Re: Rogue cancel from miakibot

On 5/4/2022 6:08 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> Paul a émis l'idée suivante :
>> On 5/4/2022 6:07 AM, [email protected] wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I hope it's the good groop for this plaint.
>>>
>>> Your server accept since few days the cancels from "miakibot2".
>>>
>>> A lot of cancel from this robot is not legitimate cancel.
>>> But it's a cancel war againt one person.
>>> A lot of French users are not for these cancels which are not consensual
>>>
>>> You should know that that the "miakibot" has already deleted last year
>>> more than 3600 messages from another person (Pierre) in a very abusive
>>> way. This time his target is "Neo".
>>>
>>> Please, block these cancellations of the miakibot of which a great part
>>> is abusive or block the cancellations of the servers from which these
>>> abusive cancellations come from (server ALPHANET which does not want to
>>> do anything and produce)
>>>
>>> sincerely yours,
>>>
>>> Examples of recent abusives cancels:
>>>
>>> Message-ID:
>>> <[email protected]>
>>> <[email protected]>
>>
>> You want eternal-september.org
>>
>> The address for correspondence/email is:
>>
>>      mail-complaints-to = "[email protected]"
>>
>> ******************************************************
>>
>> http://al.howardknight.net/?STYPE=msgid&MSGI=%3Ct4h2np%2418b%241%40dont-email.me%3E
>>
>>     Message-ID: <[email protected]>
>>
>>     Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="567ad90b4411d4bd307d983d52254db1";
>>        logging-data="1291"; mail-complaints-to="[email protected]";    posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/8bpji8EfGproVjviyQY8m"
>>     User-Agent: MacCafe/2.07 (4D18) (macOS 12.3.1 (21E258) - iMac18,3)
>>
>>     Cancel-Lock: sha1:Td+2MwxvrwXpMoggioJJMbqSdR0=                    \
>>                  sha256:OVzsl0bFZRe8ztbKy3K5lwze9EBUmN29DL0/HTMK1LY=   \___ This is not normal
>>             sha1:H8zxdiknN5VL6cy1IDbFMe6TrQs=                     /
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Control_message
>>
>> https://web.archive.org/web/20070502013009/http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-usefor-cancel-lock-01
>>
>>       "3.1  Adding an initial "Cancel-Lock: " header to a proto-article... <=== Does not explain it
>>
>> Your client did not add excess cancel-locks to your complaint message.
>>
>> As a result, perhaps try posting via AIOE and see if the cancelbot and
>> Rogue Server in the path, are damaging posts in that sequence
>> as well (somehow). AIOE does not appear to be adding a
>> Cancel-Lock header, and your posting might well survive.
>>
>> Info posted on your cancel itself.
>>
>> https://groups.google.com/g/fr.soc.politique/c/7O4QLZ9mM20/m/Omasx5f2AAAJ
>>
>>     Paul
> 
> I am not sure to understand excatly what you said.
> I make a test to send a message from AIOE
> It was cancelled by the miakibot to.
> 
> The rogue cancel message:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Path: aioe.org!news.alphanet.ch!alphanet.ch!miakibot!byreferences!cyberspam!not-for-mail
> From: miakibot3 <[email protected]>
> Organization: miakibot
> Subject: cmsg cancel <uls57hta1s6esuhq50tat486a4estpq2et@consensus-omnium>
> Control: cancel <uls57hta1s6esuhq50tat486a4estpq2et@consensus-omnium>
> Date: Wed, 04 May 2022 23:42:15 +0200
> Archive: No
> X-No-Archive: Yes
> Message-ID: <cancel.uls57hta1s6esuhq50tat486a4estpq2et@consensus-omnium>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> Followup-To: poster
> X-Original-From: LaLibreParole <[email protected]>
> Newsgroups: fr.usenet.abus.d
> X-Original-Subject: Re: La philosophie du cancel sur Usenet
> X-Original-Date: Wed, 04 May 2022 23:40:25 +0200
> X-Original-Message-ID: <uls57hta1s6esuhq50tat486a4estpq2et@consensus-omnium>
> Xref: aioe.org control.cancel:1582821
> 
> Response to a cancelled article (byreferences)
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> I Think the problem is not the source message, or cancel-lock but
> the acceptance of the rogue cancel from ALPHANET server,
> The abusive user on this serveur is: "<[email protected]>"
> 
> But the ALPHANET server promote these rogues cancels.
> This is why i write to server which newly accept these abusives
> cancels of the miakibot2 or miakibot3.
> Until April 29 or 30 "aioe" did not accept these cancels.
> But now "aioe" accept them.
> Plesae, stop to accept these rogues cancels.
> 
> sincerely yours,

Maybe Paolo can have a look at this one.

I would be surprised if Cancel was left blowing in the breeze
and uncontrolled.

http://al.howardknight.net/?STYPE=msgid&MSGI=+%3Culs57hta1s6esuhq50tat486a4estpq2et%40consensus-omnium%3E

Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!w17zEAFnflhCkP7jBwzYiQ.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: LaLibreParole  <[email protected]>
Newsgroups: fr.usenet.abus.d
Subject: Re: La philosophie du cancel sur Usenet
Date: Wed, 04 May 2022 23:40:25 +0200
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <uls57hta1s6esuhq50tat486a4estpq2et@consensus-omnium>
References: <[email protected]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="21633"; posting-host="w17zEAFnflhCkP7jBwzYiQ.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="[email protected]";
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
Bytes: 836
Lines: 0

Test