Bump
Intelligent Party <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.politics.congress,alt.politics.usa.constitution,alt.politics.obama,talk.politics.libertarian,alt.politics.libertarian,alt.activism.d |
|---|---|
| Organization | - |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 6/26/2021 12:59 PM, Intelligent Party wrote: > Re: COVID - It's Your Right To Congregation Is Preeminent, And That Involves > Assembly, Church, The Capitol Demonstration And Public Property > > > It's not like you have freedom of Assembly except as prescribed by law. > > It's not like the Constitution is just saying your right to freedom of speech and > your right to bear arms are just a good idea. > > The Constitution is saying you are right, you are legal, and they are wrong, and > they are illegal, if they prohibit you. > > Yes, you have a right Thanksgiving Dinner too. > > So you fucking monkeys are just going to commit ridiculous acts, and spread COVID, > and not be on your own recognizances, like people recycle and stand in line > without being controlled and coerced to? > > Regulation of commerce - employee and consumer protections, has merit, and is the > way to control. This also includes product labeling/marketing/advertising > control, quality control, and perhaps product bundling. It doesn't include > prohibition when there's not a substitute product. > > So do you think you monkeys would be able to only associate only with intimate, > repetitive, friends and relatives, during COVID, and not throw the gala wedding > party even if it wasn't commercially provided. > > The stupidest thing would be to be in a room with someone you're not going to talk > to, for non-essential activities. > > But isn't all valid work essential!? What are we doing it for otherwise? > > Whenever someone speaks to you, they're spewing tiny specks of spit in your face. > > > Who has to perfect the law? The person with the valid social grievance, or the > person with the valid liberty? > > > > Bump