Re: EVIDENCE... for what?

% wrote:
> jojo wrote:
>> JTEM wrote:
>>> On 7/31/25 4:45 PM, jojo wrote:
>>>
>>>> some say that fuel such as anti-matter can be used to move at 
>>>> a significant percent of c.
>>>>
>>>> i am hoping that we can figure out how to move space instead 
>>>> of move through space with new physics.
>>>
>>> One massive problem here is that science explains nature, figures
>>> out how it works. Technology is the application of what science
>>> learned about nature.
>>>
>>> If and I do mean IF it is possible to move space itself, 
>>> shouldn't
>>> that be occurring in nature?
>>
>> dark energy?
>>
>>
>>> I've argued the same about time travel.
>>>
>>> if physics allows for time travel, and it does, should we not be
>>> searching for examples of naturally occurring "Time Machines,"
>>> such as worm holes?
>>>
>>> Should we not be searching for materials -- even if just rocks
>>> -- that have traveled through time?
>>>
>>> Again, science explains nature. Science is just figuring out
>>> how nature works. So in what is effectively an infinitely large
>>> universe, if [blah-blah] conditions will honestly allow for 
>>> things
>>> like time travel, or the movement of space itself, should we be
>>> able to work out what those conditions would be & search for 
>>> them?
>>>
>>> Or search for their results?
>>>
>>
>> i dont think time travel like moving into the past is possible. 
>> but space moving does happen via dark energy (whatever that is).
>>
>> and it has no speed limit of light.
>>
> i want the dope you take

you know the expansion of the universe is accelerating right? and 
the further away, greater the acceleration?

so there is a concept known as cosmic horizon, point at which 
space is expanding at a speed beyond light, so the light from 
that place will not reach us.