Re: Existence - not "better" than never existing
Ron Hamilton <[email protected]> Mon, 14 Apr 2025 09:31:04 -0700
| Newsgroups | alt.philosophy,alt.atheism,sci.skeptic,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,sci.environment |
|---|---|
| Organization | Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price! www.newshosting.com |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 1/21/2011 10:18 AM, T. Howard Pines, Jr. wrote: > Coming into existence, or "getting to experience life", is not better than never > existing. It can't be, because no such comparison can be made. Nor can > existence be worse than never existing, for the same reason. Correct. > > In order to say that anything is better or worse for an entity, one necessarily > is talking about two different states of welfare or well-being for the entity. > But an entity must exist in order to have a welfare state of well-being. Thus, > the comparison between existence and non-existence, from the perspective of the > entity, cannot be made. It is absurd. Also correct.