Re: Blasphemy Day
jojo <[email protected]> Sat, 15 Mar 2025 00:19:18 +0000
| Newsgroups | alt.atheism,talk.atheism,alt.agnosticism,talk.philosophy.humanism,sci.skeptic |
|---|---|
| Organization | jieigyou |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
% wrote: > jojo wrote: >> % wrote: >>> jojo wrote: >>>> % wrote: >>>>> jojo wrote: >>>>>> Xx/v]andrak|≡xX wrote: >>>>>>> Dawn Flood wrote: >>>>>>>> On 10/4/2024 11:10 AM, Bob Casanova wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 10:45:56 +0000, the following >>>>>>>>> appeared in >>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 08:00:25 +0000, the following >>>>>>>>>>> appeared in >>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 02:06:06 +0000, the following >>>>>>>>>>>>> appeared in >>>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 16:59:04 +0000, the following >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeared in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 02 Oct 2024 09:08:20 -0700, the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following appeared >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in sci.skeptic, posted by Don_from_AZ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shogun <[email protected]> writes: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:16:28 +0000, the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following appeared in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by sora <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> David Dalton wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wikipedia “educates >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> individuals and groups about blasphemy laws >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and defends freedom >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of expression, especially the open >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criticism of religion which is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criminalized in many countries”. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> religion from 2k or 1k or 200 or even 50 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> years ago is no longer >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relevant. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Relevant to what? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relevant to helping people navigate life in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2020s and post. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's relevant if you live anywhere in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Islamic controlled world, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> many other places as well. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yep. The answer to which you replied is hopelessly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parochial; "it's irrelevant to my immediate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> social circle, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> therefore it's irrelevant for everyone and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everywhere". >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> i would regard religious people as fundamentally >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrong, being on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the wrong side of history. being wrong also means >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it provides no >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> benefit to its adherents. they are choosing to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> become obsolete. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There was no need to confirm what I wrote; I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already knew I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was correct. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> nice. so are you a pious person? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you ask? It wouldn't affect the accuracy of my >>>>>>>>>>>>> comment either way. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> i have no qualms with its accuracy. i am curious and >>>>>>>>>>>> want to know >>>>>>>>>>>> the kind of views believers and non-believers espouse. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hopefully, both "espouse" the same reality, the facts of >>>>>>>>>>> which are not subject to belief or disbelief. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> that's a nice dream. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Isn't it, though? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Have a nice day, and try to expand beyond your parochialism >>>>>>>>> WRT the relevance of religion; the world isn't identical to >>>>>>>>> your social circle. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hey Bob, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Heads up about Jojo -- Mom needs to take his (her?) >>>>>>>> Internet away, and until that happens, discretion is >>>>>>>> advised. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't think a ban is necessary. He is fixed in his >>>>>>> atheism. Utter sacrilege and blasphemy. Blasphemy is a >>>>>>> victimless crime. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> i dont understand why dawn insists on oppressing me!! >>>>>> >>>>> because you're a mouthy little dick face >>>> >>>> you dont think she is being totally unfair to me? i will go >>>> mad without net. >>>> >>> she doesn't support your theories and it's her right not too , >>> she don't think much of me either but she doesn't , >>> say the things to me she says to you >> >> yeah, she is acting like a dictator with me, throwing me in the >> gulag and telling others to guard the gate. >> > she has that option there's nothing in the faq's about liking > someone wrong is wrong.