Re: NASA's great conspiracy

% <[email protected]> Mon, 7 Jul 2025 20:58:19 -0700
Newsgroups sci.skeptic,alt.paranormal,alt.atheism,alt.alien.research,alt.ufo.reports
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Andrew W wrote:
> "JTEM"  wrote in message news:[email protected]...
>>
>> On 7/7/25 9:01 PM, Andrew W wrote:
>>
>>> People usually avoid trolls.
>>
>> No. They're going after the low hanging fruit. They view you
>> as a soft target, an easy win.
>>
> 
> Yet they lose.
> 
> 
>>
>> Same in all the groups, and always has been.
>>
>> take talk.origins for example:  They zero in on young earth
>> creationists or Intelligent Design advocates like a laser
>> beam. And why not? They've got DECADES of arguments to reference,
>> court cases against the I.D. advocates... this isn't just an
>> easy win, it's a long-ago-already-happened win and they can
>> pretend to be intelligent or arguably cognizant just by copying
>> and pasting some old FAQ. But...
>>
>> But take them outside their comfort zone, challenge them to
>> think and they'll avoid you like $2 vasectomy.
>>
>> No, sorry, they view you as "Easy."
>>
>> "Harmless."
>>
>>> You twits think this is a courtroom or something.
>>
>> If only!
>>
>> I've never had a one that would be satisfied with the "Beyond
>> a Reasonable Doubt" standard of a court of law.
>>
>> I mean, just watch the way they wave around their emotional
>> problems trying to avoid the fact that testimony *Is* evidence!
>>
>> (I think the problem is that they have no clue what the word
>> "Evidence" actually means. They seem to mistaken it for an
>> alternative spelling of "Proof")
>>
>>> If you had profitable truths would you share it with everyone and 
>>> lose the profits?
>>
>> Wisdom is like money:  The more you share the less you have!
>>
> 
> Nah, when you give, it comes back manyfold. It's a law of the universe.
> 
> 
that's right , a return on your investment