perl.perl6.stdlib archive

226 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 3). Latest articles →

RFC 349 (v1) Perl modules should be built with a Perl make program
29 Sep 2000 21:45:04 -0000
[email protected] (Perl6 RFC Librarian) • #126
RFC 333 (v2) Add C<header> and C<unheader> funtions to core distribution
29 Sep 2000 21:22:38 -0000
[email protected] (Perl6 RFC Librarian) • #125
RFC 289 (v2) Generate module dependencies easily
27 Sep 2000 07:37:02 -0000
[email protected] (Perl6 RFC Librarian) • #124
RFC 286 (v2) Add a "emit pod" runtime option to Perl
27 Sep 2000 07:36:11 -0000
[email protected] (Perl6 RFC Librarian) • #123
Re: RFC 289 (v1) Generate module dependencies easily
Tue, 26 Sep 2000 00:26:54 -0400
[email protected] (Adam Turoff) • #122
RFC 291 (v1) Detecting Perl Core Modules Should Be Easy
25 Sep 2000 19:34:04 -0000
[email protected] (Perl6 RFC Librarian) • #121
Re: RFC 289 (v1) Generate module dependencies easily
Mon, 25 Sep 2000 02:56:20 -0500
[email protected] ("Curtis Jewell") • #120
RFC 289 (v1) Generate module dependencies easily
25 Sep 2000 06:02:25 -0000
[email protected] (Perl6 RFC Librarian) • #119
RFC 286 (v1) Add a "emit pod" runtime option to Perl
25 Sep 2000 06:00:35 -0000
[email protected] (Perl6 RFC Librarian) • #118
Re: RFC 260 (v1) More modules
22 Sep 2000 16:43:22 -0400
[email protected] (Chaim Frenkel) • #117
Re: RFC 260 (v1) More modules
21 Sep 2000 23:17:54 -0400
[email protected] (Chaim Frenkel) • #116
Re: RFC 260 (v1) More modules
21 Sep 2000 23:12:03 -0400
[email protected] (Chaim Frenkel) • #115
Re: RFC 260 (v1) More modules
Thu, 21 Sep 2000 10:23:33 -0600
[email protected] (Tom Christiansen) • #114
RE: RFC 260 (v1) More modules
Thu, 21 Sep 2000 11:12:19 -0500
[email protected] (Garrett Goebel) • #113
Re: RFC 260 (v1) More modules
Thu, 21 Sep 2000 12:13:14 -0400 (EDT)
[email protected] (Andy Dougherty) • #112
Re: RFC 260 (v1) More modules
Thu, 21 Sep 2000 11:49:14 -0400
[email protected] (Michael G Schwern) • #111
Re: RFC 260 (v1) More modules
Thu, 21 Sep 2000 11:34:10 -0400 (EDT)
[email protected] (Andy Dougherty) • #110
Re: RFC 260 (v1) More modules
Thu, 21 Sep 2000 09:12:11 -0600
[email protected] (Tom Christiansen) • #109
Re: RFC 260 (v1) More modules
Thu, 21 Sep 2000 10:24:51 -0400
[email protected] ("Nathan V. Patwardhan") • #108
RE: RFC 260 (v1) More modules
Thu, 21 Sep 2000 09:08:49 -0500
[email protected] (Garrett Goebel) • #107
Re: RFC 260 (v1) More modules
Thu, 21 Sep 2000 12:23:25 +0200
[email protected] (Bart Lateur) • #106
Re: RFC 260 (v1) More modules
Thu, 21 Sep 2000 03:29:14 -0400
[email protected] (Michael G Schwern) • #105
Re: RFC 260 (v1) More modules
20 Sep 2000 19:37:37 -0400
[email protected] (Chaim Frenkel) • #104
RE: RFC 260 (v1) More modules
Wed, 20 Sep 2000 15:12:15 -0500
[email protected] (Garrett Goebel) • #103
Re: RFC 260 (v1) More modules
Wed, 20 Sep 2000 13:54:07 -0400 (EDT)
[email protected] ("Casey R. Tweten") • #102
Re: RFC 260 (v1) More modules
20 Sep 2000 13:36:23 -0400
[email protected] (Chaim Frenkel) • #101
Re: RFC 260 (v1) More modules
Wed, 20 Sep 2000 09:33:20 -0400 (EDT)
[email protected] (Andy Dougherty) • #100
Re: RFC 260 (v1) More modules
Tue, 19 Sep 2000 21:21:29 -0600
[email protected] (Tom Christiansen) • #99
Re: RFC 260 (v1) More modules
19 Sep 2000 23:17:20 -0400
[email protected] (Chaim Frenkel) • #98
Re: RFC 260 (v1) More modules
Tue, 19 Sep 2000 20:28:41 -0600
[email protected] (Tom Christiansen) • #97
Re: RFC 233 (v1) Replace Exporter by a better scaling mechanism
Tue, 19 Sep 2000 21:59:06 -0400
[email protected] (Ilya Zakharevich) • #96
Re: RFC 260 (v1) More modules
Tue, 19 Sep 2000 20:18:52 -0400 (EDT)
[email protected] (Andy Dougherty) • #95
Re: RFC 260 (v1) More modules
Tue, 19 Sep 2000 20:03:59 -0400
[email protected] (Adam Turoff) • #94
Re: RFC 260 (v1) More modules
Tue, 19 Sep 2000 18:49:20 -0500
[email protected] ("Curtis Jewell") • #93
Re: RFC 260 (v1) More modules
Tue, 19 Sep 2000 15:13:48 -0600
[email protected] (Tom Christiansen) • #92
Re: RFC 260 (v1) More modules
Tue, 19 Sep 2000 21:08:36 +0100
[email protected] (Graham Barr) • #91
Re: RFC 260 (v1) More modules
Tue, 19 Sep 2000 16:08:21 -0400
[email protected] (Adam Turoff) • #90
Re: RFC 260 (v1) More modules
Tue, 19 Sep 2000 14:09:14 -0500 (CDT)
[email protected] (Dave Rolsky) • #89
RFC 260 (v1) More modules
19 Sep 2000 19:41:20 -0000
[email protected] (Perl6 RFC Librarian) • #88
Re: RFC 228 (v2) Add memoize into the standard library
Tue, 19 Sep 2000 14:20:29 +0100
[email protected] (Graham Barr) • #87
RFC 228 (v2) Add memoize into the standard library
19 Sep 2000 06:57:07 -0000
[email protected] (Perl6 RFC Librarian) • #86
Re: RFC 228 (v1) Add memoize into the standard library
18 Sep 2000 14:17:55 +0100
[email protected] (Piers Cawley) • #85
Re: RFC 233 (v1) Replace Exporter by a better scaling mechanism
Sat, 16 Sep 2000 10:37:54 -0400
[email protected] ("Michael Maraist") • #84
taint pragma
Fri, 15 Sep 2000 17:54:49 -0400
[email protected] (Adam Turoff) • #83
Re: RFC 228 (v1) Add memoize into the standard library
Fri, 15 Sep 2000 21:35:54 +0200
[email protected] (Bart Lateur) • #82
RFC 233 (v1) Replace Exporter by a better scaling mechanism
15 Sep 2000 19:25:00 -0000
[email protected] (Perl6 RFC Librarian) • #81
Re: RFC 228 (v1) Add memoize into the standard library
Fri, 15 Sep 2000 13:40:54 -0400
[email protected] (Adam Turoff) • #80
Re: RFC 228 (v1) Add memoize into the standard library
Fri, 15 Sep 2000 16:26:07 +0100
[email protected] (Leon Brocard) • #79
Re: RFC 228 (v1) Add memoize into the standard library
Fri, 15 Sep 2000 08:28:30 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] (Dave Storrs) • #78
Re: RFC 228 (v1) Add memoize into the standard library
Fri, 15 Sep 2000 10:21:58 +0200
[email protected] (Bart Lateur) • #77
RFC 228 (v1) Add memoize into the standard library
15 Sep 2000 02:09:23 -0000
[email protected] (Perl6 RFC Librarian) • #76
Re: RFC 216 (v1) POD should tolerate white space.
Wed, 13 Sep 2000 09:55:31 -0700
[email protected] (Peter Scott) • #75
Re: RFC 216 (v1) POD should tolerate white space.
Wed, 13 Sep 2000 09:19:25 -0700
[email protected] (Peter Scott) • #74
Re: RFC 216 (v1) POD should tolerate white space.
Wed, 13 Sep 2000 10:38:44 -0400
[email protected] (John Porter) • #73
Re: RFC 216 (v1) POD should tolerate white space.
Wed, 13 Sep 2000 09:37:57 -0400 (EDT)
[email protected] (Andy Dougherty) • #72
Re: perl 5.6.0 stdlib stats
Mon, 11 Sep 2000 13:41:13 +0100
[email protected] (Graham Barr) • #71
Re: perl 5.6.0 stdlib stats
Mon, 11 Sep 2000 06:37:26 -0600
[email protected] (Tom Christiansen) • #70
Re: perl 5.6.0 stdlib stats
Mon, 11 Sep 2000 13:35:45 +0100 (BST)
[email protected] (John Berthels) • #69
Re: perl 5.6.0 stdlib stats
Mon, 11 Sep 2000 09:27:34 +0100
[email protected] (Graham Barr) • #68
Re: perl 5.6.0 stdlib stats
Sun, 10 Sep 2000 09:54:25 -0600 (MDT)
[email protected] (Nathan Torkington) • #67
perl 5.6.0 stdlib stats
Sun, 10 Sep 2000 12:48:24 +0100
[email protected] (Leon Brocard) • #66
Re: Proposal: use Perl5
Thu, 31 Aug 2000 14:49:30 +1000
[email protected] • #65
Re: How to implement both object->method and module::function interface?
Thu, 17 Aug 2000 21:12:31 -0500
[email protected] ("David L. Nicol") • #64
Re: How to implement both object->method and module::function interface?
Wed, 16 Aug 2000 15:25:46 +0100
[email protected] (Tim Bunce) • #63
Re: How to implement both object->method and module::function interface?
Wed, 16 Aug 2000 11:50:23 +0100 (BST)
[email protected] (John Berthels) • #62
Re: How to implement both object->method and module::function interface?
Wed, 16 Aug 2000 09:08:32 +0100
[email protected] (Graham Barr) • #61
Re: How to implement both object->method and module::function interface?
Wed, 16 Aug 2000 09:09:50 +0100
[email protected] (Graham Barr) • #60
Re: How to implement both object->method and module::function interface?
Wed, 16 Aug 2000 09:11:21 +0100
[email protected] (Graham Barr) • #59
Re: How to implement both object->method and module::function interface?
Tue, 15 Aug 2000 16:59:19 -0800
[email protected] (Michael Fowler) • #58
Re: How to implement both object->method and module::function interface?
Tue, 15 Aug 2000 12:33:15 +0100
[email protected] (Tim Bunce) • #57
Re: How to implement both object->method and module::function interface?
15 Aug 2000 15:17:36 -0400
[email protected] (Chaim Frenkel) • #56
Re: How to implement both object->method and module::function interface?
Tue, 15 Aug 2000 15:28:34 +0100
[email protected] (Graham Barr) • #55
Re: How to implement both object->method and module::function interface?
15 Aug 2000 10:14:36 -0400
[email protected] (Chaim Frenkel) • #54
Re: How to implement both object->method and module::function interface?
Tue, 15 Aug 2000 11:12:44 +0100
[email protected] (Graham Barr) • #53
SSH functionality for PERL
Tue, 15 Aug 2000 10:04:39 +0300
[email protected] ("Roman M . Parparov") • #52
Re: How to implement both object->method and module::function interface?
Mon, 14 Aug 2000 11:30:28 -0500
[email protected] (Jonathan Scott Duff) • #51
Re: How to implement both object->method and module::function interface?
Mon, 14 Aug 2000 11:13:38 +0100 (BST)
[email protected] (John Berthels) • #50
RE: Define consistent and standard
Fri, 11 Aug 2000 10:17:31 -0500
[email protected] (Garrett Goebel) • #49
Re: Define consistent and standard
Fri, 11 Aug 2000 15:51:30 +1000
[email protected] • #48
Re: How to implement both object->method and module::function interfa ce?
09 Aug 2000 10:07:21 -0400
[email protected] (Chaim Frenkel) • #47
Re: How to implement both object->method and module::function interfa ce?
Wed, 09 Aug 2000 17:13:42 +0100
[email protected] (Hildo Biersma) • #46
Re: How to implement both object->method and module::function interface?
Wed, 09 Aug 2000 15:43:42 +0200
[email protected] (Bart Lateur) • #45
Re: How to implement both object->method and module::function interface?
Wed, 9 Aug 2000 14:36:02 +0100
[email protected] (Graham Barr) • #44
Re: How to implement both object->method and module::function interface?
Wed, 9 Aug 2000 14:26:25 +0100
[email protected] (Graham Barr) • #43
Re: How to implement both object->method and module::function interface?
Wed, 09 Aug 2000 15:26:56 +0200
[email protected] (Bart Lateur) • #42
Re: How to implement both object->method and module::function interface?
Wed, 09 Aug 2000 13:58:34 +0100
[email protected] (Hildo Biersma) • #41
Re: How to implement both object->method and module::function interface?
Wed, 09 Aug 2000 14:08:09 +0200
[email protected] (Bart Lateur) • #40
Re: How to implement both object->method and module::function interface?
Wed, 9 Aug 2000 12:04:46 +0100
[email protected] (Graham Barr) • #39
Re: How to implement both object->method and module::function interface?
Wed, 09 Aug 2000 11:41:20 +0100
[email protected] (Hildo Biersma) • #38
Re: How to implement both object->method and module::function interfa ce?
Wed, 9 Aug 2000 06:29:57 -0400 (EDT)
[email protected] (Philip Newton) • #37
Re: How to implement both object->method and module::function interfa ce?
Wed, 09 Aug 2000 10:50:10 +0100
[email protected] (Hildo Biersma) • #36
Re: How to implement both object->method and module::function interfa ce?
Wed, 9 Aug 2000 01:24:12 -0800
[email protected] (Michael Fowler) • #35
Re: How to implement both object->method and module::function interfa ce?
Wed, 9 Aug 2000 10:05:34 +0100
[email protected] (Graham Barr) • #34
Re: How to implement both object->method and module::function interfa ce?
Wed, 9 Aug 2000 10:03:32 +0100
[email protected] (Graham Barr) • #33
Re: CGI debugging environment
Wed, 09 Aug 2000 09:10:43 +0100
[email protected] (Hildo Biersma) • #32
CGI debugging environment
Wed, 9 Aug 2000 10:48:12 +0300
[email protected] ("Roman M . Parparov") • #31
Re: How to implement both object->method and module::function interfa ce?
Wed, 09 Aug 2000 08:40:32 +0100
[email protected] (Hildo Biersma) • #30
Re: How to implement both object->method and module::function interfa ce?
Tue, 8 Aug 2000 17:00:53 -0500
[email protected] (Jonathan Scott Duff) • #29
Re: How to implement both object->method and module::function interfa ce?
Tue, 8 Aug 2000 13:47:48 -0800
[email protected] (Michael Fowler) • #28
Re: How to implement both object->method and module::function interfa ce?
Tue, 08 Aug 2000 20:30:38 +0000
[email protected] (Nick Ing-Simmons) • #27
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.