Re: Federal judge rules Alabama city must allow gay pride float at Christmas parade
"Scout" <[email protected]> Thu, 26 Dec 2024 17:53:21 -0600
| Newsgroups | alabama.politics,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,talk.politics.guns,alt.politics.homosexuality |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... > On 12/26/2024 9:08 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless > chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied: > >> >> >> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <[email protected]> wrote in message >> news:[email protected]... >>> On 12/25/2024 11:28 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless >>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>> news:[email protected]... >>>>> On 12/10/2024 11:00 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and >>>>> gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "Governor Swill" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>>> news:[email protected]... >>>>>>> On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 09:06:21 -0600, "Scout" >>>>>>>> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <[email protected]> wrote >>>>>>>>> On 12/9/2024 8:20 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and >>>>>>>>> gutless >>>>>>>>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied: >>>>>>>>>> "useapen" <[email protected]> wrote >>>>>>> <snip> >>>>>>>>>>> The ruling required the city to provide at least two police >>>>>>>>>>> officers to >>>>>>>>>>> escort the float throughout the parade. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I'm sorry, but unless ALL floats get an escort of 2 police >>>>>>>>>> officers >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> No, scooter. The other floats and parade entries are not at risk >>>>>>>>> of being >>>>>>>>> attacked >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> How would you know which floats are at risk? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Beside, the issue isn't the risk.. it's the DISCRIMINATION. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I mean don't ALL floats deserve a police escort? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Why should THIS float get such a special honor? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sounds like discrimination. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> See, they don't mind discrimination, they just want discrimination >>>>>>>> to favor >>>>>>>> them. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why should low crime areas get police protection? They don't need >>>>>>> it. They >>>>>>> don't have crime. >>>>>> >>>>>> Are you suggest [sic] a parade float is a "high crime area"? >>>>> No, scooter, he's not "suggest" that. But that one float is at *known* >>>>> risk for attack by you and your mob. >>>> >>>> Please produce your evidence that float is at a "known" risk of attack >>>> from my or any mobs of mine. >>> >>> The police department already did that. Ask them. >> >> Apparently they didn't or > > They did, scooter. The police department is the entity that made the > determination that there was a risk of violence. True, but then there is ALWAYS a risk of violence. The real question is whether that risk is creditable and actionable. Which determination is totally within the purview of the police department. If those running the float feel otherwise, they are always free to hire their own private security. >>>> Further if they are in such danger maybe they should stay home or hire >>>> private security. >>> >>> No, that's allowing you terrorists to win, scooter. >> >> Well, > > Another scooterism: empty meaningless wheeze. Rudy already inventing excuses to ignore what he's being told. >> then they accept the danger. > > They didn't get that option, scooter — they were *denied* a permit. Which apparently had nothing to do with any threats, and thus is a moot issue in this context.