perl.perl6.language.regex archive

368 archived articles, newest first (page 4 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?> operators? (was Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach))
Thu, 07 Sep 2000 15:30:47 -0500
[email protected] ("David L. Nicol") • #294
Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?> operators? (was Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach))
Thu, 7 Sep 2000 16:20:51 -0400
[email protected] ("Michael Maraist") • #293
Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?> operators? (was Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach))
Thu, 07 Sep 2000 16:13:11 -0400
[email protected] (Mark-Jason Dominus) • #292
Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?> operators? (was Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach))
Thu, 7 Sep 2000 14:52:31 -0500
[email protected] (Jarkko Hietaniemi) • #291
Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?> operators? (was Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach))
Fri, 8 Sep 2000 06:50:17 +1100 (EST)
[email protected] (Damian Conway) • #290
Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?> operators? (was Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach))
Thu, 7 Sep 2000 14:49:01 -0500
[email protected] (Jonathan Scott Duff) • #289
Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?> operators? (was Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach))
Thu, 7 Sep 2000 15:42:01 -0400 (EDT)
[email protected] (Eric Roode) • #288
Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?> operators? (was Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach))
Thu, 7 Sep 2000 20:20:42 +0100 (BST)
[email protected] (Richard Proctor) • #287
Re: What's in a Regex (was RFC 145)
Thu, 07 Sep 2000 10:16:29 -0600
[email protected] (Tom Christiansen) • #286
Re: What's in a Regex (was RFC 145)
Thu, 07 Sep 2000 08:52:35 -0700
[email protected] (Nathan Wiger) • #285
Re: What's in a Regex (was RFC 145)
Thu, 07 Sep 2000 11:47:58 -0400
[email protected] (Mark-Jason Dominus) • #284
Re: What's in a Regex (was RFC 145)
Thu, 7 Sep 2000 11:44:48 -0400
[email protected] ("mike mulligan") • #283
Re: What's in a Regex (was RFC 145)
Thu, 07 Sep 2000 09:43:52 -0600
[email protected] (Tom Christiansen) • #282
Re: What's in a Regex (was RFC 145)
Thu, 07 Sep 2000 08:31:28 -0700
[email protected] (Nathan Wiger) • #281
Re: What's in a Regex (was RFC 145)
Thu, 07 Sep 2000 09:20:44 -0600
[email protected] (Tom Christiansen) • #280
Re: What's in a Regex (was RFC 145)
Thu, 07 Sep 2000 07:43:03 -0700
[email protected] (Nathan Wiger) • #279
Re: What's in a Regex (was RFC 145)
Thu, 07 Sep 2000 08:16:28 -0600
[email protected] (Tom Christiansen) • #278
Re: What's in a Regex (was RFC 145)
Thu, 7 Sep 2000 09:13:06 -0500
[email protected] (Jonathan Scott Duff) • #277
Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?> operators? (was Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach))
Thu, 07 Sep 2000 10:34:21 +0200
[email protected] (Bart Lateur) • #276
Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?> operators? (was Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach))
06 Sep 2000 18:04:18 -0700
[email protected] ((Randal L. Schwartz)) • #275
Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?> operators? (was Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach))
Wed, 6 Sep 2000 19:48:49 -0500
[email protected] (Jarkko Hietaniemi) • #274
Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?> operators? (was Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach))
Wed, 06 Sep 2000 20:35:02 -0400
[email protected] (Mark-Jason Dominus) • #273
Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?> operators? (was Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach))
06 Sep 2000 15:47:57 -0700
[email protected] ((Randal L. Schwartz)) • #272
RFC 198 (v1) Boolean Regexes
6 Sep 2000 21:24:57 -0000
[email protected] (Perl6 RFC Librarian) • #271
What's in a Regex (was RFC 145)
Wed, 06 Sep 2000 15:37:55 -0400
[email protected] (David Corbin) • #270
Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?> operators? (was Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach))
Wed, 06 Sep 2000 15:26:44 -0400
[email protected] (Mark-Jason Dominus) • #269
Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?> operators? (was Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach))
Wed, 06 Sep 2000 15:21:03 -0400
[email protected] (David Corbin) • #268
Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach)
Wed, 6 Sep 2000 15:12:28 -0400
[email protected] ("Michael Maraist") • #267
RFC 197 (v1) Numberic Value Ranges In Regular Expressions
6 Sep 2000 18:40:51 -0000
[email protected] (Perl6 RFC Librarian) • #266
Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?> operators? (was Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach))
Wed, 06 Sep 2000 12:09:20 -0600
[email protected] (Tom Christiansen) • #265
Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?> operators? (was Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach))
Wed, 6 Sep 2000 18:53:41 +0100 (BST)
[email protected] (Richard Proctor) • #264
Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?> operators? (was Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach))
Wed, 06 Sep 2000 11:56:03 -0600
[email protected] (Tom Christiansen) • #263
Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?> operators? (was Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach))
Wed, 06 Sep 2000 10:44:09 -0700
[email protected] (Nathan Wiger) • #262
Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?> operators? (was Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach))
Wed, 6 Sep 2000 13:40:28 -0400
[email protected] ("Michael Maraist") • #261
Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach)
Wed, 6 Sep 2000 07:57:33 +0100 (BST)
[email protected] (Richard Proctor) • #260
Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?> operators? (was Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach))
Wed, 6 Sep 2000 12:07:59 -0500
[email protected] (Jonathan Scott Duff) • #259
Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?> operators? (was Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach))
Wed, 06 Sep 2000 12:31:28 -0400
[email protected] (David Corbin) • #258
XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?> operators? (was Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach))
Wed, 06 Sep 2000 08:40:37 -0700
[email protected] (Nathan Wiger) • #257
Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach)
Wed, 06 Sep 2000 09:22:17 -0400
[email protected] (Buddha Buck) • #256
Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach)
Wed, 06 Sep 2000 09:05:06 -0400
[email protected] (David Corbin) • #255
Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach)
Tue, 05 Sep 2000 17:28:14 -0500
[email protected] ("David L. Nicol") • #254
Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach)
Tue, 05 Sep 2000 13:55:12 -0700
[email protected] (Nathan Wiger) • #253
Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach)
Tue, 05 Sep 2000 13:50:37 -0700
[email protected] (Nathan Wiger) • #252
Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach)
Tue, 5 Sep 2000 21:20:36 +0100 (BST)
[email protected] (Richard Proctor) • #251
Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach)
Tue, 5 Sep 2000 14:13:14 -0500
[email protected] (Jonathan Scott Duff) • #250
Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach)
Tue, 05 Sep 2000 11:38:54 -0700
[email protected] (Nathan Wiger) • #249
Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach)
Tue, 5 Sep 2000 14:12:23 -0400 (EDT)
[email protected] (Eric Roode) • #248
Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach)
Tue, 5 Sep 2000 18:54:24 +0100 (BST)
[email protected] (Richard Proctor) • #247
Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach)
Tue, 5 Sep 2000 18:49:31 +0100 (BST)
[email protected] (Richard Proctor) • #246
Re: RFC 72 (v3) Variable-length lookbehind: the regexp engine should also go backward.
Tue, 05 Sep 2000 19:08:57 +0200
[email protected] (Bart Lateur) • #245
Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach)
Tue, 05 Sep 2000 12:24:14 -0400
[email protected] (David Corbin) • #244
Re: RFC 72 (v3) Variable-length lookbehind: the regexp engine should also go backward.
Tue, 5 Sep 2000 12:16:18 -0400
[email protected] ("mike mulligan") • #243
Re: RFC 110 (v3) counting matches
Tue, 5 Sep 2000 11:01:06 -0500
[email protected] (Jonathan Scott Duff) • #242
Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach)
Tue, 05 Sep 2000 08:17:00 -0700
[email protected] (Nathan Wiger) • #241
Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach)
Tue, 05 Sep 2000 09:52:55 -0400
[email protected] (David Corbin) • #240
RFC 110 (v4) counting matches
4 Sep 2000 21:31:02 -0000
[email protected] (Perl6 RFC Librarian) • #239
Re: RFC 165 (v1) Allow Varibles in tr///
03 Sep 2000 17:48:13 -0400
[email protected] (Chaim Frenkel) • #238
Re: RFC 72 (v3) Variable-length lookbehind: the regexp engine should also go backward.
Sat, 2 Sep 2000 15:16:20 -0400
[email protected] (Peter Heslin) • #237
Re: RFC 72 (v3) Variable-length lookbehind: the regexp engine should also go backward.
Sat, 02 Sep 2000 13:52:09 +0200
[email protected] (Bart Lateur) • #236
RFC 72 (v3) Variable-length lookbehind: the regexp engine should also go backward.
1 Sep 2000 20:50:20 -0000
[email protected] (Perl6 RFC Librarian) • #235
Re: perl6-language-regex summary for 20000831
Fri, 01 Sep 2000 11:07:00 -0400
[email protected] (Mark-Jason Dominus) • #234
Re: perl6-language-regex summary for 20000831
Fri, 1 Sep 2000 13:34:16 -0400
[email protected] (Peter Heslin) • #233
Re: RFC 72 (v2) The regexp engine should go backward as well as forward.
Thu, 31 Aug 2000 21:33:08 -0400
[email protected] ("Mike Mulligan") • #232
Re: RFC 72 (v2) The regexp engine should go backward as well as forward.
Thu, 31 Aug 2000 22:51:13 -0400
[email protected] (Peter Heslin) • #231
Re: RFC 72 (v1) The regexp engine should go backward as well as forward.
Thu, 31 Aug 2000 22:49:08 -0400
[email protected] (Peter Heslin) • #230
Re: perl6-language-regex summary for 20000831
Thu, 31 Aug 2000 22:16:15 +0100 (BST)
[email protected] (Richard Proctor) • #229
Re: $& and copying: rfc 158 (was Re: RFC 110 (v3) counting matches)
Thu, 31 Aug 2000 16:00:43 -0400
[email protected] (Mark-Jason Dominus) • #228
Re: $& and copying: rfc 158 (was Re: RFC 110 (v3) counting matches)
Thu, 31 Aug 2000 13:51:59 -0600
[email protected] (Tom Christiansen) • #227
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.