Re: Blasphemy Day
% <[email protected]> Fri, 14 Mar 2025 17:26:23 -0700
| Newsgroups | alt.atheism,talk.atheism,alt.agnosticism,talk.philosophy.humanism,sci.skeptic |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
jojo wrote: > % wrote: >> jojo wrote: >>> % wrote: >>>> jojo wrote: >>>>> % wrote: >>>>>> jojo wrote: >>>>>>> Xx/v]andrak|≡xX wrote: >>>>>>>> Dawn Flood wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 10/4/2024 11:10 AM, Bob Casanova wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 10:45:56 +0000, the following appeared in >>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 08:00:25 +0000, the following appeared in >>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 02:06:06 +0000, the following appeared in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 16:59:04 +0000, the following >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeared in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 02 Oct 2024 09:08:20 -0700, the following >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeared >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in sci.skeptic, posted by Don_from_AZ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shogun <[email protected]> writes: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:16:28 +0000, the following >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeared in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by sora <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> David Dalton wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which from Wikipedia >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “educates >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> individuals and groups about blasphemy laws and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> defends freedom >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of expression, especially the open criticism of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> religion which is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criminalized in many countries”. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> religion from 2k or 1k or 200 or even 50 years ago >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is no longer >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relevant. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Relevant to what? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relevant to helping people navigate life in 2020s >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and post. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's relevant if you live anywhere in the Islamic >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> controlled world, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> many other places as well. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yep. The answer to which you replied is hopelessly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parochial; "it's irrelevant to my immediate social >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> circle, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> therefore it's irrelevant for everyone and everywhere". >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> i would regard religious people as fundamentally wrong, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> being on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the wrong side of history. being wrong also means it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> provides no >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> benefit to its adherents. they are choosing to become >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> obsolete. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There was no need to confirm what I wrote; I already knew I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was correct. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nice. so are you a pious person? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you ask? It wouldn't affect the accuracy of my >>>>>>>>>>>>>> comment either way. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> i have no qualms with its accuracy. i am curious and want >>>>>>>>>>>>> to know >>>>>>>>>>>>> the kind of views believers and non-believers espouse. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hopefully, both "espouse" the same reality, the facts of >>>>>>>>>>>> which are not subject to belief or disbelief. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> that's a nice dream. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Isn't it, though? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Have a nice day, and try to expand beyond your parochialism >>>>>>>>>> WRT the relevance of religion; the world isn't identical to >>>>>>>>>> your social circle. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hey Bob, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Heads up about Jojo -- Mom needs to take his (her?) Internet >>>>>>>>> away, and until that happens, discretion is advised. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I don't think a ban is necessary. He is fixed in his atheism. >>>>>>>> Utter sacrilege and blasphemy. Blasphemy is a victimless crime. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> i dont understand why dawn insists on oppressing me!! >>>>>>> >>>>>> because you're a mouthy little dick face >>>>> >>>>> you dont think she is being totally unfair to me? i will go mad >>>>> without net. >>>>> >>>> she doesn't support your theories and it's her right not too , >>>> she don't think much of me either but she doesn't , >>>> say the things to me she says to you >>> >>> yeah, she is acting like a dictator with me, throwing me in the gulag >>> and telling others to guard the gate. >>> >> she has that option there's nothing in the faq's about liking someone > > wrong is wrong. > and we all get a turn at that