Re: ‘We Risk a Constitutional Crisis’ i f Ginsburg Successor Not Confirmed Before Election
BeamMeUpScotty <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.atheism,alt.politics,alt.politics.trump,talk.politics,alt.conspiracy,alt.save.the.earth,alt.global-warming,alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,alt.censorship,alt.apocalypse,talk.politics.guns,misc.survivalism |
|---|---|
| Organization | Forte - www.forteinc.com |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 9/19/20 12:08 PM, Manchurian Candidate Joe wrote: > Cruz: ‘We Risk a Constitutional Crisis’ if Ginsburg Successor Not Confirmed Before Election > > > On Friday’s broadcast of the Fox News Channel’s “Hannity,” Senate Judiciary Committee member Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) stated that President Donald Trump should nominate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s successor next week, and that the Senate should confirm a successor before the election. Cruz argued that Democrats plan to challenge the 2020 election, and having a 4-4 court would “risk a constitutional crisis” given that likelihood. > > Cruz said, “I believe that the president should, next week, nominate a successor to the court. And I think it is critical that the Senate takes up and confirms that successor before Election Day. There’s going to be enormous pressure from the media. There’s going to be enormous pressure from Democrats to delay filling this vacancy. But this election — this nomination is why Donald Trump was elected. This confirmation is why the voters voted for a Republican majority in the Senate. And I’ll tell you one reason in particular, Sean, why I think it is tremendously important that not only does the nomination happen next week, but that the confirmation happen before Election Day: Because Democrats and Joe Biden have made clear, they intend to challenge this election, they intend to fight the legitimacy of the election. … And we cannot have Election Day come and go with a 4-4 court. A 4-4 court that is equally divided cannot decide anything, and I think we risk a constitutional crisis if we do not have a nine-justice Supreme Court, particularly when there is such a risk of a contested litigation — and a contested election.” > You see, I wasn't the only one who saw the Democrats "never let a crisis go to waste" credo as the way to make them see that this is imperative that TRUMP do this and the Senate do it FASTER THAN EVER BEFORE.... We have a Conga Line of crisis and many will be decided in the Supreme Court, and we need a fully functioning court for this to be a fair process that decides the NATION'S FUTURE. We know Democrats are spawning these crisis as fast as they can to fill TRUMPS Presidency with volatility. And they want to confuse and create chaos so they can steal the NATION from WE THE PEOPLE. I don't often agree with Ted Cruz but on this one I do agree that for the NATION and FOR THE CHILDREN we have to get TRUMP to appoint a new Supreme Court member to replace Gisnberg who was apparently manipulated by the Democrats to stay in office until she died rather than retiring and allowing for a normal peaceful transition. Isn't it odd that for decades the Supreme Court has been mostly uneventful until Marxist-Democrats are pushing to undermine the NATION in every way they can try to use the Supreme Court to take over the NATION and use those 9 seats of power to steal America from WE THE PEOPLE. -- That's Karma https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=36&v=UXA--dj2-CY&feature=emb_logo Biden is guilty!!!!