Re: EXCLUSIVE: Student Visa Applicants with 'Hostile Attitudes' Will Be Told They Can't Come to the U.S.

marika <[email protected]> Sun, 14 Jun 2026 03:37:34 GMT
Newsgroups alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,misc.immigration.usa,alt.activism.student,soc.college.admissions,talk.politics.guns,sac.politics
Organization Forte - www.forteinc.com
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Scott Hoge <[email protected]> wrote:

A word from our sponsor
Breaking
Congratulations to the Knicks.
Especially Karl Anchovy Towns

> On 2026-06-12, Larry Parker <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> State Department employees who review applications from foreign
>> citizens for student and exchange visas will be told to review
>> their social media posts and search for signs that they “bear
>> hostile attitudes toward our citizens, culture, government,
>> institutions, or founding principles,” according to a document
>> obtained exclusively by The Free Press. 
> 
> If the United States /really were/ that great a country, foreign
> citizens who visit us and hold "hostile" attitudes would change
> their minds. It is only because that stupid, retarded,
> middle-school-minded, braindead, sloping-foreheaded faggot in the
> White House can't take constructive criticism that he wets his
> pants when China comes to have a look at our sorry culture.
> 
> I do not actually hate intellectually disabled or gay people.
> Those are just the words I need to slam upon the top of his
> incorrigible, puerile, intractably closed-minded cranium whenever
> I hear about his fragile ego and how much he has to hide from the
> rest of the world about the failures of our society.
> 
> I watched the Republican primaries in 2015. I would have taken
> any of those other candidates besides this sickening clown. If
> the United States can't handle a little intelligent voice
> advising them on how to be a better country, the deserve their
> ill, rotten, and unfortunate fate.
> 
>> [...]
>> 
>> That move was part of the Trump administration’s ongoing
>> crackdown [...]
> 
> Heh-heh... their /"crackdown"/. They must think they're so cool.
> 
>> support designated foreign terrorists [...]
> 
> Heh-heh... /"terrorists"/.
> 
>> and other threats to U.S. national security [...]
> 
> Heh-heh... /"threats"/.
> 
>> violence [...]
> 
> Heh-heh... /"vy-o-lense"/.
> 
>> Consular officers will have the discretion, however, to
>> determine whether an applicant’s activism amounts to an actual
>> threat [...]
> 
> Which is exactly what's wrong with all these "bad words" I'm
> laughing at. Our lawmakers don't have the brains to analyze,
> reflect upon, and define them. 

Oh yeah, good point! 
If they did their job, scotus wouldn’t be in a position to mow all their
legislation down. 



>Words like "terrorist," "threat,"
> and "violence" are vacuous, empty, silly, question-begging, and
> yielding of nothing but arbitrary enforcement.
> 
>> [...]
>> 
>> Toughened social media reviews “will ensure we are properly
>> screening every single person attempting to visit our country,”
>> the official added. 
> 
> It's one-sided surveillance. The scientifically illiterate,
> stupid-stitious autocrats think they can pry into everyone's
> Facebook activity while we ourselves aren't even given so much as
> a proper "search" feature.
> 
> Ideally, everyone should know everything about everyone. We
> should surveil the leaders just as freely as they surveil us. A
> mutual state of surveillance and self-knowledge has the potential
> to bring everyone out of fear and into harmony.
> 
> -- Scott Hoge
>