Re: EVIDENCE... for what?

On 7/31/25 4:45 PM, jojo wrote:

> some say that fuel such as anti-matter can be used to move at a 
> significant percent of c.
> 
> i am hoping that we can figure out how to move space instead of move 
> through space with new physics.

One massive problem here is that science explains nature, figures
out how it works. Technology is the application of what science
learned about nature.

If and I do mean IF it is possible to move space itself, shouldn't
that be occurring in nature?

I've argued the same about time travel.

if physics allows for time travel, and it does, should we not be
searching for examples of naturally occurring "Time Machines,"
such as worm holes?

Should we not be searching for materials -- even if just rocks
-- that have traveled through time?

Again, science explains nature. Science is just figuring out
how nature works. So in what is effectively an infinitely large
universe, if [blah-blah] conditions will honestly allow for things
like time travel, or the movement of space itself, should we be
able to work out what those conditions would be & search for them?

Or search for their results?





-- 
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5