perl.bootstrap archive

386 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 4). Latest articles →

perl6-meta opened, bootstrap closed.
Sat, 26 Aug 2000 21:55:04 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] (Ask Bjoern Hansen) • #1212
Re: RFC Suggest: Use of L<> to link RFCs; "CONFLICTS WITH", "REQUIRES", "STATUS" sections
23 Aug 2000 19:13:40 -0400
[email protected] (Chaim Frenkel) • #1211
new list: [email protected]
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 11:07:55 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] (Ask Bjoern Hansen) • #1210
Re: RFC Suggest: Use of L<> to link RFCs; "CONFLICTS WITH", "REQUIRES", "STATUS" sections
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 09:29:26 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] (Larry Wall) • #1209
Re: RFC Suggest: Use of L<> to link RFCs; "CONFLICTS WITH", "REQUIRES", "STATUS" sections
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 09:29:21 -0400
[email protected] (John Porter) • #1208
Re: RFC Suggest: Use of L<> to link RFCs; "CONFLICTS WITH", "REQUIRES", "STATUS" sections
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 04:35:24 -0400
[email protected] ("Bradley M. Kuhn") • #1207
Re: RFC format
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 04:33:06 -0400
[email protected] ("Bradley M. Kuhn") • #1206
Re: RFC Suggest: Use of L<> to link RFCs; "CONFLICTS WITH", "REQUIRES", "STATUS" sections
22 Aug 2000 18:20:04 -0400
[email protected] (Chaim Frenkel) • #1205
Re: RFC Suggest: Use of L<> to link RFCs; "CONFLICTS WITH", "REQUIRES", "STATUS" sections
Tue, 22 Aug 2000 09:40:13 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] (Larry Wall) • #1204
Re: RFC Suggest: Use of L<> to link RFCs; "CONFLICTS WITH", "REQUIRES", "STATUS" sections
Tue, 22 Aug 2000 12:17:49 -0400
[email protected] (Buddha Buck) • #1203
Re: RFC Suggest: Use of L<> to link RFCs; "CONFLICTS WITH", "REQUIRES", "STATUS" sections
22 Aug 2000 12:15:32 -0400
[email protected] (Chaim Frenkel) • #1202
Re: RFC format
Tue, 22 Aug 2000 09:32:46 -0600 (MDT)
[email protected] (Nathan Torkington) • #1201
Re: RFC Suggest: Use of L<> to link RFCs; "CONFLICTS WITH", "REQUIRES", "STATUS" sections
Tue, 22 Aug 2000 07:52:50 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] (Larry Wall) • #1200
Re: RFC Suggest: Use of L<> to link RFCs; "CONFLICTS WITH", "REQUIRES", "STATUS" sections
Tue, 22 Aug 2000 10:47:56 -0400
[email protected] (John Porter) • #1199
Re: RFC format
Tue, 22 Aug 2000 04:56:50 -0400
[email protected] (Michael G Schwern) • #1198
Re: RFC Suggest: Use of L<> to link RFCs; "CONFLICTS WITH", "REQUIRES", "STATUS" sections
22 Aug 2000 01:20:32 -0400
[email protected] (Chaim Frenkel) • #1197
Re: It's August the 18th!
Mon, 21 Aug 2000 19:23:48 -0600 (MDT)
[email protected] (Nathan Torkington) • #1196
Re: RFC format
Mon, 21 Aug 2000 19:05:49 -0600 (MDT)
[email protected] (Nathan Torkington) • #1195
Re: RFC Suggest: Use of L<> to link RFCs; "CONFLICTS WITH", "REQUIRES", "STATUS" sections
Mon, 21 Aug 2000 09:25:12 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] (Dave Storrs) • #1194
Re: RFC Suggest: Use of L<> to link RFCs; "CONFLICTS WITH", "REQUIRES", "STATUS" sections
Mon, 21 Aug 2000 08:32:46 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] (Larry Wall) • #1193
Re: RFC Suggest: Use of L<> to link RFCs; "CONFLICTS WITH", "REQUIRES", "STATUS" sections
Mon, 21 Aug 2000 09:28:43 -0400
[email protected] (John Porter) • #1192
Re: A procmail rule to filter perl.org messages.
21 Aug 2000 11:54:16 +0200
[email protected] ((Johan Vromans)) • #1191
Re: A procmail rule to filter perl.org messages.
Mon, 21 Aug 2000 10:15:04 +0100
[email protected] (Alan Burlison) • #1190
Re: RFC Suggest: Use of L<> to link RFCs; "CONFLICTS WITH", "REQUIRES", "STATUS" sections
Sun, 20 Aug 2000 04:30:39 -0400
[email protected] ("Bradley M. Kuhn") • #1189
Re: It's August the 18th!
Sun, 20 Aug 2000 04:16:42 -0400
[email protected] ("Bradley M. Kuhn") • #1188
Re: RFC Suggest: Use of L<> to link RFCs; "CONFLICTS WITH", "REQUIRES", "STATUS" sections
Fri, 18 Aug 2000 16:56:46 -0700
[email protected] (Peter Scott) • #1187
Re: RFC Suggest: Use of L<> to link RFCs; "CONFLICTS WITH", "REQUIRES", "STATUS" sections
Fri, 18 Aug 2000 17:27:36 -0600 (MDT)
[email protected] (Nathan Torkington) • #1186
Re: It's August the 18th!
Fri, 18 Aug 2000 16:03:41 -0600 (MDT)
[email protected] (Nathan Torkington) • #1185
Re: It's August the 18th!
Fri, 18 Aug 2000 15:57:01 -0600 (MDT)
[email protected] (Nathan Torkington) • #1184
Re: KOMODO [was : I'm a lurker too ...]
Fri, 18 Aug 2000 22:06:47 +0100
[email protected] ("Mike Lacey") • #1183
Re: It's August the 18th!
Fri, 18 Aug 2000 11:01:15 -0400
[email protected] ("Bradley M. Kuhn") • #1182
It's August the 18th!
Fri, 18 Aug 2000 15:33:33 +0900
[email protected] (Simon Cozens) • #1181
perl5 complaints list - status
Thu, 17 Aug 2000 19:14:05 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] (horos) • #1180
Re: RFC Suggest: Use of L<> to link RFCs; "CONFLICTS WITH", "REQUIRES", "STATUS" sections
Thu, 17 Aug 2000 17:59:22 -0400
[email protected] ("Bradley M. Kuhn") • #1179
Re: RFC Suggest: Use of L<> to link RFCs; "CONFLICTS WITH", "REQUIRES", "STATUS" sections
Thu, 17 Aug 2000 12:24:33 -0500
[email protected] ("David L. Nicol") • #1178
Re: A procmail rule to filter perl.org messages.
Thu, 17 Aug 2000 08:18:45 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] ((Johan Vromans)) • #1177
Re: RFC Suggest: Use of L<> to link RFCs; "CONFLICTS WITH", "REQUIRES", "STATUS" sections
Thu, 17 Aug 2000 16:06:31 +1000
[email protected] • #1176
RFC Suggest: Use of L<> to link RFCs; "CONFLICTS WITH", "REQUIRES", "STATUS" sections
Wed, 16 Aug 2000 19:34:51 -0400
[email protected] ("Bradley M. Kuhn") • #1175
A procmail rule to filter perl.org messages.
Wed, 16 Aug 2000 13:54:06 -0700
[email protected] (Jacob Davies) • #1174
Re: RFC thoughts and guidelines
Wed, 16 Aug 2000 18:02:37 +1000
[email protected] • #1173
Re: RFC thoughts and guidelines
Wed, 16 Aug 2000 01:36:47 -0600
[email protected] (Tony Olekshy) • #1172
RFC thoughts and guidelines
Wed, 16 Aug 2000 17:12:44 +1000
[email protected] • #1171
Re: command line option: $|++
15 Aug 2000 23:31:54 -0400
[email protected] (Chaim Frenkel) • #1170
Re: command line option: $|++
Wed, 16 Aug 2000 13:08:14 +1000
[email protected] • #1169
Re: Portable upper/lower case regexp matchesre and procedures
Sun, 13 Aug 2000 12:59:00 +0100
[email protected] (Greg McCarroll) • #1168
Re: Content type
Tue, 15 Aug 2000 09:46:19 -0400
[email protected] (Matthew Smith) • #1167
Content type
Tue, 15 Aug 2000 13:46:55 +0100
[email protected] ("raptor") • #1166
Re: RFC 65 (v1) Add change bar functionality to pod
14 Aug 2000 12:20:27 -0700
[email protected] (Russ Allbery) • #1165
Re: KOMODO [was : I'm a lurker too ...]
Mon, 14 Aug 2000 20:32:06 +0100
[email protected] ("raptor") • #1164
Re: Portable upper/lower case regexp matchesre and procedures
Mon, 14 Aug 2000 11:34:20 -0600 (MDT)
[email protected] (Nathan Torkington) • #1163
Re: Portable upper/lower case regexp matchesre and procedures
Mon, 14 Aug 2000 10:33:37 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] (Dave Storrs) • #1162
Re: I'm a lurker too ...
Mon, 14 Aug 2000 15:36:24 +0100
[email protected] ("raptor") • #1161
Re: RFC 65 (v1) Add change bar functionality to pod
Mon, 14 Aug 2000 18:21:00 +1000
[email protected] • #1160
Re: Portable upper/lower case regexp matchesre and procedures
Sun, 13 Aug 2000 12:59:00 +0100
[email protected] (Greg McCarroll) • #1159
Re: Are list removals also posted to perl6-announce?
Sat, 12 Aug 2000 15:10:14 -0600 (MDT)
[email protected] (Nathan Torkington) • #1158
Are list removals also posted to perl6-announce?
Sat, 12 Aug 2000 14:57:07 -0400 (EDT)
[email protected] (Philip Newton) • #1157
Re: Portable upper/lower case regexp matchesre and procedures
Fri, 11 Aug 2000 11:37:48 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] (Larry Wall) • #1156
"moderator" for the @perl.org lists.
Fri, 11 Aug 2000 11:17:15 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] (Ask Bjoern Hansen) • #1155
Re: Portable upper/lower case regexp matchesre and procedures
Fri, 11 Aug 2000 09:05:05 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] (Dave Storrs) • #1154
Re: I'm a lurker too ...
Thu, 10 Aug 2000 16:45:53 -0400
[email protected] (Dan Sugalski) • #1153
Re: I'm a lurker too ...
Thu, 10 Aug 2000 20:22:38 +0000
[email protected] (Nick Ing-Simmons) • #1152
Re: RFC voting ?!!
Tue, 8 Aug 2000 23:36:41 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] (Ask Bjoern Hansen) • #1151
Re: Presentation and Q
Tue, 8 Aug 2000 20:35:58 -0600 (MDT)
[email protected] (Nathan Torkington) • #1150
Re: Presentation and Q
Tue, 8 Aug 2000 20:35:09 -0600 (MDT)
[email protected] (Nathan Torkington) • #1149
Re: News <-> Mail gateway. Scheduled or Rejected?
Tue, 8 Aug 2000 13:33:26 -0600 (MDT)
[email protected] (Nathan Torkington) • #1148
Re: News <-> Mail gateway. Scheduled or Rejected?
08 Aug 2000 12:02:16 -0700
[email protected] (Russ Allbery) • #1147
Re: RFC voting ?!!
08 Aug 2000 11:54:45 -0700
[email protected] (Russ Allbery) • #1146
ok, ok, enough already!
Tue, 8 Aug 2000 10:13:57 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] (horos) • #1145
Presentation and Q
Tue, 08 Aug 2000 14:08:08 -0400
[email protected] (Mike G) • #1144
New 'CHANGES' section for RFC's
Tue, 08 Aug 2000 09:30:29 -0700
[email protected] (Nathan Wiger) • #1143
Re: Perl 6 project plan / roadmap
Tue, 08 Aug 2000 12:53:03 -0400
[email protected] (Dan Sugalski) • #1142
Re: CGI debugging environment
Tue, 8 Aug 2000 10:18:59 -0600 (MDT)
[email protected] (Nathan Torkington) • #1141
Re: CGI debugging environment
Tue, 8 Aug 2000 19:17:27 +0300
[email protected] ("Roman M . Parparov") • #1140
Re: News <-> Mail gateway. Scheduled or Rejected?
Tue, 8 Aug 2000 10:04:22 -0600 (MDT)
[email protected] (Nathan Torkington) • #1139
Re: RFC voting ?!!
08 Aug 2000 12:02:11 -0400
[email protected] (Chaim Frenkel) • #1138
News <-> Mail gateway. Scheduled or Rejected?
08 Aug 2000 11:59:33 -0400
[email protected] (Chaim Frenkel) • #1137
Re: RFC voting ?!!
Tue, 08 Aug 2000 12:14:04 +0200
[email protected] (Bart Lateur) • #1136
CGI debugging environment
Tue, 8 Aug 2000 12:06:37 +0300
[email protected] ("Roman M . Parparov") • #1135
Re: RFCs: two proposals for change
Tue, 08 Aug 2000 10:30:42 +0200
[email protected] (Bart Lateur) • #1134
Re: RFC voting ?!!
08 Aug 2000 08:47:59 +0100
[email protected] (Piers Cawley) • #1133
Re: RFCs: two proposals for change
08 Aug 2000 08:40:20 +0100
[email protected] (Piers Cawley) • #1132
Re: Perl 6 project plan / roadmap
Tue, 8 Aug 2000 17:23:56 +1000
[email protected] • #1131
Re: Perl 6 project plan / roadmap
Mon, 7 Aug 2000 21:05:09 -0400
[email protected] (Bryan C . Warnock) • #1130
Re: I'm a lurker too ...
Mon, 7 Aug 2000 20:39:34 -0400 (EDT)
[email protected] (Dan Sugalski) • #1129
Re: RFCs: two proposals for change
Mon, 7 Aug 2000 19:05:50 -0500
[email protected] (Elaine -HFB- Ashton) • #1128
Re: RFCs: two proposals for change
Mon, 7 Aug 2000 19:29:43 -0400
[email protected] (Bryan C . Warnock) • #1127
Re: I'm a lurker too ...
Mon, 7 Aug 2000 23:39:30 +0100
[email protected] ("Mike Lacey") • #1126
RE: I'm a lurker too ...
Mon, 7 Aug 2000 13:47:18 -0700
[email protected] (Brent Fulgham) • #1125
Re: RFC's
Mon, 7 Aug 2000 15:45:48 -0500
[email protected] ("Greg Rollins") • #1124
Re: RFC's
Mon, 7 Aug 2000 14:24:37 -0600 (MDT)
[email protected] (Nathan Torkington) • #1123
Re: RFC's
Mon, 7 Aug 2000 16:16:10 -0400
[email protected] ("Chet the \[ Rabid \] Nairobian Death Monkey") • #1122
RFC's
Mon, 7 Aug 2000 15:14:30 -0500
[email protected] ("Greg Rollins") • #1121
Re: I'm a lurker too ...
Mon, 7 Aug 2000 13:09:31 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] (Ask Bjoern Hansen) • #1120
Re: I'm a lurker too ...
Mon, 07 Aug 2000 16:00:37 -0400
[email protected] (Dan Sugalski) • #1119
Re: I'm a lurker too ...
Mon, 07 Aug 2000 15:52:29 -0400
[email protected] (Dan Sugalski) • #1118
Re: I'm a lurker too ...
Mon, 7 Aug 2000 12:48:47 -0700
[email protected] (Gary Richardson) • #1117
Re: Apathetic and Lurkers
Mon, 7 Aug 2000 15:40:24 -0400
[email protected] ("J. J. Horner") • #1116
I'm a lurker too ...
Mon, 07 Aug 2000 15:39:15 -0400
[email protected] (lovine) • #1115
Re: Apathetic and Lurkers
Mon, 7 Aug 2000 14:15:05 -0500
[email protected] ("Greg Rollins") • #1114
Apathetic and Lurkers
Mon, 7 Aug 2000 13:59:00 -0500
[email protected] ("Greg Rollins") • #1113
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.