Re: Will Ginsburg ever die

On 7/30/20 4:24 PM, Kevrob wrote:
> On Thursday, July 30, 2020 at 11:29:35 AM UTC-4, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
>> On 7/29/20 11:46 PM, David Hartung wrote:
>>> On 7/29/20 8:17 PM, Democrats Hate America wrote:
>>>> Ruth Bader Ginsburg Undergoes “Non-Surgical Procedure” to Replace Bile
>>>> Duct Stent – During Her Chemotherapy
>>>
>>> Ruth Bader Ginsberg will die when it is her time, and not before. For
>>> anyone to wish otherwise is simply wrong.
>>>
>> Ginsberg believes it's OK to wish for a human life.....
> 
> I used to listen to Rush, but haven't done so for, perhaps,
> 15 years.  I would not have oted to put RBG on the Court.
> 
> Rush has cancer, and it may kill him.  I don't wish for his
> death.  I would hope he would go into remission, and a quiet
> retirement.  I expect he'd rather "die behind the mic."
> 
> The OP posted to this one group.  The "Beam Me Up..." troll
> cross-posted his vileness into many groups, where his spew
> isn't wanted.  Would anyone who responds to him, in future, 
> please trim groups to only the relevant ones?
> 
> Thank you.
> 
Imagine that the Supreme court is irrelevant to free speech...  and the
group that he says isn't interested in human life or the Supreme court,
I can't imagine any group being immune from what the supreme court and
human life are linked with.  From the time you are conceived you're
linked with human life, to the time the Supreme court allows the death
penalty to end that life, and all the years in between...  and the tooth
paste you buy and the way you use water and apparently the carbon that
is in a cycle similar to the water cycle, all of it right down to your DNA.

The way I hear it the Supreme Court decides just about everything you do
sooner or later... so an incompetent justice with RADICAL ideas sounds
like they're intertwined with every group that received the post.

If those people can explain how the Supreme court has no power over
their very group and it's speech and all the things they discuss then I
can certainly delete that group from my actively used news groups.

Also I do not troll, I post 1% and I reply 99% of the time, sometimes to
the single group and sometimes to more.  Trying to shut me up because
you disagree with what I say by pretending it's where I said it is
typical of LYING duplicitous LEFTIST.


Do I need to be in a Church to pray? Do I need to be in a court room to
tell the truth?  NO, it's ridiculous to pretend there are zones where
free speech is actually free.  If the group expected to be private and
keep people out it wouldn't be on a public forum that I can post to.

Do I have to be black to post to a forum with black issues or female to
post to a woman's forum?  Do I agree with Democrats to post in a
Democrat forum? What do Democrats talk about if NOT the Supreme Court?
DO the Democrats only tell each other lies to make sure they all agree?
SO if I want to post there I have to tell the same Democrat lies?

I have no idea if I actually sent this to the groups it was already
coming from or I added new groups to the list and it isn't worth the
effort to look for it, but they seem to have responded only to the
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh which was where I read the original.  Was it a
lucky guess on their part or are they trying to target me with
complaints to try to intimidate me from using the FREE SPEECH that the
SUPREME COURT says I have? I only ask this because the Marxist-Democrats
have an ongoing campaign all over the BIG TECH companies platforms on
the internet to silence people who speak out against their Democrat
policies and stupidity.



-- 
*That's Karma*

*Democrats aren't the PARTY of diversity they're the party of division*