Re: NASA caught LYING TO YOU again!

On 7/29/25 11:30 AM, jojo wrote:

> doesnt look like it.

You know what it looks like?  Mental illness.

#1.  I said that the Dimethyl sulfide in question was already
confirmed. It was detected and later detected again. AND I
said that the claim here wasn't that NASA found no evidence
for it but, no "Strong" evidence. Which means that their
findings were CONSISTENT WITH Dimethyl sulfide, rather than
excluding it.

Any dispute? Any word addressing this at all?

Nope.

#2.  I said that Dimethyl sulfide was not the only biosignature
detected. There were others. I said that Dimethyl sulfide was
so important because there are no non-biological sources.

Any dispute? Was a single word acknowledged or addressed?

Nope.

#3.  I said that NASA, besides NOT claiming that they found no
evidence for it, merely no "Strong" evidence," dismissed this
Dimethyl sulfide as something that could have come from a simple
chemical reaction. But, this is wrong because, as I already
pointed out, as far as we know the only known sources are
biological.

Any dispute? Was this addressed at all? Was it acknowledged?

Nope.

#4.  I said that this was consistent. That, NASA is consistent
in it's denials of evidence for life outside the earth, and
even misinforming the public on the subject. I reiterated facts
raised in a previous thread regarding the Mars lander and the
supposed search for life there.

Any dispute? Was there so much as a single counter example? Any
attempt to address this fact at all?

Nope.



I get that people can  /Like/  a particular answer over others,
but that's not even the problem here. This thread is about me
raising facts that should set off alarm bells in any so called
"Skeptic," while the collective spasms & tries to stop any
conversation it is unable to control.









-- 
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5