Re: "Getting to experience life" is not a benefit for livestock
Willie Denson <678.714.5764@georgia_bell.com>
| Newsgroups | alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,talk.politics.guns,alt.finance,talk.politics.misc |
|---|---|
| Organization | Grinding down knuckle-dragging right-wingnut fuckwits |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 10/24/2021 10:49 AM, poster wrote: > "678.714.5764" <[email protected]> wrote in message > news:[email protected]... >> Discuss. > > If livestock doesn't get to experience life, then no, there wouldn't be any > benefit to it. It does get to experience life, and therein lies the benefit > to it. > > "Getting to experience life" in the first place, which is Fuckwit's tortured expression for coming into existence, is not a benefit in any way. An entity must already exist in order to realize any benefit. A benefit is an improvement in the welfare of an entity. Coming into existence does not improve the welfare of any entity — it establishes the entity and its welfare, but it does not improve it. "Getting to experience life," i.e. coming into existence, is not a benefit for livestock or any other welfare-bearing entity.