Re: Remove alt.checkmate from your banlist immediately.

Nadegda wrote:
> 
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 20:17:50 +0000, Steve wrote:
> 
> > Nadegda wrote:
> >
> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> >> On Sun, 19 Dec 2021 13:44:39 +0000, Steve wrote:
> >> 
> >> > Worf (Paul Derbyshire)
> >> 
> >> Proof, kook?
> > 
> > Caught cock in hand
> 
> Please to be pointing to where Worf was "caught". MID, link, etc.
> 
> > and you still want proof?
> 
> You asserted that Worf was this Derbyshire person. Yours is the
> burden of proof if challenged to substantiate that claim.
> 
> > I don't need to provide proof.
> 
> You do if you want anyone to believe your random-seeming claims
> that assorted people are Derbyshire, kooky.
> 
> > Nobody but one of your socks would 
> > try to defend you. One comes along out of the blue to defend 
> > 'Kensi' and then along comes your Nads sock to defend the other 
> > sock. Classic and totally predictable Paul Derbyshire behaviour.
> 
> Circular "reasoning": anyone who has ever sided with anyone you've
> ever claimed is a "Derbyshire sock" is also a "Derbyshire sock".
> Combine with six degrees of separation and *everyone* on Usenet is a
> "Derbyshire sock" by your criteria. Including you.
> 
> >> > Erroneously presupposes that an IP address is as good as a birth
> >> > certificate. In reality, the most an IP will normally tell you is
> >> > that a post came from a particular city, petaQ. To assert on that
> >> > basis that it was one particular person among teeming millions is
> >> > to claim to have psychic powers.
> >> 
> >> Oh I see. You're sore because you got SPNAKed,
> > 
> > Oh grow up you pathetic git. You haven't spanked me. You've done 
> > fuck all to me. The only power you have is limited to your fantasy 
> > world.
> 
> By the same argument, the only power *you* have is limited to *your*
> fantasy world.
> 
> At least I can distinguish between mine and reality. Neener.
> 
> <snicker>
> 
> >> and your go-to move
> >> is to accuse anybody who humiliates you of being this "Paul" person.
> >> I guess you feel that doing so somehow grants you power over them,
> >> even though it does nothing of the kind and they will continue on
> >> about their lives completely unperturbed.
> > 
> > You only humiliate yourself and irritate everyone else.
> 
> And what do you think *you've* been doing? You're known far and wide
> as "that kook who posts about nothing else than his Derbyshire
> obsession, year after year after year". Tell me, when was the last
> time you contributed anything actually useful to any newsgroup?
> All I've ever seen you do is flog your pet theory with nearly as
> much persistence as your garden variety spammer flogging a dubious
> product or service, if, thankfully, a much lower posting volume. If
> you ever ran for office it would be as a single-issue candidate, and
> you'd get about the same number of votes as the UFO-truther candidate
> and the ban-videogames candidate.
> 
> > 'Kensi' has been posting for about 10 days with his
> 
> Her!

Blah, blah, bluster, bluster. Same tired old denial.
I note yet again you've snipped what you can't deal with, and I 
think everyone else reading this will have noticed that too.
Crosspost restored for archive purposes.
Chickenshit.

PS. Show us yer tits, Paul!