Re: EVIDENCE... for what?

jojo wrote:
> JTEM wrote:
>> On 7/31/25 4:45 PM, jojo wrote:
>>
>>> some say that fuel such as anti-matter can be used to move at a 
>>> significant percent of c.
>>>
>>> i am hoping that we can figure out how to move space instead of move 
>>> through space with new physics.
>>
>> One massive problem here is that science explains nature, figures
>> out how it works. Technology is the application of what science
>> learned about nature.
>>
>> If and I do mean IF it is possible to move space itself, shouldn't
>> that be occurring in nature?
> 
> dark energy?
> 
> 
>> I've argued the same about time travel.
>>
>> if physics allows for time travel, and it does, should we not be
>> searching for examples of naturally occurring "Time Machines,"
>> such as worm holes?
>>
>> Should we not be searching for materials -- even if just rocks
>> -- that have traveled through time?
>>
>> Again, science explains nature. Science is just figuring out
>> how nature works. So in what is effectively an infinitely large
>> universe, if [blah-blah] conditions will honestly allow for things
>> like time travel, or the movement of space itself, should we be
>> able to work out what those conditions would be & search for them?
>>
>> Or search for their results?
>>
> 
> i dont think time travel like moving into the past is possible. but 
> space moving does happen via dark energy (whatever that is).
> 
> and it has no speed limit of light.
> 
i want the dope you take