Bump

On 6/26/2021 12:24 PM, Intelligent Party wrote:
> Selling Contagious Poison, As Food And Recreation, Is My Big Question To America
>
> Consumers are not even warned?
>
> Employees are not even informed the job is to get COVID?
>
> Waiters don't produce equity.  After the service is over there is nothing to show
> for it.
>
> Rather than "Non-Essential Services," "Commercial Entertainment Services" should
> be eliminated.
>
> People TOIL for others entertainment, and amusement?  Work is CREATED this way?
>
> We let people take this big risk for entertainment which doesn't create any equity?
>
> At least people in a movie, create a movie we have for 100 years.
>
> "Commercial Entertainment Services:" I am talking about Broadway, Circuses, Vegas
> Shows, The Opera, Waiters, and Whores.
>
> If there is a substitute product, such as take-out for dine-in, then total
> prohibition may be alright.  We should endeavor to not create an illegal market,
> but whores don't produce anything.  Sex and property are the mountain between us.
> So the lack of a substitute product seems to go to just whores, and I'm not saying
> we should or shouldn't have them, but I don't agree with punishment.
>
> Health Clubs are not even close to the same basket as "Commercial Entertainment
> Services."
>
> Then there's haircuts, pedicures, and gardeners.  The work they provide doesn't
> last for long.
>
> I think I may never hire another waiter in my life.  That's not the sort of job I
> like to provide.  I understand the Restaurant industry is huge.  It is also
> apparently a huge waste.  Do you want to finance more kitchens for quality
> take-out, or more Restaurants?  We can only spend so much, and we don't have
> property at the bottom.  Waiters, rather, should be producing equity, or going to
> school for free.  Waiters could be allowed to spend the same without working, and
> it wouldn't do anything at all to the economy, people would just not 'enjoy' waiters.
>
> The governments would pull poisonous lettuce off the shelves, but there would be
> other lettuce for sale.  They pulled Tryptophan, which killed several people, off
> the shelves for ten years, without a substitute product; do you think that was
> wrong?  COVID is not just poisonous food for sale at Restaurants; COVID is
> contagious poisonous food for sale at restaurants.  The government prohibits
> poisonous drugs to be sold as recreational party-fun.  COVID is not just poison
> sold as recreational party-fun; COVID is contagious poison sold as recreational
> party-fun.
>
> Selling contagious poison, as food and recreation, is my big question to America.
> And taking such a big health risk, for entertainment, which doesn't produce any
> equity.  But actually my question is why have such "Commercial Entertainment
> Services" work, allowed in the first place.  That's what we want to trade?  So the
> waiter can go out to eat, if there ever is a post-COVID?  It's not going to make
> us rich.  Instead he could produce, and buy, a nicer dinning room table. Rather
> than endless toil.
> (And porn-stars, unlike whores, yet like a table producer, and like a movie star,
> produce a product.  Still, the general principle of employment law, is the work
> ought not be unnecessarily dangerous, unnecessarily unsanitary, unnecessarily
> injurious, nor unnecessarily painful.  So, as to professional sports, they only
> sort of produce a product.  I doubt they'll start playing flag football in place
> of NFL, or get rid of boxing anytime soon, but the purpose of Ultimate Fighting
> was supposedly to figure out which martial art works best; and have they figured
> that out?, and do we really need Ultimate Fighting?  They can keep the
> bull-fighting in Mexico, or else we'll have dog fighting and cock fighting and
> other such stuff soon here.  (Animal cruelty, is not a legal persuasion.)  And yet
> these Sports barely produce a product, too; like you watch reruns of the NFL or
> Olympics much.  If you want to play High School for free, or intramural, that's
> another matter.  But the two issues are: employed to commit self-harm; and,
> working for other's amusement producing no equity.)
>
> Making salaries more equitable, could be another way to address the matter.  Based
> on the above, you couldn't ever have a servant for a Birthday party, nor a
> Wedding.  Yet still, do you need one?  But having to pay more equitably, that is
> every person more equal consumption, for an hour worked; could mean not
> frivolously employing a waiter, vs. not paying an NFL star to risk his life. While
> we all need to hold equity and savings, we could all consume the same, but some
> person owns the Empire State Building.
> But even with slave labor, Waiters don't build the economy, and a lot of what is
> going on right now *is* about building the economy.  At least slaves would build
> real equity.  Waiters will not.  So while one way of solving the problem could be
> paying more equal consumption per hour worked, thus we would not frivolously
> employ, nor compel risk taking, for pay, nor high pay, we do need, at the same
> time, to hold capital savings in private hands.
>
> All the above said; working to commit the self harm of risking COVID, and building
> no equity, while doing so, both at the same time, is really the big issue here.
> There's no argument in my mind that it's ludicrous.  Even so, people need jobs,
> but it would be/should be, COVID that put them out of a job, but I guess people
> merely take risks for money, which is serious, when they have no other option.
>
> It's more the fruits of our Capital, that produces, than our labor.  Maybe
> ex-waiters, and the like, should just have free cash to spend, to a degree.  With
> still more incentive than that, to earn, as we need to finance Capital and
> Intellectual Capital - School, to make the Country yet wealthier.... Perhaps money
> if you're trying to get to School, or are going to school.  The Macro-Economy is
> at stake here.
>
> A movie theater can be run by a few people, serving hundreds.  And let's not
> confuse Commercial Entertainment *Services*, with Commercial Entertainment
> *Capital*.  We do want Big Screen T.V.'s right?  For if we went to prohibiting
> Capital, it could be anything... from Children's Toys to Christmas Trees. Anything
> that you enjoy.  Still, jewelry made out of Gold is a colossal waste. People die
> mining Gold all day.  Costume jewelry may be a sufficient substitute product.  (In
> Russia, the waste of the likes of the Faberge Eggs - extremely expensive art -
> contributed the Russian civil war, and over half a century of Marxist Communism,
> which caused the Cold War.)
>
> Selling contagious poison, as food and recreation, while building no equity, is
> yet my big question to America.  The more we study and think about this issue the
> richer we may become.  COVID is a new and fairly unstudied topic.  As the more you
> analyze, the more you know how to allocate, and the richer you become.  What do
> logic, reason, and intelligence ultimately and further dictate?  To know, we have
> to think.  This is a question so far, if it's not clear.
>
>
> "Those who remember always that they know nothing, and who have become willing to
> learn everything, will learn it.
> ...Think not you understand anything until you pass the test of perfect peace" - A
> Course in Miracles
>
> "My fellow Americans, you're owed nothing less than the truth." - President Joe
> Biden, - March 11, 2021
>
>
> How is there non-essential work being done, ever.  While "work from home if you
> can" is a great law, and taking all consumer and employee precautions, and
> protection, is imperative; isn't all work essential?
>
> Rather than "Non-Essential Services," "Commercial Entertainment Services" and
> perhaps "Commercial Entertainment Real Estate," should be eliminated.
>
> If the movie theater were a "public" structure, that could be reserved to show
> your rented movie to hundreds, at least we would be able to use the structure over
> and over, vs. building a movie theater or a football stadium instead of housing.
> Yet the people providing the "non-essential entertainment service" produce no
> equity whatsoever, and after the waiter's work is done, he goes home having
> produced NOTHING.  No dinning room table to last years.  A mere food store in the
> movie theater is notwithstanding.
>
> So "Public" Entertainment Real Estate," is that still bad?  So, do we want
> "Entertainment Real Estate" at all?
>
> 1. Real Property, 2. Personal Property, 3. Consumption.
> Service is a Consumption, unless it produces Personal Property (or Real Property).
>  Consumption is all gone once the work's done.  A gardener's work lasts a couple
> weeks.  I guess you have memories of a waiter's service.
>
> Plus, is it really anyone's passion to be a waiter?  How about a masseuse, or a
> whore, or are those even more important than haircuts as healthcare, but do people
> want to do it, how about to be in a show, on Broadway or in a play?  It's their
> passion?  You think it's not work?  People should wake up happy every day to work.
>  Are these people happy?  Don't we want to eliminate _work_?  Life is about art,
> and science, and friends.
>
> Should _art_ be all hobby?  You can cook for your friends.  Not be enslaved for
> other's entertainment and amusement.
>
>
> "The foundation of empire is art and science.  Remove them or degrade them, and
> the empire is no more.
> Empire follows art and not vice versa as Englishmen suppose." - William Blake
>
> "Sex and art are the same thing." - Pablo Picasso
>
> Left Brain/Right Brain = Science/Art
>
> "The intuitive mind is a sacred gift, and the rational mind is a faithful servant.
>  We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift."
> - Albert Einstein
>
> "Beauty is truth, truth beauty,"—that is all Ye know on earth, and all ye need to
> know." - John Keats
>
> ... if you have industry and science and you're rich!
>
>
> Yet,
> "Love is your power, which... gives you everything."
> - Jesus Christ, A Course in Miracles, Chapter 7, Section 6
>
>
>

Bump