Re: HOPE but not faith

Bob Casanova <[email protected]>
Newsgroups alt.atheism,talk.atheism,alt.agnosticism,talk.philosophy.humanism,sci.skeptic,alt.magick
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, 11 Apr 2023 09:49:50 +1000, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Michael McLean
<[email protected]>:

>On 11/04/2023 3:03 am, Bob Casanova wrote:
>> On Mon, 10 Apr 2023 11:22:27 +1000, the following appeared
>> in sci.skeptic, posted by Sylvia Else
>> <[email protected]>:
>> 
>>> On 10-Apr-23 2:02 am, Skeeter wrote:
>>>> In article <[email protected]>,
>>>> [email protected] says...
>>>>>
>>>>> Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>> [email protected] says...
>>>>>>> Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>> [email protected] says...
>>>>>>>>> Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
>>>>>>>>>>> On 08-Apr-23 2:52 pm, Michael McLean wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Everything is the consequence of something.  No thing can create itself.
>>>>>>>>>>>>     It needs a cause.  Thus eternal God or nothing would be here. No thing
>>>>>>>>>>>> can "be" before it is in order to bring itself into "being."
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> So, God can be eternal, but nothing else can, because.....?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Sylvia.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> He created it?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Could God create an eternal universe if he wanted to?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It wouldn't be eternal if it was created.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So you mean no, God isn't powerful enough to create an
>>>>>>> eternal universe.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Twist it around as usual.
>>>>>
>>>>> You said it, not me.
>>>>>
>>>>>>    If it was created it cannot be eternal.
>>>>>
>>>>> Of course it can.  Any omnipotent god can create
>>>>> something that lasts forever.  If he can't, he's not
>>>>> omnipotent and he needs to go back to god school.
>>>>
>>>> If it was created it had a beginning.
>>>
>>> You mean God cannot create an eternal universe that had no beginning?
>>>
>> He's using the first dictionary definition of "eternal",
>> which implies "always existed and always will" and ignoring
>> the second, which does not:
>> 
>>  From the OED:
>> 
>> "1.without beginning or end; lasting forever; always
>> existing (opposed to temporal): eternal life.
>> 
>> 2.perpetual; ceaseless; endless: eternal quarreling;eternal
>> chatter."
>> 
>> IOW, word games.
>
>One thing is for sure, you won't continue to be an eternal wank nowhere man!
>
Correct! And never have been!
>
>How's that?  :-).
>
10 for 10!
>
-- 

Bob C.

"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
 the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
 'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"

- Isaac Asimov
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.