Re: NASA's great conspiracy

JTEM wrote:
> On 7/7/25 9:01 PM, Andrew W wrote:
> 
>> People usually avoid trolls.
> 
> No. They're going after the low hanging fruit. They view you
> as a soft target, an easy win.
> 
> Same in all the groups, and always has been.
> 
> take talk.origins for example:  They zero in on young earth
> creationists or Intelligent Design advocates like a laser
> beam. And why not? They've got DECADES of arguments to reference,
> court cases against the I.D. advocates... this isn't just an
> easy win, it's a long-ago-already-happened win and they can
> pretend to be intelligent or arguably cognizant just by copying
> and pasting some old FAQ. But...
> 
> But take them outside their comfort zone, challenge them to
> think and they'll avoid you like $2 vasectomy.
> 
> No, sorry, they view you as "Easy."
> 
> "Harmless."
> 
>> You twits think this is a courtroom or something.
> 
> If only!
> 
> I've never had a one that would be satisfied with the "Beyond
> a Reasonable Doubt" standard of a court of law.
> 
> I mean, just watch the way they wave around their emotional
> problems trying to avoid the fact that testimony *Is* evidence!
> 
> (I think the problem is that they have no clue what the word
> "Evidence" actually means. They seem to mistaken it for an
> alternative spelling of "Proof")
> 
>> If you had profitable truths would you share it with everyone and lose 
>> the profits?
> 
> Wisdom is like money:  The more you share the less you have!
> 
> 
> 
> 
yea but you're dead