perl.perl6.language.strict archive

140 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 2). Latest articles →

Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN
6 Jul 2004 05:31:16 -0000
[email protected] ((PerlDiscuss - Perl Newsgroups and mailing lists)) • #140
Musings on --i-am-a-dummy
Fri, 4 May 2001 20:38:09 +0100
[email protected] (Michael G Schwern) • #139
Re: Turn 'em on! (was Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN)
Thu, 01 Mar 2001 15:26:27 -0800
[email protected] (Peter Scott) • #138
Re: Turn 'em on! (was Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN)
Thu, 1 Mar 2001 03:56:23 -0500
[email protected] (Michael G Schwern) • #137
testing
Wed, 28 Feb 2001 19:07:30 -0800
[email protected] (Edward Peschko) • #136
Re: Turn 'em on! (was Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN)
27 Feb 2001 17:07:27 +0000
[email protected] (Piers Cawley) • #135
Re: Turn 'em on! (was Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN)
Mon, 26 Feb 2001 11:35:43 -0800
[email protected] (Nathan Wiger) • #134
Re: Turn 'em on! (was Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN)
Sat, 24 Feb 2001 18:05:27 -0500
[email protected] • #133
Re: Turn 'em on! (was Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN)
Fri, 23 Feb 2001 14:44:25 -0800 (PST)
[email protected] (Dave Storrs) • #132
Re: Turn 'em on! (was Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN)
Fri, 23 Feb 2001 14:16:34 -0800
[email protected] (Nathan Wiger) • #131
Turn 'em on! (was Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN)
Thu, 22 Feb 2001 20:37:21 -0500
[email protected] • #130
Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN (Re: Closures and default lexical-scope for subs)
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 20:33:50 -0500
[email protected] (Bryan C . Warnock) • #129
Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN (Re: Closures and default lexical-scope for subs)
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 16:34:51 -0800
[email protected] (Edward Peschko) • #128
Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN
Sun, 18 Feb 2001 18:05:02 -0800
[email protected] (Peter Scott) • #127
Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN
Mon, 19 Feb 2001 01:17:06 +0100
[email protected] (Bart Lateur) • #126
Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN
Sun, 18 Feb 2001 18:11:00 -0500
[email protected] • #125
Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN
Sun, 18 Feb 2001 14:18:19 -0800
[email protected] (Edward Peschko) • #124
RE: Warnings, strict, and CPAN
Sun, 18 Feb 2001 19:30:50 -0000
[email protected] ("Paul Marquess") • #123
Re: [PATCH perl.c] Fixing PERL5OPT (was Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN)
Sun, 18 Feb 2001 11:17:46 -0600
[email protected] (Jarkko Hietaniemi) • #122
Re: [PATCH perl.c] Fixing PERL5OPT (was Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN)
Sun, 18 Feb 2001 11:13:27 -0600
[email protected] (Jarkko Hietaniemi) • #121
Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN
Sun, 18 Feb 2001 04:45:46 +0000
[email protected] (Simon Cozens) • #120
Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN
Sun, 18 Feb 2001 14:16:21 -0800
[email protected] (Edward Peschko) • #119
[PATCH perl.c] Fixing PERL5OPT (was Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN)
Sun, 18 Feb 2001 01:11:35 -0500
[email protected] • #118
Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN
Sat, 17 Feb 2001 20:38:38 -0500
[email protected] • #117
Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN
Sat, 17 Feb 2001 17:28:51 -0800
[email protected] (Peter Scott) • #116
Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN
Sat, 17 Feb 2001 17:00:51 -0800
[email protected] (Peter Scott) • #115
Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN
Sat, 17 Feb 2001 18:13:58 -0500
[email protected] • #114
Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN (oops)
Sat, 17 Feb 2001 14:04:24 -0800
[email protected] (Edward Peschko) • #113
Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN
Sat, 17 Feb 2001 13:31:27 -0800
[email protected] (Edward Peschko) • #112
Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN
Sat, 17 Feb 2001 14:49:23 -0500
[email protected] • #111
Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN
Sat, 17 Feb 2001 11:20:00 -0800
[email protected] (Peter Scott) • #110
Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN
Sat, 17 Feb 2001 11:09:29 -0800
[email protected] (Peter Scott) • #109
Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN
Sat, 17 Feb 2001 02:47:59 -0500
[email protected] • #108
Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN
Sat, 17 Feb 2001 02:37:41 -0500
[email protected] • #107
Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN
Fri, 16 Feb 2001 22:50:49 -0800
[email protected] (Peter Scott) • #106
Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN
Fri, 16 Feb 2001 22:45:27 -0800
[email protected] (Peter Scott) • #105
Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN
Fri, 16 Feb 2001 21:03:54 -0800
[email protected] (Edward Peschko) • #104
Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN
Fri, 16 Feb 2001 23:00:29 -0500
[email protected] • #103
Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN
Fri, 16 Feb 2001 19:38:34 -0800
[email protected] (Peter Scott) • #102
Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN
Fri, 16 Feb 2001 22:13:07 -0500
[email protected] • #101
Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN
Fri, 16 Feb 2001 18:52:22 -0800
[email protected] (Peter Scott) • #100
Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN
Fri, 16 Feb 2001 21:36:33 -0500
[email protected] • #99
Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN
Fri, 16 Feb 2001 18:22:45 -0800
[email protected] (Edward Peschko) • #98
Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN
Fri, 16 Feb 2001 18:08:20 -0800
[email protected] (Peter Scott) • #97
Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN
Fri, 16 Feb 2001 17:52:29 -0800
[email protected] (Peter Scott) • #96
Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN
Fri, 16 Feb 2001 20:41:02 -0500
[email protected] • #95
Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN
Fri, 16 Feb 2001 17:34:29 -0800
[email protected] (Peter Scott) • #94
Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN
Fri, 16 Feb 2001 20:10:44 -0500
[email protected] • #93
Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN
Fri, 16 Feb 2001 15:28:36 -0800
[email protected] (Edward Peschko) • #92
Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN
Fri, 16 Feb 2001 17:33:24 -0500
[email protected] • #91
RFC 330 (v2) Global dynamic variables should remain the default
30 Sep 2000 20:07:56 -0000
[email protected] (Perl6 RFC Librarian) • #90
RFC 16 (v3) Keep default Perl free of constraints such as warnings and strict.
29 Sep 2000 21:14:29 -0000
[email protected] (Perl6 RFC Librarian) • #89
Re: RFC 330 (v1) Global dynamic variables should remain the default
Fri, 29 Sep 2000 07:30:12 -0700
[email protected] (Nathan Wiger) • #88
Re: RFC 330 (v1) Global dynamic variables should remain the default
29 Sep 2000 08:43:26 +0100
[email protected] (Piers Cawley) • #87
RFC 330 (v1) Global dynamic variables should remain the default
28 Sep 2000 20:57:01 -0000
[email protected] (Perl6 RFC Librarian) • #86
Re: RFC 106 (v2) Yet another lexical variable proposal: lexical variables made default
Wed, 27 Sep 2000 10:35:10 -0700
[email protected] (Daniel Chetlin) • #85
RFC 106 (v2) Yet another lexical variable proposal: lexical variables made default
27 Sep 2000 05:22:30 -0000
[email protected] (Perl6 RFC Librarian) • #84
RFC 6 (v3) Lexical variables made default
27 Sep 2000 05:19:18 -0000
[email protected] (Perl6 RFC Librarian) • #83
Re: RFC 16 (v2) Keep default Perl free of constraints such as warnings and strict.
18 Sep 2000 11:38:32 +0100
[email protected] (Piers Cawley) • #82
Re: RFC 16 (v2) Keep default Perl free of constraints such aswarnings and strict.
Sun, 17 Sep 2000 19:53:47 -0700
[email protected] (Nathan Wiger) • #81
Re: RFC 16 (v2) Keep default Perl free of constraints such as warnings and strict.
Sun, 17 Sep 2000 16:23:00 -0700
[email protected] (Peter Scott) • #80
Re: RFC 16 (v2) Keep default Perl free of constraints such as warnings and strict.
Sat, 16 Sep 2000 19:11:52 +0200
[email protected] (Bart Lateur) • #79
Re: RFC 16 (v2) Keep default Perl free of constraints such as warnings and strict.
Sat, 16 Sep 2000 09:39:28 -0700
[email protected] (Nathan Wiger) • #78
Re: RFC 16 (v2) Keep default Perl free of constraints such as warnings and strict.
Sat, 16 Sep 2000 10:54:09 +0200
[email protected] (Bart Lateur) • #77
RFC 16 (v2) Keep default Perl free of constraints such as warnings and strict.
16 Sep 2000 03:12:06 -0000
[email protected] (Perl6 RFC Librarian) • #76
Re: RFC 64 (v2) New pragma 'scope' to change Perl's default scoping
Tue, 29 Aug 2000 18:59:53 -0700
[email protected] (Nathan Wiger) • #75
Re: RFC 64 (v2) New pragma 'scope' to change Perl's default scoping
Tue, 29 Aug 2000 19:58:01 -0600
[email protected] (Tom Christiansen) • #74
RFC 64 (v2) New pragma 'scope' to change Perl's default scoping
30 Aug 2000 01:19:05 -0000
[email protected] (Perl6 RFC Librarian) • #73
Re: RFC 106 (v1) Yet another lexical variable proposal: lexical variables made default
Tue, 22 Aug 2000 20:31:31 +0000
[email protected] (Nick Ing-Simmons) • #72
Re: RFC 126 (v1) Ensuring Perl's object-oriented future
20 Aug 2000 00:34:23 -0400
[email protected] (Chaim Frenkel) • #71
Re: RFC 126 (v1) Ensuring Perl's object-oriented future
Fri, 18 Aug 2000 22:38:29 -0500
[email protected] ("J. David Blackstone") • #70
Re: RFC 106 (v1) Yet another lexical variable proposal: lexical variables made default
Fri, 18 Aug 2000 16:14:54 -0600 (MDT)
[email protected] (Nathan Torkington) • #69
Re: RFC 106 (v1) Yet another lexical variable proposal: lexical variables made default
18 Aug 2000 17:25:39 +0300
[email protected] (Ariel Scolnicov) • #68
Re: RFC 106 (v1) Yet another lexical variable proposal: lexical variables made default
Thu, 17 Aug 2000 21:27:08 -0700
[email protected] (Nathan Wiger) • #67
Re: language-strict WG deadline is tomorrow!
Thu, 17 Aug 2000 20:33:36 -0700
[email protected] (Nathan Wiger) • #66
Changes to RFCs
Thu, 17 Aug 2000 22:02:26 -0500
[email protected] ("J. David Blackstone") • #65
language-strict WG deadline is tomorrow!
Thu, 17 Aug 2000 20:38:07 -0500
[email protected] ("J. David Blackstone") • #64
Re: RFC 106 (v1) Yet another lexical variable proposal: lexical variables made default
Thu, 17 Aug 2000 20:32:22 -0500
[email protected] ("J. David Blackstone") • #63
Re: RFC 106 (v1) Yet another lexical variable proposal: lexical variables made default
Thu, 17 Aug 2000 18:14:15 -0700
[email protected] (Nathan Wiger) • #62
Re: RFC 106 (v1) Yet another lexical variable proposal: lexical variables made default
Thu, 17 Aug 2000 19:14:49 -0500
[email protected] ("J. David Blackstone") • #61
New level of strictness
Thu, 17 Aug 2000 18:52:56 -0500
[email protected] ("J. David Blackstone") • #60
Re: Eliminate dynamic variables entirely?
Thu, 17 Aug 2000 18:43:59 -0500
[email protected] ("J. David Blackstone") • #59
Re: RFC 106 (v1) Yet another lexical variable proposal: lexical variables made default
Thu, 17 Aug 2000 18:30:09 -0500
[email protected] ("J. David Blackstone") • #58
Re: Eliminate dynamic variables entirely?
Thu, 17 Aug 2000 17:59:44 -0500
[email protected] ("J. David Blackstone") • #57
Re: Eliminate dynamic variables entirely?
Tue, 15 Aug 2000 22:35:02 -0700
[email protected] (Nathan Wiger) • #56
Re: RFC 106 (v1) Yet another lexical variable proposal: lexical variables made default
Tue, 15 Aug 2000 19:29:17 -0600 (MDT)
[email protected] (Nathan Torkington) • #55
Re: RFC 106 (v1) Yet another lexical variable proposal: lexical variables made default
Tue, 15 Aug 2000 19:17:49 -0500
[email protected] ("J. David Blackstone") • #54
Re: Eliminate dynamic variables entirely?
16 Aug 2000 00:16:00 +0200
[email protected] ((Kai Henningsen)) • #53
RFC 106 (v1) Yet another lexical variable proposal: lexical variables made default
15 Aug 2000 20:02:46 -0000
[email protected] (Perl6 RFC Librarian) • #52
Re: RFC 106 (v1) Yet another lexical variable proposal: lexical variables made default
Tue, 15 Aug 2000 14:55:56 -0700
[email protected] (Nathan Wiger) • #51
Re: RFC 106 (v1) Yet another lexical variable proposal: lexical variables made default
Tue, 15 Aug 2000 15:31:01 -0500
[email protected] (Jonathan Scott Duff) • #50
Yet another lexical variable proposal
Tue, 15 Aug 2000 00:12:53 -0500
[email protected] ("J. David Blackstone") • #49
Re: Eliminate dynamic variables entirely?
Mon, 14 Aug 2000 23:03:14 -0500
[email protected] ("J. David Blackstone") • #48
Re: Eliminate dynamic variables entirely?
Mon, 14 Aug 2000 20:42:58 -0700
[email protected] (Nathan Wiger) • #47
Re: Eliminate dynamic variables entirely?
Mon, 14 Aug 2000 22:22:33 -0500
[email protected] ("J. David Blackstone") • #46
Re: Eliminate dynamic variables entirely?
Mon, 14 Aug 2000 19:59:44 -0700
[email protected] (Nathan Wiger) • #45
Re: Eliminate dynamic variables entirely?
Mon, 14 Aug 2000 19:52:01 -0700
[email protected] (___cliff rayman___) • #44
Re: Eliminate dynamic variables entirely?
Mon, 14 Aug 2000 19:09:49 -0700
[email protected] (Nathan Wiger) • #43
Eliminate dynamic variables entirely?
Mon, 14 Aug 2000 16:57:16 -0500
[email protected] ("J. David Blackstone") • #42
Re: Yet another proposal for lexical variables
Sun, 13 Aug 2000 14:27:55 -0700
[email protected] (Nathan Wiger) • #41
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.