Re: Blasphemy Day
% <[email protected]> Fri, 14 Mar 2025 10:23:19 -0700
| Newsgroups | alt.atheism,talk.atheism,alt.agnosticism,talk.philosophy.humanism,sci.skeptic |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Xx/v]andrak|≡xX wrote: > jojo wrote: >> Xx/v]andrak|≡xX wrote: >>> % wrote: >>>> jojo wrote: >>>>> % wrote: >>>>>> jojo wrote: >>>>>>> % wrote: >>>>>>>> jojo wrote: >>>>>>>>> % wrote: >>>>>>>>>> jojo wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Dawn Flood wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/4/2024 11:10 AM, Bob Casanova wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 10:45:56 +0000, the following appeared in >>>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 08:00:25 +0000, the following appeared in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 02:06:06 +0000, the following >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeared in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 16:59:04 +0000, the following >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeared in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 02 Oct 2024 09:08:20 -0700, the following >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeared >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in sci.skeptic, posted by Don_from_AZ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shogun <[email protected]> writes: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:16:28 +0000, the following >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeared in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by sora <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> David Dalton wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wikipedia “educates >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> individuals and groups about blasphemy laws >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and defends freedom >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of expression, especially the open criticism >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of religion which is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criminalized in many countries”. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> religion from 2k or 1k or 200 or even 50 years >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ago is no longer >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relevant. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Relevant to what? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relevant to helping people navigate life in 2020s >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and post. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's relevant if you live anywhere in the Islamic >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> controlled world, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> many other places as well. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yep. The answer to which you replied is hopelessly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parochial; "it's irrelevant to my immediate social >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> circle, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> therefore it's irrelevant for everyone and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everywhere". >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> i would regard religious people as fundamentally >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrong, being on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the wrong side of history. being wrong also means it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> provides no >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> benefit to its adherents. they are choosing to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> become obsolete. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There was no need to confirm what I wrote; I already >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> knew I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was correct. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nice. so are you a pious person? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you ask? It wouldn't affect the accuracy of my >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comment either way. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> i have no qualms with its accuracy. i am curious and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want to know >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the kind of views believers and non-believers espouse. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hopefully, both "espouse" the same reality, the facts of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which are not subject to belief or disbelief. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that's a nice dream. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Isn't it, though? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Have a nice day, and try to expand beyond your parochialism >>>>>>>>>>>>> WRT the relevance of religion; the world isn't identical to >>>>>>>>>>>>> your social circle. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hey Bob, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Heads up about Jojo -- Mom needs to take his (her?) Internet >>>>>>>>>>>> away, and until that happens, discretion is advised. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Dawn >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> dawn, dont be rude!!! also, i have a penis. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> where did you get it , by the train tracks >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> i got it because my cells differentiated because i have a y >>>>>>>>> chromosome.. aaa capiche? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> that's no reason >>>>>>> >>>>>>> that is all the reason and the only reason. >>>>>>> >>>>>> sorry , you have to post a pic with it beside your face >>>>> >>>>> lol i am not posting it here or anywhere! now that i think about >>>>> it, i have never taken its pic... >>>>> >>>> and make sure to wear your top hat >>> >>> And your gay sweater >> >> i dont think i will take a photo of my penis. >> > > I can't remember if I've take a pohoto of m' penis. > > Proof: > If he can't remember if he tok a photo of his penis then consider if he > held a sweet ass puss. Every day he would judge whether he haf token a > photo of his penis and by day 53, the conclusion that he has never taken > phjoto of his penis settles in for the seventh or ninth time depending > on how studly Ed the Talking Horse was. as long as he talks about what he is it's good