Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get

Now this will be completely lost on the D.I.D. system but,
the point here isn't whether or not anyone agrees with an
idea, it was to discuss the idea itself.

https://www.facebook.com/reel/1105024124554227

It's a discussion on how things might work, if the idea
is correct, and NOT a discussion on whether or not the
idea is correct.

      ...neil degrasse tyson actually has to pull that
guy AWAY from the "True/Not true" argument, lead him
back to the topic...

See, it's very easy to reject an idea. But if you haven't
fully aired the idea, explored how it would work, it's
implications, what are you dismissing?

I'll tell you what you're dismissing:  Anything that
challenges the status quo.

In your case there's another level... we'll call it
"Insanity," for lack of a better word, where you don't
seem to be able to recall much less apply knowledge
from one sentence to the next. But I'm not going to
mention this fact. Not I. Well. Yes I am. In fact, I
just did.

You seem to be aware that time and even space does not
appear to exist for the photon, that it is effectively
everywhere it can potentially be, and you even seem to
grasp that the same is not true for humans. But then
you turn around and dismiss the fact that BECAUSE our
rules are so dramatically different from that of the
photon, we perceive not at all subtle differences in
time.

Yes, believe it or not, because our concept of time
does not exist for a photon, things don't happen the
same way for us and the photon...

Nope. You can't grasp this. You can't apply what you
know elsewhere to this more narrow example.

It's gone.

And you also can't grasp that if tachyons exist then
we can send messages backwards through time. Instead
you just dogmatically ignore evidence and pretend
that it's all settled, tachyons don't exist.

Well it's not settled. And if they exist we can send
messages backwards through time.







-- 
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5