Re: EVIDENCE... for what?

jojo wrote:
> % wrote:
>> jojo wrote:
>>> JTEM wrote:
>>>> On 7/31/25 4:45 PM, jojo wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> some say that fuel such as anti-matter can be used to move at a 
>>>>> significant percent of c.
>>>>>
>>>>> i am hoping that we can figure out how to move space instead of 
>>>>> move through space with new physics.
>>>>
>>>> One massive problem here is that science explains nature, figures
>>>> out how it works. Technology is the application of what science
>>>> learned about nature.
>>>>
>>>> If and I do mean IF it is possible to move space itself, shouldn't
>>>> that be occurring in nature?
>>>
>>> dark energy?
>>>
>>>
>>>> I've argued the same about time travel.
>>>>
>>>> if physics allows for time travel, and it does, should we not be
>>>> searching for examples of naturally occurring "Time Machines,"
>>>> such as worm holes?
>>>>
>>>> Should we not be searching for materials -- even if just rocks
>>>> -- that have traveled through time?
>>>>
>>>> Again, science explains nature. Science is just figuring out
>>>> how nature works. So in what is effectively an infinitely large
>>>> universe, if [blah-blah] conditions will honestly allow for things
>>>> like time travel, or the movement of space itself, should we be
>>>> able to work out what those conditions would be & search for them?
>>>>
>>>> Or search for their results?
>>>>
>>>
>>> i dont think time travel like moving into the past is possible. but 
>>> space moving does happen via dark energy (whatever that is).
>>>
>>> and it has no speed limit of light.
>>>
>> i want the dope you take
> 
> you know the expansion of the universe is accelerating right? and the 
> further away, greater the acceleration?
> 
> so there is a concept known as cosmic horizon, point at which space is 
> expanding at a speed beyond light, so the light from that place will not 
> reach us.
> 
i don't care i wuit playing rocket ships a long time ago