Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get

On 11/10/2025 12:11 PM, JTEM wrote:
> 
> Now this will be completely lost on the D.I.D. system but,
> the point here isn't whether or not anyone agrees with an
> idea, it was to discuss the idea itself.
> 
> https://www.facebook.com/reel/1105024124554227
> 
> It's a discussion on how things might work, if the idea
> is correct, and NOT a discussion on whether or not the
> idea is correct.
> 
>       ...neil degrasse tyson actually has to pull that
> guy AWAY from the "True/Not true" argument, lead him
> back to the topic...
> 
> See, it's very easy to reject an idea. But if you haven't
> fully aired the idea, explored how it would work, it's
> implications, what are you dismissing?
> 
> I'll tell you what you're dismissing:  Anything that
> challenges the status quo.
> 
> In your case there's another level... we'll call it
> "Insanity," for lack of a better word, where you don't
> seem to be able to recall much less apply knowledge
> from one sentence to the next. But I'm not going to
> mention this fact. Not I. Well. Yes I am. In fact, I
> just did.
> 
> You seem to be aware that time and even space does not
> appear to exist for the photon, that it is effectively
> everywhere it can potentially be, and you even seem to
> grasp that the same is not true for humans. But then
> you turn around and dismiss the fact that BECAUSE our
> rules are so dramatically different from that of the
> photon, we perceive not at all subtle differences in
> time.
> 
> Yes, believe it or not, because our concept of time
> does not exist for a photon, things don't happen the
> same way for us and the photon...
> 
> Nope. You can't grasp this. You can't apply what you
> know elsewhere to this more narrow example.
> 
> It's gone.
> 
> And you also can't grasp that if tachyons exist then
> we can send messages backwards through time. Instead
> you just dogmatically ignore evidence and pretend
> that it's all settled, tachyons don't exist.
> 
> Well it's not settled. And if they exist we can send
> messages backwards through time.
> 

Please stop trying to have multiple conversations with me, okay?!

As I have already told you, tachyons are not part of the Standard Model. 
  Why?  Because, they don't exist (the simplest explanation), and even 
if they are someday discovered, as with isolating quarks (which do 
exist), it may be physically impossible to manipulate them.

Simple, right?  And, now, please stop posting your same crap over & over!!

Dawn