perl.cpan.workers archive

665 archived articles, newest first (page 4 of 7). Latest articles →

Re: Last call for review of Test-Builder using Test2 (Formerly Test-Stream)
Sat, 6 Feb 2016 23:13:33 +1300
[email protected] (Kent Fredric) • #1398
Last call for review of Test-Builder using Test2 (Formerly Test-Stream)
Fri, 5 Feb 2016 11:15:18 -0800
[email protected] (Chad Granum) • #1397
Re: addressing kwalitee and other quality issues at the head of the CPAN River
Fri, 29 Jan 2016 13:45:38 +1300
[email protected] (Kent Fredric) • #1396
Re: addressing kwalitee and other quality issues at the head of the CPAN River
Fri, 29 Jan 2016 13:41:43 +1300
[email protected] (Kent Fredric) • #1395
addressing kwalitee and other quality issues at the head of the CPAN River
Fri, 29 Jan 2016 00:01:33 +0000
[email protected] (Neil Bowers) • #1394
Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?
Mon, 18 Jan 2016 14:52:37 -0800
[email protected] (Chad Granum) • #1393
Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?
Mon, 18 Jan 2016 13:13:31 -0800
[email protected] (Chad Granum) • #1392
Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?
Mon, 18 Jan 2016 09:39:53 +0100
[email protected] (Aristotle Pagaltzis) • #1391
Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?
Mon, 18 Jan 2016 19:11:43 +1300
[email protected] (Kent Fredric) • #1390
Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?
Mon, 18 Jan 2016 19:08:34 +1300
[email protected] (Kent Fredric) • #1389
Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?
Sun, 17 Jan 2016 21:59:33 -0800
[email protected] (Chad Granum) • #1388
Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?
Sun, 17 Jan 2016 21:53:04 -0800
[email protected] (Chad Granum) • #1387
Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?
Mon, 18 Jan 2016 06:41:12 +0100
[email protected] (Aristotle Pagaltzis) • #1386
Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?
Wed, 13 Jan 2016 12:15:40 -0800
[email protected] (Chad Granum) • #1385
Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?
Wed, 13 Jan 2016 20:58:57 +0100
[email protected] (Sawyer X) • #1384
Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?
Thu, 14 Jan 2016 07:50:18 +1300
[email protected] (Kent Fredric) • #1383
Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?
Wed, 13 Jan 2016 10:39:26 -0800
[email protected] (Chad Granum) • #1382
Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?
Wed, 13 Jan 2016 03:12:58 +0100
[email protected] (Sawyer X) • #1381
Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?
Tue, 12 Jan 2016 14:26:17 -0800
[email protected] (Chad Granum) • #1380
Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?
Tue, 12 Jan 2016 22:58:55 +0100
[email protected] (Sawyer X) • #1379
Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?
Wed, 13 Jan 2016 10:55:17 +1300
[email protected] (Kent Fredric) • #1378
Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?
Tue, 12 Jan 2016 22:48:59 +0100
[email protected] (Sawyer X) • #1377
Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?
Tue, 12 Jan 2016 11:56:14 -0800
[email protected] (Chad Granum) • #1376
Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?
Tue, 12 Jan 2016 11:41:04 -0800
[email protected] (Michael G Schwern) • #1375
Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?
Mon, 11 Jan 2016 19:26:23 -0800
[email protected] (Chad Granum) • #1374
Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?
Mon, 11 Jan 2016 19:24:56 -0800
[email protected] (Karen Etheridge) • #1373
Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?
Tue, 12 Jan 2016 16:21:12 +1300
[email protected] (Kent Fredric) • #1372
Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?
Mon, 11 Jan 2016 19:19:46 -0800
[email protected] (Chad Granum) • #1371
Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?
Mon, 11 Jan 2016 19:14:52 -0800
[email protected] (Chad Granum) • #1370
Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?
Mon, 11 Jan 2016 22:04:27 -0500
[email protected] (Ricardo Signes) • #1369
Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?
Mon, 11 Jan 2016 18:52:16 -0800
[email protected] (Chris Nandor) • #1368
Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?
Tue, 12 Jan 2016 14:34:11 +1300
[email protected] (Kent Fredric) • #1367
Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?
Mon, 11 Jan 2016 16:53:15 -0800
[email protected] (Chad Granum) • #1366
Re: CPAN River - water quality metric
Mon, 4 Jan 2016 22:39:44 +0100
[email protected] ("Philippe Bruhat (BooK)") • #1365
Re: CPAN River - water quality metric
Mon, 4 Jan 2016 15:47:58 +0000
[email protected] (David Cantrell) • #1364
Re: CPAN River - water quality metric
Thu, 24 Dec 2015 20:21:59 -0500
[email protected] (David Golden) • #1363
Re: CPAN River - water quality metric
Fri, 25 Dec 2015 10:06:47 +0900
[email protected] (Kenichi Ishigaki) • #1362
Re: CPAN River - water quality metric
Thu, 24 Dec 2015 20:04:23 +0100
[email protected] (Sawyer X) • #1361
Re: CPAN River - water quality metric
Thu, 24 Dec 2015 10:00:17 -0800
[email protected] (Karen Etheridge) • #1360
Re: CPAN River - water quality metric
Thu, 24 Dec 2015 14:53:55 +0100
[email protected] (Helmut Wollmersdorfer) • #1359
Re: CPAN River - water quality metric
Thu, 24 Dec 2015 11:33:55 +0100
[email protected] (Sawyer X) • #1358
Re: CPAN River - water quality metric
Thu, 24 Dec 2015 09:10:16 +0000
[email protected] (Neil Bowers) • #1357
The PRC and kwalitee
Thu, 24 Dec 2015 09:01:25 +0000
[email protected] (Neil Bowers) • #1356
Re: CPAN River - water quality metric
Wed, 23 Dec 2015 17:14:11 -0600
[email protected] (Douglas Bell) • #1355
Re: CPAN River - water quality metric
Wed, 23 Dec 2015 23:11:16 +0000
[email protected] (Neil Bowers) • #1354
Re: CPAN River - water quality metric
Wed, 23 Dec 2015 22:49:18 +0000
[email protected] (Neil Bowers) • #1353
Re: CPAN River - water quality metric
Wed, 23 Dec 2015 22:44:16 +0000
[email protected] (Neil Bowers) • #1352
Re: CPAN River - water quality metric
Wed, 23 Dec 2015 22:51:48 +0200
[email protected] (Shlomi Fish) • #1351
Re: CPAN River - water quality metric
Wed, 23 Dec 2015 18:46:46 +0000
[email protected] (Tim Bunce) • #1350
Re: CPAN River - water quality metric
Wed, 23 Dec 2015 15:46:48 +0900
[email protected] (Kenichi Ishigaki) • #1349
Re: CPAN River - water quality metric
Wed, 23 Dec 2015 15:31:45 +1000
[email protected] (Adam Kennedy) • #1348
Re: CPAN River - water quality metric
Tue, 22 Dec 2015 21:58:55 -0600
[email protected] (Douglas Bell) • #1347
Re: CPAN River - water quality metric
Tue, 22 Dec 2015 19:16:48 -0500
[email protected] (David Golden) • #1346
CPAN River - water quality metric
Tue, 22 Dec 2015 23:05:03 +0000
[email protected] (Neil Bowers) • #1345
Re: Possible bug in Test::Builder, fix is easy, but might break things
Mon, 21 Dec 2015 17:10:56 -0800
[email protected] (Karen Etheridge) • #1344
Re: Possible bug in Test::Builder, fix is easy, but might break things
Mon, 21 Dec 2015 21:07:39 -0800
[email protected] (Chad Granum) • #1343
Re: Possible bug in Test::Builder, fix is easy, but might break things
Mon, 21 Dec 2015 20:58:57 -0800
[email protected] (Chad Granum) • #1342
Possible bug in Test::Builder, fix is easy, but might break things
Mon, 21 Dec 2015 16:04:34 -0800
[email protected] (Chad Granum) • #1341
The CPAN River
Thu, 26 Nov 2015 08:59:56 +0000
[email protected] (Neil Bowers) • #1340
Software-License next steps
Sat, 21 Nov 2015 21:28:24 -0500
[email protected] (Ricardo Signes) • #1339
Re: democratizing some of my dists
Tue, 17 Nov 2015 18:33:27 +0100
[email protected] (Olivier Mengué) • #1338
Re: democratizing some of my dists
Fri, 13 Nov 2015 19:59:08 -0500
[email protected] (Ricardo Signes) • #1337
Re: democratizing some of my dists
Fri, 13 Nov 2015 19:58:05 -0500
[email protected] (Ricardo Signes) • #1336
Re: democratizing some of my dists
Sat, 14 Nov 2015 13:00:36 +1300
[email protected] (Kent Fredric) • #1335
Re: democratizing some of my dists
Fri, 13 Nov 2015 18:50:37 -0500
[email protected] (James E Keenan) • #1334
Re: democratizing some of my dists
Fri, 13 Nov 2015 15:08:16 -0500
[email protected] (Ricardo Signes) • #1333
Re: democratizing some of my dists
Fri, 13 Nov 2015 14:36:02 -0500
[email protected] (Ricardo Signes) • #1332
Re: democratizing some of my dists
Fri, 13 Nov 2015 12:38:11 -0500
[email protected] (Ricardo Signes) • #1331
Re: democratizing some of my dists
Fri, 13 Nov 2015 16:19:13 +0000
[email protected] (Alberto Simoes) • #1330
democratizing some of my dists
Fri, 13 Nov 2015 11:16:14 -0500
[email protected] (Ricardo Signes) • #1329
Re: Fwd: [ExtUtils-MakeMaker] the future of EUMM'sdevelopmentmodel(#242)
Wed, 11 Nov 2015 05:35:38 -0500
[email protected] (Graham Knop) • #1328
Re: Fwd: [ExtUtils-MakeMaker] the future of EUMM's developmentmodel(#242)
Mon, 9 Nov 2015 10:34:57 -0500
[email protected] (David Golden) • #1327
Re: [ExtUtils-MakeMaker] the future of EUMM's developmentmodel(#242)
Mon, 9 Nov 2015 10:15:24 +0000
[email protected] (Neil Bowers) • #1326
Re: Lancaster Consensus, deal with PUREPERL_ONLY=0
Mon, 2 Jun 2014 10:05:41 -0400
[email protected] (David Golden) • #1104
Re: Lancaster Consensus, deal with PUREPERL_ONLY=0
Mon, 2 Jun 2014 15:22:03 +0200
[email protected] (Jens Rehsack) • #1103
Re: Lancaster Consensus, deal with PUREPERL_ONLY=0
Mon, 2 Jun 2014 08:54:34 -0400
[email protected] (David Golden) • #1102
Re: Lancaster Consensus, deal with PUREPERL_ONLY=0
Mon, 2 Jun 2014 13:53:06 +0200
[email protected] (Jens Rehsack) • #1101
Re: Lancaster Consensus, deal with PUREPERL_ONLY=0
Mon, 2 Jun 2014 07:34:58 -0400
[email protected] (David Golden) • #1100
Re: Lancaster Consensus, deal with PUREPERL_ONLY=0
Mon, 2 Jun 2014 13:28:38 +0200
[email protected] (Jens Rehsack) • #1099
Re: Lancaster Consensus, deal with PUREPERL_ONLY=0
Sun, 1 Jun 2014 16:25:46 -0700
[email protected] (Karen Etheridge) • #1098
Re: Lancaster Consensus, deal with PUREPERL_ONLY=0
Sun, 1 Jun 2014 20:40:14 +0200
[email protected] (Jens Rehsack) • #1097
Re: Lancaster Consensus, deal with PUREPERL_ONLY=0
Sun, 1 Jun 2014 20:15:20 +0200
[email protected] (Jens Rehsack) • #1096
Re: Lancaster Consensus, deal with PUREPERL_ONLY=0
Sun, 1 Jun 2014 17:59:16 +0200
[email protected] (Jens Rehsack) • #1095
Re: Lancaster Consensus, deal with PUREPERL_ONLY=0
Sun, 1 Jun 2014 09:03:33 -0400
[email protected] (David Golden) • #1094
Lancaster Consensus, deal with PUREPERL_ONLY=0
Sun, 1 Jun 2014 13:19:21 +0200
[email protected] (Jens Rehsack) • #1093
x_prereqs scan
Sun, 1 Jun 2014 13:12:24 +0200
[email protected] (Jens Rehsack) • #1092
Re: More problems with 'perlbrew'
Wed, 21 May 2014 08:27:28 -0400
[email protected] (James E Keenan) • #1091
Re: More problems with 'perlbrew'
Tue, 20 May 2014 21:58:59 -0400
[email protected] (David Golden) • #1090
More problems with 'perlbrew'
Tue, 20 May 2014 20:45:57 -0400
[email protected] (James E Keenan) • #1089
Re: perlbrew switch perl-5.18.2 opening subshell
Sat, 22 Mar 2014 20:40:36 +0100
[email protected] (Aristotle Pagaltzis) • #1088
Re: perlbrew switch perl-5.18.2 opening subshell
Sat, 22 Mar 2014 13:24:35 -0500
[email protected] (James E Keenan) • #1087
Re: perlbrew switch perl-5.18.2 opening subshell
Sat, 22 Mar 2014 13:23:03 -0500
[email protected] (James E Keenan) • #1086
Re: perlbrew switch perl-5.18.2 opening subshell
Sun, 23 Mar 2014 07:04:36 +1300
[email protected] (Kent Fredric) • #1085
perlbrew switch perl-5.18.2 opening subshell
Sat, 22 Mar 2014 10:31:22 -0500
[email protected] (James E Keenan) • #1084
new tool for CPAN and proposal for creating special PAUSE user
Wed, 12 Mar 2014 23:48:08 +0200
[email protected] (Alexandr Ciornii) • #1083
Re: Configuring a new machine in an up-to-date way
Sun, 19 Jan 2014 21:41:11 -0500
[email protected] (David Golden) • #1082
Configuring a new machine in an up-to-date way
Sun, 19 Jan 2014 20:07:26 -0500
[email protected] (James E Keenan) • #1081
Re: pause.perl.org seems down - can anyone fix?
Wed, 08 Jan 2014 18:05:35 +0100
[email protected] (Cosimo Streppone) • #1080
Re: pause.perl.org seems down - can anyone fix?
Wed, 8 Jan 2014 17:57:02 -0800
[email protected] (Ask Bjørn Hansen) • #1079
pause.perl.org seems down - can anyone fix?
Wed, 8 Jan 2014 12:08:25 +0000
[email protected] (Leo Lapworth) • #1078
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.