Re: NASA's great conspiracy

On 7/7/25 9:01 PM, Andrew W wrote:

> People usually avoid trolls.

No. They're going after the low hanging fruit. They view you
as a soft target, an easy win.

Same in all the groups, and always has been.

take talk.origins for example:  They zero in on young earth
creationists or Intelligent Design advocates like a laser
beam. And why not? They've got DECADES of arguments to reference,
court cases against the I.D. advocates... this isn't just an
easy win, it's a long-ago-already-happened win and they can
pretend to be intelligent or arguably cognizant just by copying
and pasting some old FAQ. But...

But take them outside their comfort zone, challenge them to
think and they'll avoid you like $2 vasectomy.

No, sorry, they view you as "Easy."

"Harmless."

> You twits think this is a courtroom or something.

If only!

I've never had a one that would be satisfied with the "Beyond
a Reasonable Doubt" standard of a court of law.

I mean, just watch the way they wave around their emotional
problems trying to avoid the fact that testimony *Is* evidence!

(I think the problem is that they have no clue what the word
"Evidence" actually means. They seem to mistaken it for an
alternative spelling of "Proof")

> If you had profitable truths would you share it with everyone and lose 
> the profits?

Wisdom is like money:  The more you share the less you have!




-- 
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5