Re: EVIDENCE... for what?

JTEM wrote:
> On 7/31/25 4:45 PM, jojo wrote:
> 
>> some say that fuel such as anti-matter can be used to move at a 
>> significant percent of c.
>>
>> i am hoping that we can figure out how to move space instead of 
>> move through space with new physics.
> 
> One massive problem here is that science explains nature, figures
> out how it works. Technology is the application of what science
> learned about nature.
> 
> If and I do mean IF it is possible to move space itself, shouldn't
> that be occurring in nature?

dark energy?


> I've argued the same about time travel.
> 
> if physics allows for time travel, and it does, should we not be
> searching for examples of naturally occurring "Time Machines,"
> such as worm holes?
> 
> Should we not be searching for materials -- even if just rocks
> -- that have traveled through time?
> 
> Again, science explains nature. Science is just figuring out
> how nature works. So in what is effectively an infinitely large
> universe, if [blah-blah] conditions will honestly allow for things
> like time travel, or the movement of space itself, should we be
> able to work out what those conditions would be & search for them?
> 
> Or search for their results?
> 

i dont think time travel like moving into the past is possible. 
but space moving does happen via dark energy (whatever that is).

and it has no speed limit of light.