Re: EXCLUSIVE: Student Visa Applicants with 'Hostile Attitudes' Will Be Told They Can't Come to the U.S.
marika <[email protected]> Sun, 14 Jun 2026 03:37:34 GMT
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,misc.immigration.usa,alt.activism.student,soc.college.admissions,talk.politics.guns,sac.politics |
|---|---|
| Organization | Forte - www.forteinc.com |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Scott Hoge <[email protected]> wrote: A word from our sponsor Breaking Congratulations to the Knicks. Especially Karl Anchovy Towns > On 2026-06-12, Larry Parker <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> State Department employees who review applications from foreign >> citizens for student and exchange visas will be told to review >> their social media posts and search for signs that they “bear >> hostile attitudes toward our citizens, culture, government, >> institutions, or founding principles,” according to a document >> obtained exclusively by The Free Press. > > If the United States /really were/ that great a country, foreign > citizens who visit us and hold "hostile" attitudes would change > their minds. It is only because that stupid, retarded, > middle-school-minded, braindead, sloping-foreheaded faggot in the > White House can't take constructive criticism that he wets his > pants when China comes to have a look at our sorry culture. > > I do not actually hate intellectually disabled or gay people. > Those are just the words I need to slam upon the top of his > incorrigible, puerile, intractably closed-minded cranium whenever > I hear about his fragile ego and how much he has to hide from the > rest of the world about the failures of our society. > > I watched the Republican primaries in 2015. I would have taken > any of those other candidates besides this sickening clown. If > the United States can't handle a little intelligent voice > advising them on how to be a better country, the deserve their > ill, rotten, and unfortunate fate. > >> [...] >> >> That move was part of the Trump administration’s ongoing >> crackdown [...] > > Heh-heh... their /"crackdown"/. They must think they're so cool. > >> support designated foreign terrorists [...] > > Heh-heh... /"terrorists"/. > >> and other threats to U.S. national security [...] > > Heh-heh... /"threats"/. > >> violence [...] > > Heh-heh... /"vy-o-lense"/. > >> Consular officers will have the discretion, however, to >> determine whether an applicant’s activism amounts to an actual >> threat [...] > > Which is exactly what's wrong with all these "bad words" I'm > laughing at. Our lawmakers don't have the brains to analyze, > reflect upon, and define them. Oh yeah, good point! If they did their job, scotus wouldn’t be in a position to mow all their legislation down. >Words like "terrorist," "threat," > and "violence" are vacuous, empty, silly, question-begging, and > yielding of nothing but arbitrary enforcement. > >> [...] >> >> Toughened social media reviews “will ensure we are properly >> screening every single person attempting to visit our country,” >> the official added. > > It's one-sided surveillance. The scientifically illiterate, > stupid-stitious autocrats think they can pry into everyone's > Facebook activity while we ourselves aren't even given so much as > a proper "search" feature. > > Ideally, everyone should know everything about everyone. We > should surveil the leaders just as freely as they surveil us. A > mutual state of surveillance and self-knowledge has the potential > to bring everyone out of fear and into harmony. > > -- Scott Hoge >