Re: Remove alt.checkmate from your banlist immediately.

Steve <[email protected]> wrote:

> Sn!pe wrote:
> > 
> > Steve <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> > > Nadegda wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> > > > On Sun, 19 Dec 2021 13:44:39 +0000, Steve wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > Worf (Paul Derbyshire)
> > > > 
> > > > Proof, kook?
> > > 
> > > Caught cock in hand and you still want proof?
> > > I don't need to provide proof. Nobody but one of your socks would
> > > try to defend you. One comes along out of the blue to defend 
> > > 'Kensi' and then along comes your Nads sock to defend the other 
> > > sock. Classic and totally predictable Paul Derbyshire behaviour.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > > Erroneously presupposes that an IP address is as good as a birth
> > > > > certificate. In reality, the most an IP will normally tell you is
> > > > > that a post came from a particular city, petaQ. To assert on that
> > > > > basis that it was one particular person among teeming millions is
> > > > > to claim to have psychic powers.
> > > > 
> > > > Oh I see. You're sore because you got SPNAKed,
> > > 
> > > Oh grow up you pathetic git. You haven't spanked me. You've done 
> > > fuck all to me. The only power you have is limited to your fantasy
> > > world.
> > > 
> > > > and your go-to move
> > > > is to accuse anybody who humiliates you of being this "Paul" person.
> > > > I guess you feel that doing so somehow grants you power over them,
> > > > even though it does nothing of the kind and they will continue on
> > > > about their lives completely unperturbed.
> > > 
> > > You only humiliate yourself and irritate everyone else. 'Kensi' has
> > > been posting for about 10 days with his IP exposed and 
> > > coincidentally (ho ho) it's a Pembroke IP, that's where Paul 
> > > Derbyshire resides. Funny that, innit?
> > > And you, his 'Nadegda' sock are running scared from Ray Banana's 
> > > semi veiled threat to expose you. That's hilarious, too. Innit.
> > > 
> > > <quote Ray's post>
> > > 
> > > Subject: Re: PING: Steve Crook
> > > From: Ray Banana <[email protected]>
> > > Organization: A noiseless patient spider
> > > User-Agent: Plonkenlights
> > > Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> > > Newsgroups: alt.free.newsservers
> > > 
> > > On 10336 September 1993, Nadegda wrote:
> > > 
> > > > ... says a kook who posts through E-S, a server that hides his IP
> > > > address just like mixmin (normally) does.
> > > 
> > > Using a different approach, I'm able to switch off IP address
> > > obfuscation based on user names. Want a proof, kook?
> > > 
> > > </quote Ray's post>
> > > 
> > > Are you going to dare him to do it, chickenshit Paul?
> > >
> > 
> > The most convincing thing Nadgeda could do would be to call Ray's bluff
> > (not that it's a bluff).  Paul Derbyshire would never dare to challenge
> > Ray knowing that he would inevitably be exposed.  Besides, Paul runs his
> > other "well behaved" sockpuppet on Eternal-September too; he wouldn't
> > want to expose that in the process.  
> > 
> > Nadgeda can easily defeat all these allegations simply by asking Ray
> > to do his thing.  I'd bet the farm that Nadge won't, though.
> >
>
> No, of course he won't.
> Regarding the other guy. I'm not convinced that is Derbyshite. Other 
> than sharing a first name there is no similarity in posting style 
> and he seems helpful, open and completely non-confrontational. As an 
> example I remember Ray asking him once if his modified newsreader 
> (Ratcatcher) was Thunderbird and *that* Paul answered it was. 
> Derbyshite would never admit to that. He never fesses up to 
> anything.
>

I've been paying close attention to that persona for a while; 
I'm 95% convinced that it's Derbyshire.  Maybe we'll find out...  

Nah, I don't think so either. 

-- 
^Ï^     <https://youtu.be/_kqytf31a8E>

My pet rock Gordon just is.