Re: Existence - not "better" than never existing

On Thu, 22 Aug 2024 18:15:38 -0700, George Plimpton wrote:

> On 2/3/2011 9:55 AM, David "Fuckwit" Harrison, stupid knuckle-dragging 
> illiterate cracker *convicted* for engaging in dog-fighting, lied:
> 
>>
>>      Elimination would NOT provide decent lives,
> 
> *You* don't care about providing "decent lives".
> 
> 
>> There's a HUGE difference between
>> wanting billions of future livestock to enjoy lives of positive
>> value, and wanting there to be no livestock animals to enjoy
>> anything.
> 
> Not to you, there isn't:
> 
>       I would eat animals even if I thought that it was cruel
>       to them, and even if they gained nothing from the deal.
> 
>       David Harrison 23 Sep 1999  http://tinyurl.com/yh5yc6w
> 
> 
>       I am not an extremist about it, and if I thought that all
>       of the animals I eat had terrible lives, I would still eat
>       meat. That is not because I don't care about them at all,
>       but I would just ignore their suffering.
> 
>       David Harrison Nov 29 1999  http://tinyurl.com/k66pb
> 
> 
>       I don't try to eat ethically, because I don't really care
>       enough to make the effort.
> 
>       David Harrison 31 July 2003  http://tinyurl.com/2v5ayqy
> 
> 
> You "don't really care enough to make the effort" - the *fraudulence* of your 
> blabber about "consideration" for "decent lives of possitive [sic] value" could 
> not be more blatant.
> 
> You're a fraud - a blatant liar and a fraud.



fellows, there is a solution to all this, lab grown meat. you get
actual meat, without the need to husband animals.