Re: Blasphemy Day

% <[email protected]> Fri, 14 Mar 2025 10:23:19 -0700
Newsgroups alt.atheism,talk.atheism,alt.agnosticism,talk.philosophy.humanism,sci.skeptic
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Xx/v]andrak|≡xX wrote:
> jojo wrote:
>> Xx/v]andrak|≡xX wrote:
>>> % wrote:
>>>> jojo wrote:
>>>>> % wrote:
>>>>>> jojo wrote:
>>>>>>> % wrote:
>>>>>>>> jojo wrote:
>>>>>>>>> % wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> jojo wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Dawn Flood wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/4/2024 11:10 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 10:45:56 +0000, the following appeared in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 08:00:25 +0000, the following appeared in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 02:06:06 +0000, the following 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeared in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 16:59:04 +0000, the following 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeared in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 02 Oct 2024 09:08:20 -0700, the following 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeared
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in sci.skeptic, posted by Don_from_AZ
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shogun <[email protected]> writes:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:16:28 +0000, the following 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeared in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by sora <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> David Dalton wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which from 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wikipedia “educates
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> individuals and groups about blasphemy laws 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and defends freedom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of expression, especially the open criticism 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of religion which is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criminalized in many countries”.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> religion from 2k or 1k or 200 or even 50 years 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ago is no longer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relevant.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Relevant to what?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relevant to helping people navigate life in 2020s 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's relevant if you live anywhere in the Islamic 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> controlled world, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> many other places as well.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yep. The answer to which you replied is hopelessly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parochial; "it's irrelevant to my immediate social 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> circle,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> therefore it's irrelevant for everyone and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everywhere".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> i would regard religious people as fundamentally 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrong, being on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the wrong side of history. being wrong also means it 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> provides no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> benefit to its adherents. they are choosing to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> become obsolete.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There was no need to confirm what I wrote; I already 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> knew I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was correct.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nice. so are you a pious person?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you ask? It wouldn't affect the accuracy of my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comment either way.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> i have no qualms with its accuracy. i am curious and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want to know
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the kind of views believers and non-believers espouse.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hopefully, both "espouse" the same reality, the facts of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which are not subject to belief or disbelief.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that's a nice dream.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Isn't it, though?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have a nice day, and try to expand beyond your parochialism
>>>>>>>>>>>>> WRT the relevance of religion; the world isn't identical to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> your social circle.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey Bob,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Heads up about Jojo -- Mom needs to take his (her?) Internet 
>>>>>>>>>>>> away, and until that happens, discretion is advised.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Dawn
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> dawn, dont be rude!!! also, i have a penis.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> where did you get it , by the train tracks
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> i got it because my cells differentiated because i have a y 
>>>>>>>>> chromosome.. aaa capiche?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> that's no reason
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> that is all the reason and the only reason.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> sorry , you have to post a pic with it beside your face
>>>>>
>>>>> lol i am not posting it here or anywhere! now that i think about 
>>>>> it, i have never taken its pic...
>>>>>
>>>> and make sure to wear your top hat
>>>
>>> And your gay sweater
>>
>> i dont think i will take a photo of my penis.
>>
> 
> I can't remember if I've take a pohoto of m' penis.
> 
> Proof:
> If he can't remember if he tok a photo of his penis then consider if he 
> held a sweet ass puss.  Every day he would judge whether he haf token a 
> photo of his penis and by day 53, the conclusion that he has never taken 
> phjoto of his penis settles in for the seventh or ninth time depending 
> on how studly Ed the Talking Horse was.

as long as he talks about what he is it's good