Re: Existence - not "better" than never existing
Derek <[email protected]> Fri, 23 Aug 2024 16:38:22 +0100
| Newsgroups | alt.philosophy,alt.atheism,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 22 Aug 2024 18:15:38 -0700, George Plimpton <[email protected]> wrote: >On 2/3/2011 9:55 AM, David "Fuckwit" Harrison, stupid knuckle-dragging >illiterate cracker *convicted* for engaging in dog-fighting, lied: > >> >> Elimination would NOT provide decent lives, > >*You* don't care about providing "decent lives". > > >> There's a HUGE difference between >> wanting billions of future livestock to enjoy lives of positive >> value, and wanting there to be no livestock animals to enjoy >> anything. > >Not to you, there isn't: > > I would eat animals even if I thought that it was cruel > to them, and even if they gained nothing from the deal. > > David Harrison 23 Sep 1999 http://tinyurl.com/yh5yc6w > > > I am not an extremist about it, and if I thought that all > of the animals I eat had terrible lives, I would still eat > meat. That is not because I don't care about them at all, > but I would just ignore their suffering. > > David Harrison Nov 29 1999 http://tinyurl.com/k66pb > > > I don't try to eat ethically, because I don't really care > enough to make the effort. > > David Harrison 31 July 2003 http://tinyurl.com/2v5ayqy > > >You "don't really care enough to make the effort" - the *fraudulence* of your >blabber about "consideration" for "decent lives of possitive [sic] value" could >not be more blatant. > >You're a fraud - a blatant liar and a fraud. I'm a vegan, and my favourite animal is a high horse.