Re: Confederate Statues Were Built To Further A 'White Supremacist Future'
BeamMeUpScotty <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.culture.usa,alt.politics.economics,alt.atheism,alt.politics,alt.conspiracy,alt.politics.libertarian,alt.save.the.earth,alt.global-warming,alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,alt.censorship,alt.apocalypse,talk.politics.guns,misc.survivalism,alt.survival,alt.politics, alt.politics.republicans,alt.politics.trump,alt.society.liberalism,talk.politics.misc |
|---|---|
| Organization | idiocracy.gov |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 7/28/20 12:46 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote: > August 20, 20178:31 AM ET > Miles Parks > > As President Trump doubled down on his defense of Confederate statues > and monuments this week, he overlooked an important fact noted by > historians: The majority of the memorials seem to have been built with > the intention not to honor fallen soldiers, but specifically to further > ideals of white supremacy. > > More than 30 cities either have removed or are removing Confederate > monuments, according to a list compiled by The New York Times, and the > president said Thursday that in the process, the history and culture of > the country was being "ripped apart." > > Groups like the Sons of Confederate Veterans defend the monuments, > arguing they are an important part of history. One of the leaders of > that group, Carl V. Jones, wrote a letter on Aug. 14 condemning the > violence and "bigotry" displayed in Charlottesville, but he also > denounced "the hatred being leveled against our glorious ancestors by > radical leftists who seek to erase our history." > [...] > "Most of the people who were involved in erecting the monuments were not > necessarily erecting a monument to the past," said Jane Dailey, an > associate professor of history at the University of Chicago."But were > rather, erecting them toward a white supremacist future." > > https://www.npr.org/2017/08/20/544266880/confederate-statues-were-built-to-further-a-white-supremacist-future > > > The "history" of these white supremacists' ancestors is a history of > *treason*. > > The memorials are coming down. The descendants of traitors and their > allies are just going to have to come to grips with that. You seem to be saying that the Confederated were white supremacists... but the Confederates were DEMOCRATS who wanted a new government and who burned and looted to get one.... How have the Democrats changed in 150 years, the Democrats look like the same people. The Democrats burnes and looted and made people get on their knees before and during the CIVIL WAR, and today they do it again and tell us they know what the right choices are.... but the *Democrats* enacted the Jim Crow Laws and that was long after the Confederated who were the DEMOCRATS LOST THE CIVIL WAR. The Democrats started a civil war over White Supremacy and lost and then created laws to enact White supremacy in the form of Jim Crow laws and now these SAME Democrat genius' want to tell us how to become more accepting of racial equality? Is this like asking the modern NAZI Party how we should correct the issues of the Jews being sent to concentration camps? The Democrats are the problem. And yet the Democrats presume to lecture the rest of us? Who the fuck cares what Democrats think other than the other White Supremacist Democrats. Destroying the Statues will help keep their lie alive so they can continue their white Supremacy in the duplicitous manner that they have adopted. The Marxist #BLM is the ultimate Coup D'etat of Democrats getting the "leaders of the blacks" to actually support their own enslavement. Marxism is the Definition of FRACTIONAL SLAVERY. and the Marxist Communist Credo of From those with, to those without... is FRACTIONAL SLAVERY. The confiscation of the product of labor from the one person, and given to another who didn't engage in the labor.... and doing that on a mass scale divided into groups of people whose labor is confiscated as a group and given to another group, which results in fractional ownership of the slaves. This is who Modern Democrats are. They still support slavery, after all the failures they have had trying to force slavery on America. But why keep trying to promote a failed idea like slavery, if not to simply be trying to destroy America which offers the spark of freedom to all of humanity, which is a dangerous idea to those who would rather own you than meet you as an equal. Who runs the Democrat party... the people who would rather own you? -- *That's Karma* *Democrats aren't the PARTY of diversity they're the party of division*