perl.perl6.language.errors archive

311 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: $SIG{__DIE__} should be localized and cleared at the start of an eval block
17 Dec 2004 12:39:19 -0000
[email protected] ((PerlDiscuss - Perl Newsgroups and mailing lists)) • #311
RE: RFC 80 (v4) Exception objects and classes for builtins
Wed, 4 Oct 2000 09:58:03 -0500
[email protected] (David Grove) • #310
RFC 151 (v4) Merge C<$!>, C<$^E>, C<$@> and C<$?>
4 Oct 2000 06:21:39 -0000
[email protected] (Perl6 RFC Librarian) • #309
RFC 80 (v4) Exception objects and classes for builtins
4 Oct 2000 06:20:40 -0000
[email protected] (Perl6 RFC Librarian) • #308
RFC 96 (v2) A Base Class for Exception Objects
2 Oct 2000 00:32:45 -0000
[email protected] (Perl6 RFC Librarian) • #307
RFC 88 (v3) Omnibus Structured Exception/Error Handling Mechanism
2 Oct 2000 00:30:46 -0000
[email protected] (Perl6 RFC Librarian) • #306
RE: RFC 359 (v1) Improvement needed in error messages (both internal errors and die function).
Sun, 1 Oct 2000 08:37:03 -0500
[email protected] (David Grove) • #305
RFC 359 (v1) Improvement needed in error messages (both internal errors and die function).
1 Oct 2000 06:36:37 -0000
[email protected] (Perl6 RFC Librarian) • #304
RFC 1 (v1) Improvement needed in error messages (both internal errors and die function).
1 Oct 2000 06:36:24 -0000
[email protected] (Perl6 RFC Librarian) • #303
RFC 119 (v4) Object neutral error handling via exceptions
29 Sep 2000 03:21:31 -0000
[email protected] (Perl6 RFC Librarian) • #302
RFC 119 (v3) Object neutral error handling via exceptions
15 Sep 2000 05:54:32 -0000
[email protected] (Perl6 RFC Librarian) • #301
RFC 80 (v3) Exception objects and classes for builtins
14 Sep 2000 19:41:06 -0000
[email protected] (Perl6 RFC Librarian) • #300
Re: $a in @b (RFC 199)
Thu, 14 Sep 2000 14:06:21 -0400
[email protected] (John Porter) • #299
Re: $a in @b (RFC 199)
Thu, 14 Sep 2000 12:55:28 -0500
[email protected] ("David L. Nicol") • #298
RFC 151 (v3) Merge C<$!>, C<$^E>, C<$@> and C<$?>
13 Sep 2000 23:35:32 -0000
[email protected] (Perl6 RFC Librarian) • #297
Re: RFC 151 (v2) Merge C<$!>, C<$^E>, C<$@> and C<$?>
Thu, 07 Sep 2000 17:24:52 -0700
[email protected] (Peter Scott) • #296
Re: RFC 151 (v2) Merge C<$!>, C<$^E>, C<$@> and C<$?>
Thu, 07 Sep 2000 15:55:15 -0700
[email protected] (Nathan Wiger) • #295
RFC 151 (v2) Merge C<$!>, C<$^E>, C<$@> and C<$?>
6 Sep 2000 18:25:44 -0000
[email protected] (Perl6 RFC Librarian) • #294
Re: Structured exception handling should be a core module.
Tue, 29 Aug 2000 12:30:11 -0700
[email protected] (Peter Scott) • #293
Re: Structured exception handling should be a core module.
Tue, 29 Aug 2000 13:07:04 -0600
[email protected] (Tom Christiansen) • #292
Re: Structured exception handling should be a core module.
Tue, 29 Aug 2000 09:32:44 -0700
[email protected] (Peter Scott) • #291
Re: Structured exception handling should be a core module.
Mon, 28 Aug 2000 21:41:28 -0600
[email protected] (Tony Olekshy) • #290
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Mon, 28 Aug 2000 19:28:51 -0700
[email protected] (Peter Scott) • #289
Re: Structured exception handling should be a core module.
Mon, 28 Aug 2000 19:21:18 -0700
[email protected] (Peter Scott) • #288
Re: Structured exception handling should be a core module.
Mon, 28 Aug 2000 17:44:18 -0700
[email protected] (Peter Scott) • #287
On RFC 88: Serendipity while throwing a string.
Mon, 28 Aug 2000 04:01:27 -0600
[email protected] (Tony Olekshy) • #286
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Sun, 27 Aug 2000 12:16:42 -0400
[email protected] (Bennett Todd) • #285
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Sun, 27 Aug 2000 09:03:07 -0700
[email protected] (Peter Scott) • #284
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Sun, 27 Aug 2000 10:26:09 -0400
[email protected] (Bennett Todd) • #283
RFC 88 version 3 draft 1 is available via http.
Sun, 27 Aug 2000 07:18:25 -0600
[email protected] (Tony Olekshy) • #282
Re: Structured exception handling should be a core module.
Sat, 26 Aug 2000 05:34:39 -0600
[email protected] (Tony Olekshy) • #281
Re: $SIG{__DIE__} should be localized and cleared at the start of an eval block
Fri, 25 Aug 2000 13:11:01 -0600
[email protected] (Tom Christiansen) • #280
Re: $SIG{__DIE__} should be localized and cleared at the start of an eval block
Fri, 25 Aug 2000 11:44:30 -0700
[email protected] (Peter Scott) • #279
Re: Structured exception handling should be a core module.
Fri, 25 Aug 2000 10:13:12 +0200
[email protected] (Bart Lateur) • #278
$SIG{__DIE__} should be localized and cleared at the start of an eval block
Fri, 25 Aug 2000 10:13:04 +0200
[email protected] (Bart Lateur) • #277
Re: Structured exception handling should be a core module.
Fri, 25 Aug 2000 01:42:22 -0600
[email protected] (Tony Olekshy) • #276
Re: Structured exception handling should be a core module.
Thu, 24 Aug 2000 17:57:55 -0700
[email protected] (Peter Scott) • #275
Re: Structured exception handling should be a core module.
Thu, 24 Aug 2000 18:48:10 -0600
[email protected] (Tony Olekshy) • #274
Re: Structured exception handling should be a core module.
Thu, 24 Aug 2000 17:27:49 -0700
[email protected] (Peter Scott) • #273
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Thu, 24 Aug 2000 18:17:34 -0600
[email protected] (Tony Olekshy) • #272
Structured exception handling should be a core module.
Thu, 24 Aug 2000 18:06:23 -0600
[email protected] (Tony Olekshy) • #271
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Thu, 24 Aug 2000 18:07:36 -0600
[email protected] (Tony Olekshy) • #270
Re: RFC 140 (v1) One Should Not Get Away With Ignoring System Call Errors
24 Aug 2000 19:42:51 -0400
[email protected] (Chaim Frenkel) • #269
Re: Why "fatal" errors aren't special.
Thu, 24 Aug 2000 13:25:51 -0700
[email protected] (Glenn Linderman) • #268
Examples from RFC 88 redone using RFC 119 facilities [Was: Re: RFC 88 (v2) Omnibus Structured Exception/Error Handling Mechanism]
Thu, 24 Aug 2000 12:46:39 -0700
[email protected] (Glenn Linderman) • #267
Re: Why "fatal" errors aren't special.
Thu, 24 Aug 2000 11:26:22 -0700
[email protected] (Peter Scott) • #266
Re: Why except and always should be a seperate RFC.
Thu, 24 Aug 2000 11:21:15 -0700
[email protected] (Glenn Linderman) • #265
Re: Why "fatal" errors aren't special.
Thu, 24 Aug 2000 11:21:09 -0700
[email protected] (Glenn Linderman) • #264
Re: Why $@ should be structured data.
Thu, 24 Aug 2000 11:21:05 -0700
[email protected] (Glenn Linderman) • #263
Re: RFC 119v2: Object neutral error handling via exceptions
Thu, 24 Aug 2000 11:21:02 -0700
[email protected] (Glenn Linderman) • #262
Re: Exception handling [Was: Re: Things to remove]
Thu, 24 Aug 2000 11:20:50 -0700
[email protected] (Glenn Linderman) • #261
Re: RFC 140 (v1) One Should Not Get Away With Ignoring System Call Errors
Thu, 24 Aug 2000 13:14:32 -0500
[email protected] (Jarkko Hietaniemi) • #260
Re: RFC 140 (v1) One Should Not Get Away With Ignoring System Call Errors
24 Aug 2000 14:09:15 -0400
[email protected] (Chaim Frenkel) • #259
Re: RFC 88: What does catch "Foo" { } do?
Thu, 24 Aug 2000 19:02:34 +0100
[email protected] (Graham Barr) • #258
Re: RFC 88 (v2) Omnibus Structured Exception/Error Handling Mechanism
Thu, 24 Aug 2000 13:02:14 -0500
[email protected] (Jonathan Scott Duff) • #257
Re: RFC 88 (v2) Omnibus Structured Exception/Error Handling Mechanism
Thu, 24 Aug 2000 10:47:45 -0700
[email protected] (Peter Scott) • #256
Re: RFC 88 (v2) Omnibus Structured Exception/Error Handling Mechanism
Thu, 24 Aug 2000 12:50:33 -0500
[email protected] (Jonathan Scott Duff) • #255
Re: RFC 88 (v2) Omnibus Structured Exception/Error Handling Mechanism
Thu, 24 Aug 2000 10:10:49 -0700
[email protected] (Peter Scott) • #254
Re: RFC 88 (v2) Omnibus Structured Exception/Error Handling Mechanism
Thu, 24 Aug 2000 12:07:28 -0500
[email protected] (Jonathan Scott Duff) • #253
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Thu, 24 Aug 2000 09:41:51 -0700
[email protected] (Peter Scott) • #252
Re: RFC 63 (v4) Exception handling syntax
Thu, 24 Aug 2000 20:35:24 +0400 (MSD)
[email protected] (Ilya Martynov) • #251
Re: RFC 63 (v4) Exception handling syntax
Thu, 24 Aug 2000 09:16:37 -0700
[email protected] (Peter Scott) • #250
Re: RFC 63 (v4) Exception handling syntax
Thu, 24 Aug 2000 19:54:58 +0400 (MSD)
[email protected] (Ilya Martynov) • #249
RFC 88 (v2) Omnibus Structured Exception/Error Handling Mechanism
24 Aug 2000 15:37:59 -0000
[email protected] (Perl6 RFC Librarian) • #248
RFC 63 (v4) Exception handling syntax
24 Aug 2000 15:35:16 -0000
[email protected] (Perl6 RFC Librarian) • #247
Re: RFC 119v2: Object neutral error handling via exceptions
Thu, 24 Aug 2000 03:20:03 -0600
[email protected] (Tony Olekshy) • #246
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Thu, 24 Aug 2000 03:03:06 -0600
[email protected] (Tony Olekshy) • #245
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Thu, 24 Aug 2000 02:06:19 -0600
[email protected] (Tony Olekshy) • #244
Re: Exception handling [Was: Re: Things to remove]
Thu, 24 Aug 2000 00:51:50 -0600
[email protected] (Tony Olekshy) • #243
Re: Why $@ should be structured data.
Thu, 24 Aug 2000 00:51:18 -0600
[email protected] (Tony Olekshy) • #242
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 23:39:02 -0700
[email protected] (Glenn Linderman) • #241
RFC 88 version 2 is available via http.
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 23:20:16 -0600
[email protected] (Tony Olekshy) • #240
Re: RFC 119v2: Object neutral error handling via exceptions
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 22:45:19 -0600
[email protected] (Tony Olekshy) • #239
Re: RFC 140 (v1) One Should Not Get Away With Ignoring System Call Errors
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 22:16:52 -0600
[email protected] (Tony Olekshy) • #238
Re: Exception stack: let's use the @@ list.
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 22:15:15 -0600
[email protected] (Tony Olekshy) • #237
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 22:14:52 -0600
[email protected] (Tony Olekshy) • #236
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 22:14:26 -0600
[email protected] (Tony Olekshy) • #235
Why except and always should be a seperate RFC.
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 22:09:23 -0600
[email protected] (Tony Olekshy) • #234
Why "fatal" errors aren't special.
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 22:07:49 -0600
[email protected] (Tony Olekshy) • #233
Why $@ should be structured data.
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 22:06:29 -0600
[email protected] (Tony Olekshy) • #232
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 19:36:46 -0700
[email protected] (Peter Scott) • #231
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
23 Aug 2000 22:38:30 -0400
[email protected] (Chaim Frenkel) • #230
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 17:20:38 -0700
[email protected] (Glenn Linderman) • #229
Checking error checking
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 19:29:42 -0400
[email protected] (Michael G Schwern) • #228
Re: RFC 140 (v1) One Should Not Get Away With Ignoring System Call Errors
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 19:17:27 -0400
[email protected] (Michael G Schwern) • #227
Re: Draft 3 of RFC 88 version 2.
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 15:56:22 -0700
[email protected] (Peter Scott) • #226
Re: RFC 140 (v1) One Should Not Get Away With Ignoring System Call Errors
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 16:52:33 -0500
[email protected] (Jarkko Hietaniemi) • #225
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 14:40:15 -0700
[email protected] (Peter Scott) • #224
Re: RFC 140 (v1) One Should Not Get Away With Ignoring System Call Errors
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 14:36:00 -0700
[email protected] (Peter Scott) • #223
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 14:37:35 -0700
[email protected] (Glenn Linderman) • #222
Re: Exception stack: let's use the @@ list.
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 14:31:40 -0700
[email protected] (Peter Scott) • #221
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 14:30:26 -0700
[email protected] (Peter Scott) • #220
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 14:27:25 -0700
[email protected] (Peter Scott) • #219
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 14:28:06 -0700
[email protected] (Glenn Linderman) • #218
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 14:21:42 -0700
[email protected] (Peter Scott) • #217
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
23 Aug 2000 16:31:02 -0400
[email protected] (Chaim Frenkel) • #216
Re: RFC 119v2: Object neutral error handling via exceptions
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 12:41:19 -0700
[email protected] (Glenn Linderman) • #215
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 12:41:15 -0700
[email protected] (Glenn Linderman) • #214
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 12:41:08 -0700
[email protected] (Glenn Linderman) • #213
Re: RFC 119v2: Object neutral error handling via exceptions
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 12:16:19 -0600
[email protected] (Tony Olekshy) • #212
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.