Re: More guns, more shootings
BeamMeUpScotty <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.culture.usa,alt.politics.economics,alt.atheism,alt.politics,alt.conspiracy,alt.politics.libertarian,alt.save.the.earth,alt.global-warming,alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,alt.censorship,alt.apocalypse,talk.politics.guns,misc.survivalism,alt.politics.usa.republican, alt.politics.democrats.d,alt.politics.trump,or.politics |
|---|---|
| Organization | idiocracy.gov |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 7/28/20 2:32 AM, Gronk wrote: > > https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/07418825.2020.1789693?journalCode=rjqy20& > > > Comparing the Impact of Household Gun Ownership and Concealed Carry > Legislation on the Frequency of Mass Shootings and Firearms Homicide > > Abstract > Although mass shootings have fueled calls for large-scale changes in gun > ownership and concealed carry legislation over the past thirty years, > few studies have evaluated whether permissive gun policies actually > deter mass shootings, and none have determined if their effects are the > same on firearms homicide in general. This study examines the impact of > household gun ownership and concealed carry legislation on annual counts > of mass shootings and firearms homicides in the United States from 1991 > to 2016. Negative binomial regressions with fixed effects and > generalized estimating equations (GEE) indicate that /*mass shootings > disproportionately occur in states with higher levels of gun ownership, > while firearms homicide rates are higher in permissive concealed carry > states*/. As the two crimes do not respond to changes in gun ownership > and concealed carry legislation in the same way, lawmakers must > contextualize mass shootings as a small, unique part of overall gun > violence when considering policy interventions. Have I mentioned that *the DEMOCRATS* RELEASED THE CRIMINALS FROM THE PRISONS and JAILS? What could possibly go wrong with that Democrat plan. -- *That's Karma* *Democrats aren't the PARTY of diversity they're the party of division*