perl.perl6.language.mlc

44 articles on record, showing the most recent 44.

Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ?
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 16:35:51 -0700
[email protected] (Damien Neil) • #44
Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ?
Thu, 24 Aug 2000 08:41:46 +1000
[email protected] (iain truskett) • #43
Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ?
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 15:14:23 -0700
[email protected] (Damien Neil) • #42
Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ?
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 18:23:22 -0400
[email protected] ("Michael Mathews") • #41
Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ?
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 17:26:48 -0400
[email protected] ("Michael Mathews") • #40
Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ?
Thu, 24 Aug 2000 07:18:02 +1000
[email protected] (iain truskett) • #39
Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ?
23 Aug 2000 22:56:45 +0200
[email protected] ((Johan Vromans)) • #38
Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ?
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 16:53:14 -0400
[email protected] ("Michael Mathews") • #37
Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ?
Thu, 24 Aug 2000 06:53:31 +1000
[email protected] (iain truskett) • #36
Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ?
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 18:29:20 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] ((Johan Vromans)) • #35
Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ?
23 Aug 2000 18:40:48 +0200
[email protected] ((Johan Vromans)) • #34
Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ?
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 18:47:32 +0000
[email protected] (Nick Ing-Simmons) • #33
Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ?
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 12:10:52 -0500
[email protected] ("David L. Nicol") • #32
Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ?
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 12:27:12 -0400
[email protected] ("Michael Mathews") • #31
Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ?
Thu, 24 Aug 2000 02:02:28 +1000
[email protected] (iain truskett) • #30
Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ?
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 11:45:15 -0400
[email protected] ("Michael Mathews") • #29
Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ?
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 08:08:42 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] (Dave Storrs) • #28
Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ?
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 07:57:09 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] (Dave Storrs) • #27
Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ?
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 18:28:19 +1000
[email protected] (iain truskett) • #26
Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ?
23 Aug 2000 10:06:45 +0200
[email protected] ((Johan Vromans)) • #25
Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ?
Tue, 22 Aug 2000 15:11:09 -0600
[email protected] (Tom Christiansen) • #24
Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ?
Tue, 22 Aug 2000 17:06:47 -0400
[email protected] ("Michael Mathews") • #23
Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ?
Tue, 22 Aug 2000 13:40:21 -0600
[email protected] (Tom Christiansen) • #22
why not just use C /* ... */ ?
Tue, 22 Aug 2000 19:03:49 +0000
[email protected] ("David L. Nicol") • #21
RFC 5 (v3) Multiline Comments for Perl.
14 Aug 2000 18:08:02 -0000
[email protected] (Perl6 RFC Librarian) • #20
Re: Inline comments. WAS:Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why
Mon, 07 Aug 2000 15:51:42 -0700
[email protected] (Glenn Linderman) • #19
Re: Inline comments. WAS:Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why
Mon, 7 Aug 2000 17:27:33 -0400
[email protected] ("Michael Mathews") • #18
Re: Multiline comments. WAS:Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why
Mon, 07 Aug 2000 13:58:51 -0700
[email protected] (Glenn Linderman) • #17
Multiline comments. WAS:Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why
Mon, 7 Aug 2000 16:36:04 -0400
[email protected] ("Michael Mathews") • #16
Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why
Mon, 07 Aug 2000 12:38:18 -0700
[email protected] (Glenn Linderman) • #15
RFC v2
Fri, 04 Aug 2000 23:25:58 -0700
[email protected] (Glenn Linderman) • #14
Re: RFC revised
04 Aug 2000 14:56:16 -0400
[email protected] (Chaim Frenkel) • #13
RFC 5 (v2) Multiline Comments for Perl.
4 Aug 2000 15:36:28 -0000
[email protected] (Perl6 RFC Librarian) • #12
RFC revised
Fri, 4 Aug 2000 12:45:39 -0400
[email protected] ("Michael Mathews") • #11
Fw: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why
Fri, 4 Aug 2000 09:46:11 -0400
[email protected] ("Michael Mathews") • #10
Re: RFC: multiline comments
Thu, 03 Aug 2000 18:33:58 -0700
[email protected] (Glenn Linderman) • #9
Re: multiline comments
Thu, 03 Aug 2000 18:11:37 -0600
[email protected] (Tom Christiansen) • #8
Fw: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why
Thu, 3 Aug 2000 15:26:22 -0400
[email protected] ("Michael Mathews") • #7
Re: RFC: multiline comments
Thu, 3 Aug 2000 15:06:29 -0400
[email protected] ("Michael Mathews") • #6
Re: multiline comments
Thu, 03 Aug 2000 19:28:29 +0200
[email protected] (Roland Giersig) • #5
Re: RFC: multiline comments
Thu, 03 Aug 2000 09:56:15 -0700
[email protected] (Glenn Linderman) • #4
Fw: RFC: multiline comments
Thu, 3 Aug 2000 14:24:10 -0400
[email protected] ("Michael Mathews") • #3
Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why
Thu, 3 Aug 2000 13:56:51 -0400
[email protected] ("Michael Mathews") • #2
RFC: multiline comments
Thu, 3 Aug 2000 13:41:24 -0400
[email protected] ("Michael Mathews") • #1