Re: EXCLUSIVE: Student Visa Applicants with 'Hostile Attitudes' Will Be Told They Can't Come to the U.S.
Scott Hoge <[email protected]> Sun, 14 Jun 2026 03:27:37 GMT
| Newsgroups | misc.immigration.usa,alt.activism.student,soc.college.admissions,talk.politics.guns,sac.politics,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh |
|---|---|
| Organization | Eweka Internet Services |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2026-06-12, Larry Parker <[email protected]> wrote: > > State Department employees who review applications from foreign > citizens for student and exchange visas will be told to review > their social media posts and search for signs that they “bear > hostile attitudes toward our citizens, culture, government, > institutions, or founding principles,” according to a document > obtained exclusively by The Free Press. If the United States /really were/ that great a country, foreign citizens who visit us and hold "hostile" attitudes would change their minds. It is only because that stupid, retarded, middle-school-minded, braindead, sloping-foreheaded faggot in the White House can't take constructive criticism that he wets his pants when China comes to have a look at our sorry culture. I do not actually hate intellectually disabled or gay people. Those are just the words I need to slam upon the top of his incorrigible, puerile, intractably closed-minded cranium whenever I hear about his fragile ego and how much he has to hide from the rest of the world about the failures of our society. I watched the Republican primaries in 2015. I would have taken any of those other candidates besides this sickening clown. If the United States can't handle a little intelligent voice advising them on how to be a better country, the deserve their ill, rotten, and unfortunate fate. > [...] > > That move was part of the Trump administration’s ongoing > crackdown [...] Heh-heh... their /"crackdown"/. They must think they're so cool. > support designated foreign terrorists [...] Heh-heh... /"terrorists"/. > and other threats to U.S. national security [...] Heh-heh... /"threats"/. > violence [...] Heh-heh... /"vy-o-lense"/. > Consular officers will have the discretion, however, to > determine whether an applicant’s activism amounts to an actual > threat [...] Which is exactly what's wrong with all these "bad words" I'm laughing at. Our lawmakers don't have the brains to analyze, reflect upon, and define them. Words like "terrorist," "threat," and "violence" are vacuous, empty, silly, question-begging, and yielding of nothing but arbitrary enforcement. > [...] > > Toughened social media reviews “will ensure we are properly > screening every single person attempting to visit our country,” > the official added. It's one-sided surveillance. The scientifically illiterate, stupid-stitious autocrats think they can pry into everyone's Facebook activity while we ourselves aren't even given so much as a proper "search" feature. Ideally, everyone should know everything about everyone. We should surveil the leaders just as freely as they surveil us. A mutual state of surveillance and self-knowledge has the potential to bring everyone out of fear and into harmony. -- Scott Hoge