Re: Federal judge rules Alabama city must allow gay pride float at Christmas parade
Klaus Schadenfreude <[email protected]> Thu, 26 Dec 2024 11:37:01 -0800
| Newsgroups | alt.law-enforcement.corruption,alabama.politics,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,sac.politics,talk.politics.guns,alt.politics.homosexuality |
|---|---|
| Organization | Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price! www.newshosting.com |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 12/26/2024 9:08 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied: > > > "Klaus Schadenfreude" <[email protected]> wrote in message > news:[email protected]... >> On 12/25/2024 11:28 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless >> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied: >> >>> >>> >>> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>> news:[email protected]... >>>> On 12/10/2024 11:00 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless >>>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>> news:[email protected]... >>>>>> On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 09:06:21 -0600, "Scout" >>>>>>> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <[email protected]> wrote >>>>>>>> On 12/9/2024 8:20 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless >>>>>>>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied: >>>>>>>>> "useapen" <[email protected]> wrote >>>>>> <snip> >>>>>>>>>> The ruling required the city to provide at least two police officers to >>>>>>>>>> escort the float throughout the parade. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'm sorry, but unless ALL floats get an escort of 2 police officers >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> No, scooter. The other floats and parade entries are not at risk of being >>>>>>>> attacked >>>>>>> >>>>>>> How would you know which floats are at risk? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Beside, the issue isn't the risk.. it's the DISCRIMINATION. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I mean don't ALL floats deserve a police escort? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why should THIS float get such a special honor? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sounds like discrimination. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> See, they don't mind discrimination, they just want discrimination to favor >>>>>>> them. >>>>>> >>>>>> Why should low crime areas get police protection? They don't need it. They >>>>>> don't have crime. >>>>> >>>>> Are you suggest [sic] a parade float is a "high crime area"? >>>> No, scooter, he's not "suggest" that. But that one float is at *known* risk >>>> for attack by you and your mob. >>> >>> Please produce your evidence that float is at a "known" risk of attack from >>> my or any mobs of mine. >> >> The police department already did that. Ask them. > > Apparently they didn't They did, scooter. > or they would automatically provide protection. No, scooter. The city *denied* the float organizers a permit for the float because of the city's determination that the float might incite a violent attack by your fellows. > The fact that people are trying to force them to do so, They have no choice, scooter. > would seem to indicate they don't consider the danger to be creditable [sic] *credible*, scooter, not "creditable." That's another scooterism. "Creditable" is not a synonym for "credible," scooter. "Creditable" means something is worthy of praise or deserving credit. It does not mean "believable," scooter.