Re: Man Drops Dead - After Getting Vaxxed

"Vincent Maycock" wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> "Andrew"wrote:
>>"Vincent Maycock" wrote:    
>>
>><<>>
>>
>>> the fossil record is quite suggestive of evolution.  
>>
>>Here Vince admits, it is only "suggestive".
> 
> No, not "only" suggestive, "quite" suggestive.   

Still no proof, however it IS "quite" suggestive he says, 
((for those who possess powers to *fantasize*)).

Lol!

> How would you feel if someone said that the 
> evidence is quite suggestive that you are pedophile? 

But they have.no evidence. Just like you.

>>Yet he believes as if~ it were the actual TRUTH.  
> 
> That appears to be what it is, yeah.

It "appears" to be "truth"..

In his "fantasy".  

Lol"

>>Vince is a "believer" along with the gullible masses
>>who don's think for themselves, but simply believe
>>what they were told.
> 
> I was raised a creationist, and was told what to
> believe by my creationist family. 

They never taught you to THINK for yourself?

How sad. However, now as an adult, you have
the moral and personal responsibility to do so.

> When I got into my teens, I thought for myself

Cool!

> and concluded that the YEC position was scientifically 
> untenable, and upset their little apple cart. 

In other words you became brain-washed when
you went to that institution. Not realizing that
they deceived you.

>>> Notable examples of this include...
>>
>>Now he is going to provide evidence of his gullibility
>>by citing, not science, but what someone fantasized
> 
> How can you be so sure that it's "fantasized"?  

Because there's a *big difference* between science
and fantasy. Which you obviously failed to learn at
the institution you went to.

> Just because it demolishes your religion?  Maybe it's
> your religion that's fantasized, and the science is right! 

Your non-theistic religion requires more faith than mine.

>> in some book that he read!   
> 
> Books, plural.  

So the fantasy that Vince believes in is found in more
than one book. Therefore he thinks it is enough for it
to be true.

Must be true, he says. 

> I've been interested in fossils (specifically
> vertebrate paleontology) since I was a teen-ager. 

Definitely interesting!

Now tell us. What is the origin of these fossils?

When an animal dies, what happens to its body?
Will it naturally decompose, or does it turn into
a fossil?   

>>> mammal-like reptiles (intermediate in
>>> form between mammals and reptiles),  australopithecines and other
>>> ancient hominids intermediate between apes and humans,  ichthyostegids
>>> intermediate between fish and amphibians, _Basilosaurus_ intermediate
>>> between whales and land animals, dinosaurs intermediate between
>>> reptiles and birds, seymouriamorphs intermediate between amphibians
>>> and reptiles, and_Hyracotherium_ intermediate between horses and early
>>> perissodactyls. 
>>
>>Vince would not write the above unless he believed that it were 
>>fact. When in fact it is not 'fact' but rather only fantasy. Thus he
>>reveals his gullibility.
> 
> You're not going to try to refute even one of the proofs of evolution
> found in the list I provided above? 

Here again Vince reveals to us his gullibility. He claims that what 
he cited above were '"proofs of evolution'",  but they were in fact
only ~~> proofs of his own gullibility!!

> Just sweep them under the rug while ranting about gullibility and
> fantasy?

OK, in your above, you cite as, "proof of evolution" that
dinosaurs were intermediate between reptiles and birds.

You believe in the theropod origin of birds. This has been
exposed as complete foolishness. Yet you are a *believer*. 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"The idea of feathered dinosaurs and the theropod origin of 
birds is being actively promulgated by a cadre of zealous 
scientists acting in concert with certain editors at Nature and 
National Geographic who themselves have become outspoken
and highly biased proselytizers of the faith. 

"Truth and careful scientific weighing of evidence have been 
among the first casualties in their program, which is now fast 
becoming one of the grander scientific hoaxes of our age-the 
paleontological equivalent of cold fusion. But it is certain that 
when the folly has run its course and has been fully exposed,
National Geographic will unfortunately play a prominent but 
unenviable role in the book that summarizes the whole sorry
episode."
             ~ Storrs L. Olson
                Curator of Birds
                National Museum of Natural History
                Smithsonian Institution
                Washington, DC 20560