perl.cpan.workers archive
665 archived articles, newest first (page 4 of 7). Latest articles →
Re: Last call for review of Test-Builder using Test2 (Formerly Test-Stream)
Sat, 6 Feb 2016 23:13:33 +1300Last call for review of Test-Builder using Test2 (Formerly Test-Stream)
Fri, 5 Feb 2016 11:15:18 -0800Re: addressing kwalitee and other quality issues at the head of the CPAN River
Fri, 29 Jan 2016 13:45:38 +1300Re: addressing kwalitee and other quality issues at the head of the CPAN River
Fri, 29 Jan 2016 13:41:43 +1300addressing kwalitee and other quality issues at the head of the CPAN River
Fri, 29 Jan 2016 00:01:33 +0000Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?
Mon, 18 Jan 2016 14:52:37 -0800Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?
Mon, 18 Jan 2016 13:13:31 -0800Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?
Mon, 18 Jan 2016 09:39:53 +0100Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?
Mon, 18 Jan 2016 19:11:43 +1300Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?
Mon, 18 Jan 2016 19:08:34 +1300Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?
Sun, 17 Jan 2016 21:59:33 -0800Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?
Sun, 17 Jan 2016 21:53:04 -0800Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?
Mon, 18 Jan 2016 06:41:12 +0100Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?
Wed, 13 Jan 2016 12:15:40 -0800Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?
Wed, 13 Jan 2016 20:58:57 +0100Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?
Thu, 14 Jan 2016 07:50:18 +1300Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?
Wed, 13 Jan 2016 10:39:26 -0800Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?
Wed, 13 Jan 2016 03:12:58 +0100Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?
Tue, 12 Jan 2016 14:26:17 -0800Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?
Tue, 12 Jan 2016 22:58:55 +0100Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?
Wed, 13 Jan 2016 10:55:17 +1300Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?
Tue, 12 Jan 2016 22:48:59 +0100Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?
Tue, 12 Jan 2016 11:56:14 -0800Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?
Tue, 12 Jan 2016 11:41:04 -0800Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?
Mon, 11 Jan 2016 19:26:23 -0800Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?
Mon, 11 Jan 2016 19:24:56 -0800Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?
Tue, 12 Jan 2016 16:21:12 +1300Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?
Mon, 11 Jan 2016 19:19:46 -0800Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?
Mon, 11 Jan 2016 19:14:52 -0800Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?
Mon, 11 Jan 2016 22:04:27 -0500Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?
Mon, 11 Jan 2016 18:52:16 -0800Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?
Tue, 12 Jan 2016 14:34:11 +1300Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?
Mon, 11 Jan 2016 16:53:15 -0800Re: CPAN River - water quality metric
Mon, 4 Jan 2016 22:39:44 +0100Re: CPAN River - water quality metric
Mon, 4 Jan 2016 15:47:58 +0000Re: CPAN River - water quality metric
Thu, 24 Dec 2015 20:21:59 -0500Re: CPAN River - water quality metric
Fri, 25 Dec 2015 10:06:47 +0900Re: CPAN River - water quality metric
Thu, 24 Dec 2015 20:04:23 +0100Re: CPAN River - water quality metric
Thu, 24 Dec 2015 10:00:17 -0800Re: CPAN River - water quality metric
Thu, 24 Dec 2015 14:53:55 +0100Re: CPAN River - water quality metric
Thu, 24 Dec 2015 11:33:55 +0100Re: CPAN River - water quality metric
Thu, 24 Dec 2015 09:10:16 +0000The PRC and kwalitee
Thu, 24 Dec 2015 09:01:25 +0000Re: CPAN River - water quality metric
Wed, 23 Dec 2015 17:14:11 -0600Re: CPAN River - water quality metric
Wed, 23 Dec 2015 23:11:16 +0000Re: CPAN River - water quality metric
Wed, 23 Dec 2015 22:49:18 +0000Re: CPAN River - water quality metric
Wed, 23 Dec 2015 22:44:16 +0000Re: CPAN River - water quality metric
Wed, 23 Dec 2015 22:51:48 +0200Re: CPAN River - water quality metric
Wed, 23 Dec 2015 18:46:46 +0000Re: CPAN River - water quality metric
Wed, 23 Dec 2015 15:46:48 +0900Re: CPAN River - water quality metric
Wed, 23 Dec 2015 15:31:45 +1000Re: CPAN River - water quality metric
Tue, 22 Dec 2015 21:58:55 -0600Re: CPAN River - water quality metric
Tue, 22 Dec 2015 19:16:48 -0500CPAN River - water quality metric
Tue, 22 Dec 2015 23:05:03 +0000Re: Possible bug in Test::Builder, fix is easy, but might break things
Mon, 21 Dec 2015 17:10:56 -0800Re: Possible bug in Test::Builder, fix is easy, but might break things
Mon, 21 Dec 2015 21:07:39 -0800Re: Possible bug in Test::Builder, fix is easy, but might break things
Mon, 21 Dec 2015 20:58:57 -0800Possible bug in Test::Builder, fix is easy, but might break things
Mon, 21 Dec 2015 16:04:34 -0800The CPAN River
Thu, 26 Nov 2015 08:59:56 +0000Software-License next steps
Sat, 21 Nov 2015 21:28:24 -0500Re: democratizing some of my dists
Tue, 17 Nov 2015 18:33:27 +0100Re: democratizing some of my dists
Fri, 13 Nov 2015 19:59:08 -0500Re: democratizing some of my dists
Fri, 13 Nov 2015 19:58:05 -0500Re: democratizing some of my dists
Sat, 14 Nov 2015 13:00:36 +1300Re: democratizing some of my dists
Fri, 13 Nov 2015 18:50:37 -0500Re: democratizing some of my dists
Fri, 13 Nov 2015 15:08:16 -0500Re: democratizing some of my dists
Fri, 13 Nov 2015 14:36:02 -0500Re: democratizing some of my dists
Fri, 13 Nov 2015 12:38:11 -0500Re: democratizing some of my dists
Fri, 13 Nov 2015 16:19:13 +0000democratizing some of my dists
Fri, 13 Nov 2015 11:16:14 -0500Re: Fwd: [ExtUtils-MakeMaker] the future of EUMM'sdevelopmentmodel(#242)
Wed, 11 Nov 2015 05:35:38 -0500Re: Fwd: [ExtUtils-MakeMaker] the future of EUMM's developmentmodel(#242)
Mon, 9 Nov 2015 10:34:57 -0500Re: [ExtUtils-MakeMaker] the future of EUMM's developmentmodel(#242)
Mon, 9 Nov 2015 10:15:24 +0000Re: Lancaster Consensus, deal with PUREPERL_ONLY=0
Mon, 2 Jun 2014 10:05:41 -0400Re: Lancaster Consensus, deal with PUREPERL_ONLY=0
Mon, 2 Jun 2014 15:22:03 +0200Re: Lancaster Consensus, deal with PUREPERL_ONLY=0
Mon, 2 Jun 2014 08:54:34 -0400Re: Lancaster Consensus, deal with PUREPERL_ONLY=0
Mon, 2 Jun 2014 13:53:06 +0200Re: Lancaster Consensus, deal with PUREPERL_ONLY=0
Mon, 2 Jun 2014 07:34:58 -0400Re: Lancaster Consensus, deal with PUREPERL_ONLY=0
Mon, 2 Jun 2014 13:28:38 +0200Re: Lancaster Consensus, deal with PUREPERL_ONLY=0
Sun, 1 Jun 2014 16:25:46 -0700Re: Lancaster Consensus, deal with PUREPERL_ONLY=0
Sun, 1 Jun 2014 20:40:14 +0200Re: Lancaster Consensus, deal with PUREPERL_ONLY=0
Sun, 1 Jun 2014 20:15:20 +0200Re: Lancaster Consensus, deal with PUREPERL_ONLY=0
Sun, 1 Jun 2014 17:59:16 +0200Re: Lancaster Consensus, deal with PUREPERL_ONLY=0
Sun, 1 Jun 2014 09:03:33 -0400Lancaster Consensus, deal with PUREPERL_ONLY=0
Sun, 1 Jun 2014 13:19:21 +0200x_prereqs scan
Sun, 1 Jun 2014 13:12:24 +0200Re: More problems with 'perlbrew'
Wed, 21 May 2014 08:27:28 -0400Re: More problems with 'perlbrew'
Tue, 20 May 2014 21:58:59 -0400More problems with 'perlbrew'
Tue, 20 May 2014 20:45:57 -0400Re: perlbrew switch perl-5.18.2 opening subshell
Sat, 22 Mar 2014 20:40:36 +0100Re: perlbrew switch perl-5.18.2 opening subshell
Sat, 22 Mar 2014 13:24:35 -0500Re: perlbrew switch perl-5.18.2 opening subshell
Sat, 22 Mar 2014 13:23:03 -0500Re: perlbrew switch perl-5.18.2 opening subshell
Sun, 23 Mar 2014 07:04:36 +1300perlbrew switch perl-5.18.2 opening subshell
Sat, 22 Mar 2014 10:31:22 -0500new tool for CPAN and proposal for creating special PAUSE user
Wed, 12 Mar 2014 23:48:08 +0200Re: Configuring a new machine in an up-to-date way
Sun, 19 Jan 2014 21:41:11 -0500Configuring a new machine in an up-to-date way
Sun, 19 Jan 2014 20:07:26 -0500Re: pause.perl.org seems down - can anyone fix?
Wed, 08 Jan 2014 18:05:35 +0100Re: pause.perl.org seems down - can anyone fix?
Wed, 8 Jan 2014 17:57:02 -0800pause.perl.org seems down - can anyone fix?
Wed, 8 Jan 2014 12:08:25 +0000
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.