perl.perl6.licenses archive

357 archived articles, newest first (page 1 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: License: Perl5 or Perl6
Thu, 03 Apr 2014 19:27:07 +0200
[email protected] (Tobias Leich) • #357
License: Perl5 or Perl6
Tue, 1 Apr 2014 21:28:13 +0200
[email protected] ("Polhodzik Peter (ext)") • #356
Norton AntiVirus detected and quarantined a virus in a message you sent.
Mon, 4 Dec 2006 08:20:42 -0600
[email protected] ("NAVMSE-ZEUS") • #355
is the AL v2 complete/finished yet
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 22:46:46 -0000
[email protected] • #354
Minor bugfix to the Artistic-2.0 proposal
Mon, 22 Oct 2001 12:31:41 -0400
[email protected] ("Bradley M. Kuhn") • #353
Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL-only (was Re: licensing issues)
Thu, 25 Jan 2001 08:50:23 -0500
[email protected] (Chris Nandor) • #352
Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL-only (was Re: licensing issues)
24 Jan 2001 18:38:29 -0000
[email protected] ("John van V") • #351
Re: Public Apology
Fri, 19 Jan 2001 09:30:59
[email protected] ("David Grove") • #350
Re: Public Apology
Fri, 19 Jan 2001 07:30:36 -0500
[email protected] ("Ben Tilly") • #349
Re: Public Apology
Fri, 19 Jan 2001 00:45:11
[email protected] ("David Grove") • #348
Public Apology
Thu, 18 Jan 2001 23:01:46 -0500
[email protected] ("Ben Tilly") • #347
Re: licensing issues
18 Jan 2001 04:57:51 -0000
[email protected] ("John van V") • #346
Re: feedback and the license of Perl (was Re: licensing issues)
Wed, 17 Jan 2001 19:57:53 -0500
[email protected] (Chris Nandor) • #345
feedback and the license of Perl (was Re: licensing issues)
Tue, 16 Jan 2001 20:04:03 -0500
[email protected] ("Bradley M. Kuhn") • #344
Re: Making sure "Perl" means "Perl" (was Re: licensing issues)
Tue, 16 Jan 2001 06:37:33 -0500
[email protected] ("Ben Tilly") • #343
Re: The "Do what you want" license and enforceability (was Re: licensing issues)
16 Jan 2001 01:17:07 -0800
[email protected] (Russ Allbery) • #342
Re: Making sure "Perl" means "Perl" (was Re: licensing issues)
16 Jan 2001 01:13:38 -0800
[email protected] (Russ Allbery) • #341
Re: licensing issues
16 Jan 2001 01:10:01 -0800
[email protected] (Russ Allbery) • #340
Re: Making sure "Perl" means "Perl" (was Re: licensing issues)
Mon, 15 Jan 2001 17:27:23 -0500
[email protected] ("Ben Tilly") • #339
Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL-only (was Re: licensing issues)
Mon, 15 Jan 2001 17:16:06 -0500
[email protected] ("Ben Tilly") • #338
Re: The "Do what you want" license and enforceability (was Re: licensing issues)
Mon, 15 Jan 2001 16:11:14
[email protected] ("David Grove") • #337
Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL-only (was Re: licensing issues)
Mon, 15 Jan 2001 17:09:17 -0500
[email protected] (Chris Nandor) • #336
The "Do what you want" license and enforceability (was Re: licensing issues)
Mon, 15 Jan 2001 16:53:06 -0500
[email protected] ("Bradley M. Kuhn") • #335
intent of a non-legally binding licensing charter (was Re: licensing issues)
Mon, 15 Jan 2001 16:48:52 -0500
[email protected] ("Bradley M. Kuhn") • #334
Re: licensing issues
Mon, 15 Jan 2001 16:46:54 -0500
[email protected] ("Bradley M. Kuhn") • #333
Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL-only (was Re: licensing issues)
Mon, 15 Jan 2001 16:42:47 -0500
[email protected] ("Bradley M. Kuhn") • #332
Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL-only (was Re: licensing issues)
Mon, 15 Jan 2001 16:36:02 -0500
[email protected] ("Bradley M. Kuhn") • #331
Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL-only (was Re: licensing issues)
Mon, 15 Jan 2001 16:34:14 -0500
[email protected] ("Bradley M. Kuhn") • #330
Re: Making sure "Perl" means "Perl" (was Re: licensing issues)
Mon, 15 Jan 2001 16:31:04 -0500
[email protected] ("Bradley M. Kuhn") • #329
Re: Why modifing the Artistic license is a good idea (was Re: licensing issues)
Mon, 15 Jan 2001 16:27:40 -0500
[email protected] ("Bradley M. Kuhn") • #328
Re: licensing issues
Mon, 15 Jan 2001 13:18:12
[email protected] ("David Grove") • #327
Re: licensing issues
Mon, 15 Jan 2001 11:37:27 -0500
[email protected] (Chris Nandor) • #326
Re: licensing issues
Mon, 15 Jan 2001 10:10:18
[email protected] ("David Grove") • #325
Re: licensing issues
Mon, 15 Jan 2001 07:55:51 -0500
[email protected] (Chris Nandor) • #324
Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL-only (was Re: licensing issues)
Mon, 15 Jan 2001 07:53:57 -0500
[email protected] (Chris Nandor) • #323
Re: licensing issues
Sun, 14 Jan 2001 22:39:22
[email protected] ("David Grove") • #322
Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL-only (was Re: licensing issues)
14 Jan 2001 19:57:48 -0800
[email protected] (Russ Allbery) • #321
Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL-only (was Re: licensing issues)
14 Jan 2001 19:55:01 -0800
[email protected] (Russ Allbery) • #320
Re: licensing issues
14 Jan 2001 19:41:57 -0800
[email protected] (Russ Allbery) • #319
Re: Making sure "Perl" means "Perl" (was Re: licensing issues)
Sun, 14 Jan 2001 18:51:52 -0500
[email protected] ("Ben Tilly") • #318
Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL-only (was Re: licensing issues)
Sun, 14 Jan 2001 18:41:59 -0500
[email protected] ("Ben Tilly") • #317
Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL-only (was Re: licensing issues)
Sun, 14 Jan 2001 15:41:03 -0700 (MST)
[email protected] (Nathan Torkington) • #316
Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL-only (was Re: licensing issues)
Sun, 14 Jan 2001 15:32:10 -0700 (MST)
[email protected] (Nathan Torkington) • #315
Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL-only (was Re: licensing issues)
Sun, 14 Jan 2001 17:41:55 -0500
[email protected] (Chris Nandor) • #314
Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL-only (was Re: licensing issues)
Sun, 14 Jan 2001 17:33:56 -0500
[email protected] (Chris Nandor) • #313
no one is asking for Perl to be GPL-only (was Re: licensing issues)
Sun, 14 Jan 2001 17:19:04 -0500
[email protected] ("Bradley M. Kuhn") • #312
Re: Why modifing the Artistic license is a good idea (was Re: licensing issues)
Sun, 14 Jan 2001 17:18:54 -0500
[email protected] (Chris Nandor) • #311
Making sure "Perl" means "Perl" (was Re: licensing issues)
Sun, 14 Jan 2001 17:08:07 -0500
[email protected] ("Bradley M. Kuhn") • #310
Please stay on topic (was Re: licensing issues)
Sun, 14 Jan 2001 17:05:42 -0500
[email protected] ("Bradley M. Kuhn") • #309
Why modifing the Artistic license is a good idea (was Re: licensing issues)
Sun, 14 Jan 2001 17:00:48 -0500
[email protected] ("Bradley M. Kuhn") • #308
Re: licensing issues
Sun, 14 Jan 2001 20:47:01 +0000
[email protected] (Nick Ing-Simmons) • #307
Re: licensing issues
Sun, 14 Jan 2001 13:34:02
[email protected] ("David Grove") • #306
Re: licensing issues
Sun, 14 Jan 2001 14:20:08 -0500
[email protected] ("Ben Tilly") • #305
Re: licensing issues
Sun, 14 Jan 2001 19:05:36 +0000
[email protected] (Nick Ing-Simmons) • #304
Re: licensing issues
Sun, 14 Jan 2001 12:35:06
[email protected] ("David Grove") • #303
Re: licensing issues
Sun, 14 Jan 2001 12:22:36 -0600 (CST)
[email protected] (Dave Rolsky) • #302
Re: licensing issues
Sun, 14 Jan 2001 12:12:23
[email protected] ("David Grove") • #301
Re: licensing issues
14 Jan 2001 18:12:31 -0000
[email protected] ("John van V") • #300
Re: licensing issues
Sun, 14 Jan 2001 15:46:56 +0000
[email protected] (Simon Cozens) • #299
Re: licensing issues
Sun, 14 Jan 2001 10:43:36 -0500
[email protected] (Chris Nandor) • #298
Re: licensing issues
Sun, 14 Jan 2001 10:27:42 -0500
[email protected] ("Ben Tilly") • #297
Re: licensing issues
Sun, 14 Jan 2001 15:27:25 +0000
[email protected] (Simon Cozens) • #296
Re: licensing issues
Sun, 14 Jan 2001 09:27:28 -0500
[email protected] (Chris Nandor) • #295
Re: licensing issues
Sun, 14 Jan 2001 09:19:59 -0500
[email protected] ("Ben Tilly") • #294
Re: licensing issues
Sun, 14 Jan 2001 13:39:16 +0000
[email protected] (Simon Cozens) • #293
non-licensing issues ?
Sun, 14 Jan 2001 11:40:07 +0000
[email protected] (Nick Ing-Simmons) • #292
Re: licensing issues
14 Jan 2001 02:17:11 -0800
[email protected] (Russ Allbery) • #291
Re: licensing issues
Sun, 14 Jan 2001 03:54:53 -0600 (CST)
[email protected] (Dave Rolsky) • #290
Re: licensing issues
Sun, 14 Jan 2001 03:27:56
[email protected] ("David Grove") • #289
Re: licensing issues
14 Jan 2001 00:23:00 +0200
[email protected] ((Kai Henningsen)) • #288
Re: licensing issues
Sat, 13 Jan 2001 08:51:21 -0500
[email protected] (Chris Nandor) • #287
Re: licensing issues
13 Jan 2001 00:05:58 -0800
[email protected] (Russ Allbery) • #286
Re: licensing issues
Fri, 12 Jan 2001 23:43:13
[email protected] ("David Grove") • #285
Re: licensing issues
Fri, 12 Jan 2001 23:25:32 -0500
[email protected] ("Ben Tilly") • #284
Re: licensing issues
Fri, 12 Jan 2001 19:47:33
[email protected] ("David Grove") • #283
Re: licensing issues
Fri, 12 Jan 2001 17:39:39 -0500
[email protected] ("Ben Tilly") • #282
Re: licensing issues
12 Jan 2001 21:43:11 -0000
[email protected] ("John van V") • #281
Re: AT&T / UWIN in violation of GNU/FSF wrt to GCC
Thu, 11 Jan 2001 00:19:50 +0000
[email protected] (Simon Cozens) • #280
Re: licensing issues
10 Jan 2001 16:01:08 -0800
[email protected] (Russ Allbery) • #279
Re: AT&T / UWIN in violation of GNU/FSF wrt to GCC
10 Jan 2001 15:55:01 -0800
[email protected] (Russ Allbery) • #278
Re: licensing issues
10 Jan 2001 16:23:09 -0000
[email protected] ("John van V") • #277
Re: AT&T / UWIN in violation of GNU/FSF wrt to GCC
Wed, 10 Jan 2001 10:56:34 -0500
[email protected] ("Ben Tilly") • #276
AT&T / UWIN in violation of GNU/FSF wrt to GCC
10 Jan 2001 15:32:48 -0000
[email protected] ("John van V") • #275
Re: licensing issues
Tue, 9 Jan 2001 23:46:36 -0500
[email protected] ("Bradley M. Kuhn") • #274
Re: licensing issues
9 Jan 2001 22:45:22 -0000
[email protected] ("John van V") • #273
Re: licensing issues
9 Jan 2001 20:29:03 -0000
[email protected] ("John van V") • #272
Re: licensing issues
Tue, 9 Jan 2001 10:55:39 -0500
[email protected] (Chris Nandor) • #271
Re: licensing issues
Tue, 9 Jan 2001 01:01:51 -0500
[email protected] ("Bradley M. Kuhn") • #270
Re: licensing issues
Tue, 9 Jan 2001 01:01:04 -0500
[email protected] ("Bradley M. Kuhn") • #269
Re: licensing issues
Tue, 9 Jan 2001 00:59:06 -0500
[email protected] ("Bradley M. Kuhn") • #268
Re: licensing issues
Mon, 8 Jan 2001 15:51:48 -0600
[email protected] (Jarkko Hietaniemi) • #267
Re: licensing issues
Mon, 08 Jan 2001 13:24:06
[email protected] ("David Grove") • #266
Re: licensing issues
Mon, 8 Jan 2001 02:54:30 +0000
[email protected] (Simon Cozens) • #265
Re: licensing issues
Sun, 7 Jan 2001 20:27:21 -0600
[email protected] (Jarkko Hietaniemi) • #264
Re: licensing issues
Sun, 7 Jan 2001 21:21:13 -0500
[email protected] ("Bradley M. Kuhn") • #263
Re: licensing issues
Sun, 7 Jan 2001 14:52:08 -0500
[email protected] (Chris Nandor) • #262
Re: licensing issues
Fri, 05 Jan 2001 15:32:15 -0500
[email protected] (Dan Sugalski) • #261
Re: licensing issues
5 Jan 2001 20:18:36 -0000
[email protected] ("John van V") • #260
public domain? (was Re: standard representations)
Fri, 5 Jan 2001 14:34:09 -0500
[email protected] ("Bradley M. Kuhn") • #259
licensing issues (was Re: standard representations)
Fri, 5 Jan 2001 14:28:35 -0500
[email protected] ("Bradley M. Kuhn") • #258
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.