Re: Existence - not "better" than never existing
George Plimpton <[email protected]> Thu, 22 Aug 2024 18:15:38 -0700
| Newsgroups | alt.philosophy,alt.atheism,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian |
|---|---|
| Organization | Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price! www.newshosting.com |
| Message-ID | <%oRxO.660032$qO%[email protected]> |
On 2/3/2011 9:55 AM, David "Fuckwit" Harrison, stupid knuckle-dragging
illiterate cracker *convicted* for engaging in dog-fighting, lied:
>
> Elimination would NOT provide decent lives,
*You* don't care about providing "decent lives".
> There's a HUGE difference between
> wanting billions of future livestock to enjoy lives of positive
> value, and wanting there to be no livestock animals to enjoy
> anything.
Not to you, there isn't:
I would eat animals even if I thought that it was cruel
to them, and even if they gained nothing from the deal.
David Harrison 23 Sep 1999 http://tinyurl.com/yh5yc6w
I am not an extremist about it, and if I thought that all
of the animals I eat had terrible lives, I would still eat
meat. That is not because I don't care about them at all,
but I would just ignore their suffering.
David Harrison Nov 29 1999 http://tinyurl.com/k66pb
I don't try to eat ethically, because I don't really care
enough to make the effort.
David Harrison 31 July 2003 http://tinyurl.com/2v5ayqy
You "don't really care enough to make the effort" - the *fraudulence* of your
blabber about "consideration" for "decent lives of possitive [sic] value" could
not be more blatant.
You're a fraud - a blatant liar and a fraud.