Re: Confederate Statues Were Built To Further A 'White Supremacist Future'

BeamMeUpScotty <[email protected]>
Newsgroups alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.culture.usa,alt.politics.economics,alt.atheism,alt.politics,alt.conspiracy,alt.politics.libertarian,alt.save.the.earth,alt.global-warming,alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,alt.censorship,alt.apocalypse,talk.politics.guns,misc.survivalism,alt.survival,alt.politics, alt.politics.republicans,alt.politics.trump,alt.society.liberalism,talk.politics.misc
Organization idiocracy.gov
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 7/28/20 12:46 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
> August 20, 20178:31 AM ET
> Miles Parks
> 
> As President Trump doubled down on his defense of Confederate statues
> and monuments this week, he overlooked an important fact noted by
> historians: The majority of the memorials seem to have been built with
> the intention not to honor fallen soldiers, but specifically to further
> ideals of white supremacy.
> 
> More than 30 cities either have removed or are removing Confederate
> monuments, according to a list compiled by The New York Times, and the
> president said Thursday that in the process, the history and culture of
> the country was being "ripped apart."
> 
> Groups like the Sons of Confederate Veterans defend the monuments,
> arguing they are an important part of history. One of the leaders of
> that group, Carl V. Jones, wrote a letter on Aug. 14 condemning the
> violence and "bigotry" displayed in Charlottesville, but he also
> denounced "the hatred being leveled against our glorious ancestors by
> radical leftists who seek to erase our history."
> [...]
> "Most of the people who were involved in erecting the monuments were not
> necessarily erecting a monument to the past," said Jane Dailey, an
> associate professor of history at the University of Chicago."But were
> rather, erecting them toward a white supremacist future."
> 
> https://www.npr.org/2017/08/20/544266880/confederate-statues-were-built-to-further-a-white-supremacist-future
> 
> 
> The "history" of these white supremacists' ancestors is a history of
> *treason*.
> 
> The memorials are coming down.  The descendants of traitors and their
> allies are just going to have to come to grips with that.

You seem to be saying that the Confederated were white supremacists...
but the Confederates were DEMOCRATS who wanted a new government and who
burned and looted to get one....  How have the Democrats changed in 150
years, the Democrats look like the same people.

The Democrats burnes and looted and made people get on their knees
before and during the CIVIL WAR, and today they do it again and tell us
they know what the right choices are.... but the *Democrats* enacted the
Jim Crow Laws and that was long after the Confederated who were the
DEMOCRATS LOST THE CIVIL WAR.

The Democrats started a civil war over White Supremacy and lost and then
created laws to enact White supremacy in the form of Jim Crow laws and
now these SAME Democrat genius' want to tell us how to become more
accepting of racial equality?

Is this like asking the modern NAZI Party how we should correct the
issues of the Jews being sent to concentration camps?

The Democrats are the problem. And yet the Democrats presume to lecture
the rest of us? Who the fuck cares what Democrats think other than the
other White Supremacist Democrats.

Destroying the Statues will help keep their lie alive so they can
continue their white Supremacy in the duplicitous manner that they have
adopted.  The Marxist #BLM is the ultimate Coup D'etat of Democrats
getting the "leaders of the blacks" to actually support their own
enslavement.

Marxism is the Definition of FRACTIONAL SLAVERY. and the Marxist
Communist Credo of From those with,  to those without... is FRACTIONAL
SLAVERY.  The confiscation of the product of labor from the one person,
and given to another who didn't engage in the labor.... and doing that
on a mass scale divided into groups of people whose labor is confiscated
as a group and given to another group, which results in fractional
ownership of the slaves. This is who Modern Democrats are.  They still
support slavery, after all the failures they have had trying to force
slavery on America.


But why keep trying to promote a failed idea like slavery, if not to
simply be trying to destroy America which offers the spark of freedom to
all of humanity, which is a dangerous idea to those who would rather own
you than meet you as an equal.  Who runs the Democrat party... the
people who would rather own you?



-- 
*That's Karma*

*Democrats aren't the PARTY of diversity they're the party of division*
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.