perl.perl6.language.mlc archive

44 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 1). Latest articles →

Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ?
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 16:35:51 -0700
[email protected] (Damien Neil) • #44
Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ?
Thu, 24 Aug 2000 08:41:46 +1000
[email protected] (iain truskett) • #43
Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ?
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 15:14:23 -0700
[email protected] (Damien Neil) • #42
Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ?
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 18:23:22 -0400
[email protected] ("Michael Mathews") • #41
Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ?
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 17:26:48 -0400
[email protected] ("Michael Mathews") • #40
Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ?
Thu, 24 Aug 2000 07:18:02 +1000
[email protected] (iain truskett) • #39
Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ?
23 Aug 2000 22:56:45 +0200
[email protected] ((Johan Vromans)) • #38
Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ?
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 16:53:14 -0400
[email protected] ("Michael Mathews") • #37
Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ?
Thu, 24 Aug 2000 06:53:31 +1000
[email protected] (iain truskett) • #36
Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ?
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 18:29:20 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] ((Johan Vromans)) • #35
Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ?
23 Aug 2000 18:40:48 +0200
[email protected] ((Johan Vromans)) • #34
Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ?
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 18:47:32 +0000
[email protected] (Nick Ing-Simmons) • #33
Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ?
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 12:10:52 -0500
[email protected] ("David L. Nicol") • #32
Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ?
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 12:27:12 -0400
[email protected] ("Michael Mathews") • #31
Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ?
Thu, 24 Aug 2000 02:02:28 +1000
[email protected] (iain truskett) • #30
Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ?
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 11:45:15 -0400
[email protected] ("Michael Mathews") • #29
Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ?
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 08:08:42 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] (Dave Storrs) • #28
Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ?
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 07:57:09 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] (Dave Storrs) • #27
Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ?
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 18:28:19 +1000
[email protected] (iain truskett) • #26
Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ?
23 Aug 2000 10:06:45 +0200
[email protected] ((Johan Vromans)) • #25
Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ?
Tue, 22 Aug 2000 15:11:09 -0600
[email protected] (Tom Christiansen) • #24
Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ?
Tue, 22 Aug 2000 17:06:47 -0400
[email protected] ("Michael Mathews") • #23
Re: why not just use C /* ... */ ?
Tue, 22 Aug 2000 13:40:21 -0600
[email protected] (Tom Christiansen) • #22
why not just use C /* ... */ ?
Tue, 22 Aug 2000 19:03:49 +0000
[email protected] ("David L. Nicol") • #21
RFC 5 (v3) Multiline Comments for Perl.
14 Aug 2000 18:08:02 -0000
[email protected] (Perl6 RFC Librarian) • #20
Re: Inline comments. WAS:Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why
Mon, 07 Aug 2000 15:51:42 -0700
[email protected] (Glenn Linderman) • #19
Re: Inline comments. WAS:Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why
Mon, 7 Aug 2000 17:27:33 -0400
[email protected] ("Michael Mathews") • #18
Re: Multiline comments. WAS:Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why
Mon, 07 Aug 2000 13:58:51 -0700
[email protected] (Glenn Linderman) • #17
Multiline comments. WAS:Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why
Mon, 7 Aug 2000 16:36:04 -0400
[email protected] ("Michael Mathews") • #16
Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why
Mon, 07 Aug 2000 12:38:18 -0700
[email protected] (Glenn Linderman) • #15
RFC v2
Fri, 04 Aug 2000 23:25:58 -0700
[email protected] (Glenn Linderman) • #14
Re: RFC revised
04 Aug 2000 14:56:16 -0400
[email protected] (Chaim Frenkel) • #13
RFC 5 (v2) Multiline Comments for Perl.
4 Aug 2000 15:36:28 -0000
[email protected] (Perl6 RFC Librarian) • #12
RFC revised
Fri, 4 Aug 2000 12:45:39 -0400
[email protected] ("Michael Mathews") • #11
Fw: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why
Fri, 4 Aug 2000 09:46:11 -0400
[email protected] ("Michael Mathews") • #10
Re: RFC: multiline comments
Thu, 03 Aug 2000 18:33:58 -0700
[email protected] (Glenn Linderman) • #9
Re: multiline comments
Thu, 03 Aug 2000 18:11:37 -0600
[email protected] (Tom Christiansen) • #8
Fw: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why
Thu, 3 Aug 2000 15:26:22 -0400
[email protected] ("Michael Mathews") • #7
Re: RFC: multiline comments
Thu, 3 Aug 2000 15:06:29 -0400
[email protected] ("Michael Mathews") • #6
Re: multiline comments
Thu, 03 Aug 2000 19:28:29 +0200
[email protected] (Roland Giersig) • #5
Re: RFC: multiline comments
Thu, 03 Aug 2000 09:56:15 -0700
[email protected] (Glenn Linderman) • #4
Fw: RFC: multiline comments
Thu, 3 Aug 2000 14:24:10 -0400
[email protected] ("Michael Mathews") • #3
Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why
Thu, 3 Aug 2000 13:56:51 -0400
[email protected] ("Michael Mathews") • #2
RFC: multiline comments
Thu, 3 Aug 2000 13:41:24 -0400
[email protected] ("Michael Mathews") • #1
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.