Wed, 28 Sep 2022 15:54:03 +0200
Marcus Wichelmann <[email protected]> • #2250
Re: Questions about IRQ utilization and throughput with XDP_REDIRECT on Intel i40e
Fri, 23 Sep 2022 16:28:31 -0500
Adam Smith <[email protected]> • #2249
Re: Questions about IRQ utilization and throughput with XDP_REDIRECT on Intel i40e
Fri, 23 Sep 2022 18:55:17 +0200
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <[email protected]> • #2248
Re: XDP and AF_XDP performance comparison
Fri, 23 Sep 2022 15:11:08 +0200
Federico Parola <[email protected]> • #2247
Re: XDP and AF_XDP performance comparison
Thu, 22 Sep 2022 20:38:55 +0200
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <[email protected]> • #2246
XDP and AF_XDP performance comparison
Thu, 22 Sep 2022 10:21:08 +0200
Federico Parola <[email protected]> • #2245
Re: Questions about IRQ utilization and throughput with XDP_REDIRECT on Intel i40e
Tue, 20 Sep 2022 12:37:33 -0500
Adam Smith <[email protected]> • #2244
Re: Questions about IRQ utilization and throughput with XDP_REDIRECT on Intel i40e
Tue, 20 Sep 2022 10:17:13 +0200
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <[email protected]> • #2243
Questions about IRQ utilization and throughput with XDP_REDIRECT on Intel i40e
Mon, 19 Sep 2022 15:55:08 -0500
Adam Smith <[email protected]> • #2242
RE: XDP-ZC RSS - Mellanox
Tue, 13 Sep 2022 09:09:31 +0000
Dries De Winter <[email protected]> • #2241
Re: XDP-ZC RSS - Mellanox
Tue, 13 Sep 2022 08:50:19 +0000
Alasdair McWilliam <[email protected]> • #2240
Re: XDP-ZC RSS - Mellanox
Mon, 12 Sep 2022 13:41:46 +0000
Dries De Winter <[email protected]> • #2239
Re: [PATCH bpf] xsk: fix corrupted packets for XDP_SHARED_UMEM
Fri, 9 Sep 2022 13:04:01 +0200
Maciej Fijalkowski <[email protected]> • #2238
Re: [PATCH bpf] xsk: fix corrupted packets for XDP_SHARED_UMEM
Fri, 9 Sep 2022 10:15:22 +0000
Alasdair McWilliam <[email protected]> • #2237
RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH intel-net 2/2] ice: xsk: use Rx ring's XDP ring when picking NAPI context
Fri, 19 Aug 2022 14:05:23 +0000
"Kuruvinakunnel, George" <[email protected]> • #2236
RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH intel-net 1/2] ice: xsk: prohibit usage of non-balanced queue id
Thu, 18 Aug 2022 18:27:57 +0000
"Kuruvinakunnel, George" <[email protected]> • #2235
Re: [PATCH bpf] xsk: fix corrupted packets for XDP_SHARED_UMEM
Fri, 12 Aug 2022 12:37:12 +0200
Maciej Fijalkowski <[email protected]> • #2234
Re: [PATCH bpf] xsk: fix corrupted packets for XDP_SHARED_UMEM
Fri, 12 Aug 2022 10:29:28 +0000
Alasdair McWilliam <[email protected]> • #2233
Re: [PATCH bpf] xsk: fix corrupted packets for XDP_SHARED_UMEM
Fri, 12 Aug 2022 07:59:37 +0200
Magnus Karlsson <[email protected]> • #2232
Re: [PATCH bpf] xsk: fix corrupted packets for XDP_SHARED_UMEM
Thu, 11 Aug 2022 20:22:20 +0200
Maciej Fijalkowski <[email protected]> • #2231
[PATCH intel-net 2/2] ice: xsk: use Rx ring's XDP ring when picking NAPI context
Thu, 11 Aug 2022 20:21:49 +0200
Maciej Fijalkowski <[email protected]> • #2230
[PATCH intel-net 1/2] ice: xsk: prohibit usage of non-balanced queue id
Thu, 11 Aug 2022 20:21:48 +0200
Maciej Fijalkowski <[email protected]> • #2229
[PATCH intel-net 0/2] ice: xsk: reduced queue count fixes
Thu, 11 Aug 2022 20:21:47 +0200
Maciej Fijalkowski <[email protected]> • #2228
Re: [PATCH bpf] xsk: fix corrupted packets for XDP_SHARED_UMEM
Thu, 11 Aug 2022 17:20:30 +0000
Alasdair McWilliam <[email protected]> • #2227
[PATCH bpf] xsk: fix corrupted packets for XDP_SHARED_UMEM
Thu, 11 Aug 2022 13:55:23 +0200
Magnus Karlsson <[email protected]> • #2226
Re: XSK + ZC, shared UMEM and multiple Fill/Completion queues - broken?
Wed, 10 Aug 2022 14:06:21 +0000
Alasdair McWilliam <[email protected]> • #2225
Re: XSK + ZC, shared UMEM and multiple Fill/Completion queues - broken?
Wed, 10 Aug 2022 15:16:04 +0200
Magnus Karlsson <[email protected]> • #2224
Re: XSK + ZC, shared UMEM and multiple Fill/Completion queues - broken?
Tue, 9 Aug 2022 15:12:03 +0000
Alasdair McWilliam <[email protected]> • #2223
Re: XSK + ZC, shared UMEM and multiple Fill/Completion queues - broken?
Tue, 9 Aug 2022 16:58:00 +0200
Magnus Karlsson <[email protected]> • #2222
Re: XSK + ZC, shared UMEM and multiple Fill/Completion queues - broken?
Tue, 9 Aug 2022 14:50:16 +0000
Alasdair McWilliam <[email protected]> • #2221
Re: XSK + ZC, shared UMEM and multiple Fill/Completion queues - broken?
Tue, 9 Aug 2022 16:43:31 +0200
Magnus Karlsson <[email protected]> • #2220
XSK + ZC, shared UMEM and multiple Fill/Completion queues - broken?
Tue, 9 Aug 2022 14:25:47 +0000
Alasdair McWilliam <[email protected]> • #2219
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.