Re: Existence - not "better" than never existing

George Plimpton <[email protected]> Thu, 22 Aug 2024 18:15:38 -0700
Newsgroups alt.philosophy,alt.atheism,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
Organization Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price! www.newshosting.com
Message-ID <%oRxO.660032$qO%[email protected]>
On 2/3/2011 9:55 AM, David "Fuckwit" Harrison, stupid knuckle-dragging 
illiterate cracker *convicted* for engaging in dog-fighting, lied:

>
>      Elimination would NOT provide decent lives,

*You* don't care about providing "decent lives".


> There's a HUGE difference between
> wanting billions of future livestock to enjoy lives of positive
> value, and wanting there to be no livestock animals to enjoy
> anything.

Not to you, there isn't:

      I would eat animals even if I thought that it was cruel
      to them, and even if they gained nothing from the deal.

      David Harrison 23 Sep 1999  http://tinyurl.com/yh5yc6w


      I am not an extremist about it, and if I thought that all
      of the animals I eat had terrible lives, I would still eat
      meat. That is not because I don't care about them at all,
      but I would just ignore their suffering.

      David Harrison Nov 29 1999  http://tinyurl.com/k66pb


      I don't try to eat ethically, because I don't really care
      enough to make the effort.

      David Harrison 31 July 2003  http://tinyurl.com/2v5ayqy


You "don't really care enough to make the effort" - the *fraudulence* of your 
blabber about "consideration" for "decent lives of possitive [sic] value" could 
not be more blatant.

You're a fraud - a blatant liar and a fraud.