Re: Blasphemy Day

jojo wrote:
> Xx/v]andrak|≡xX wrote:
>> Dawn Flood wrote:
>>> On 10/4/2024 11:10 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 10:45:56 +0000, the following appeared in
>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
>>>>
>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 08:00:25 +0000, the following appeared in
>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 02:06:06 +0000, the following appeared in
>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 16:59:04 +0000, the following appeared in
>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 02 Oct 2024 09:08:20 -0700, the following appeared
>>>>>>>>>>>> in sci.skeptic, posted by Don_from_AZ
>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> shogun <[email protected]> writes:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:16:28 +0000, the following appeared in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by sora <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> David Dalton wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which from Wikipedia “educates
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> individuals and groups about blasphemy laws and defends 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> freedom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of expression, especially the open criticism of 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> religion which is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criminalized in many countries”.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> religion from 2k or 1k or 200 or even 50 years ago is no 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> longer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relevant.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Relevant to what?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relevant to helping people navigate life in 2020s and post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's relevant if you live anywhere in the Islamic 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> controlled world, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> many other places as well.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Yep. The answer to which you replied is hopelessly
>>>>>>>>>>>> parochial; "it's irrelevant to my immediate social circle,
>>>>>>>>>>>> therefore it's irrelevant for everyone and everywhere".
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> i would regard religious people as fundamentally wrong, being on
>>>>>>>>>>> the wrong side of history. being wrong also means it provides no
>>>>>>>>>>> benefit to its adherents. they are choosing to become obsolete.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There was no need to confirm what I wrote; I already knew I
>>>>>>>>>> was correct.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> nice. so are you a pious person?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Why do you ask? It wouldn't affect the accuracy of my
>>>>>>>> comment either way.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> i have no qualms with its accuracy. i am curious and want to know
>>>>>>> the kind of views believers and non-believers espouse.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hopefully, both "espouse" the same reality, the facts of
>>>>>> which are not subject to belief or disbelief.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> that's a nice dream.
>>>>>
>>>> Isn't it, though?
>>>>
>>>> Have a nice day, and try to expand beyond your parochialism
>>>> WRT the relevance of religion; the world isn't identical to
>>>> your social circle.
>>>>>
>>>
>>> Hey Bob,
>>>
>>> Heads up about Jojo -- Mom needs to take his (her?) Internet away, 
>>> and until that happens, discretion is advised.
>>
>> I don't think a ban is necessary.  He is fixed in his atheism. Utter 
>> sacrilege and blasphemy.   Blasphemy is a victimless crime.
> 
> 
> i dont understand why dawn insists on oppressing me!!
> 
because you're a mouthy little dick face