The Valid and the Invalid
Ilya Shambat <[email protected]> Fri, 20 Oct 2023 03:15:43 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | alt.angst |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
There are many situations in which people mistake the value for the abuses = of the value. This leads them to throw away what is valid along with what i= s invalid. Valid: Confronting abuse against unattractive people. Invalid: militating a= gainst family, beauty and love. Valid: Wanting business to treat workers better. Invalid: advocating for sl= aughters of propertied class. Valid: Seeking more responsible treatment of the environment. Invalid: atta= cking scientific and technological progress. Valid: loving your ethnic group. Invalid: hating other ethnic groups. What we see in such situations, once again, is confusion between the value = and the misuses of the value. That stupid teenagers and unethical plastic s= urgeons do wrong things for beauty does not damn beauty; it damns them. Tha= t some in business are ugly to their workers does not damn the propertied; = it damns them. That some people see environmental protection as incompatibl= e with the goals of capitalism does not damn capitalism; it damns them. Tha= t some people think that patriotism means hating other countries does not d= amn patriotism; it damns them. When confronted with abuses of a value, the correct solution is therefore d= istinguishing the valid from the invalid. Stupid teenagers and unethical pl= astic surgeons don=E2=80=99t own beauty; it has existed for many centuries = before them and will continue existing long after they are gone. People who= use money for wrong things do not own money; there are all sorts of prospe= rous people, and many of them are good people. People who blindly plunder n= ature do not own science and technology; the best technologies are congruen= t with nature and realize both economic benefit and environmental sanity. A= nd people who support such things as white supremacism make total asses of = their ethnic groups and lead to the ethnic group being hated. So we have seen people look at the wrong done in families and becoming anti= -family. That is wrong. The problem is not the value but the misuses of the= value. People doing wrong things in families discredits family as such, wh= ich is a completely destructive direction. Family should not be equated wit= h its abuses. Family can, and should, be done better. There are any number of applications to this. And when we see a value being= tarnished by its abuses, the correct solution, once again, the valid from = the invalid. Then these kinds of problems actually have a chance to be solv= ed in a wise and principled way. This, then, becomes the solution to the situation.