Re: Man Drops Dead - After Getting Vaxxed

"Attila" wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> "Andrew" wrote:
>>"Samuel Spade"wrote:
>>> "Andrew" wrote:
>>>> "Samuel Spade" wrote:
>>>> > Dawn Flood wrote:
>>>> >> Andrew wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> > And what they did, is in your body, Dawn!
>>>> >>
>>>> >> And, so, if a group of scientists would succeed in synthesizing a
>>>> >> self-replicating molecule from inorganic matter, are you then going to
>>>> >> claim that they were divinely, yet unknowingly, inspired??
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Dawn
>>>> >
>>>> > Andrew would claim that, since the scientists are alive, it's
>>>> > life from existing life and therefore not abiogenesis.  Even
>>>> > though the ingredients are all inorganic.
>>>>
>>>> No, the_only_way they could make life, is by having their
>>>> own children. Through the natural process that was put in
>>>> to place when we were created, by our most awesome, and
>>>> most wonderful Creator----> God.
>>>
>>> I'm afraid you're mistaken.  Life will be abiogenesized in
>>> the lab, probably soon, by the most ~awesome~ creator,
>>> ----> science!
>>
>>Science has already spoken on this. "Law of Biogenesis".
>
> That does not address the origin of life.
>
> AI Overview                 The biogenetic law states that
> ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny-meaning an organism's
> growth (ontogeny) replays the evolutionary history of its
> species (phylogeny). Proposed in 1866 by Ernst Haeckel, it
> suggests embryos pass through the adult stages of ancient
> ancestors.

That was Haeckel's theory, but it has since been totally 
discredited. Therefore in the real world,  there is -no 
such thing- as,"The biogenic law". Haeckel admitted to 
having fraudulently altered his diagrams to support his 
theory. Which has long been *discredited* by 
embryologists..

And unfortunately, because of your 'gullibility', you have
been- ---> DECEIVED <-----.!!!       ^^^^^^^!

_________________________________________


>>> If life were created by an AI program, would you say it was
>>> still created by humans?
>>
>>It would tell us that intelligence was required. Thus proving...
>>
>>                                      ~ ID ~