Re: Will Ginsburg ever die

On Thu, 30 Jul 2020 11:29:26 -0400, BeamMeUpScotty
<[email protected]> wrote:

>On 7/29/20 11:46 PM, David Hartung wrote:
>> On 7/29/20 8:17 PM, Democrats Hate America wrote:
>>> Ruth Bader Ginsburg Undergoes “Non-Surgical Procedure” to Replace Bile
>>> Duct Stent – During Her Chemotherapy
>> 
>> Ruth Bader Ginsberg will die when it is her time, and not before. For
>> anyone to wish otherwise is simply wrong.
>> 
>Ginsberg believes it's OK to wish for a human life in a uterus to die...
>and she goes as far as allowing you to kill that human life you wish
>would die.
>
>If you're logical then the same people who support Ginsberg's views are
>wishing human lives to be dead and making it happen a million times a
>year... why would it be evil for others to wish that same thing of her?
> Not that they actually want her dead they may just want her off the
>court. so society can get someone who is healthy and can do the job
>efficiently and with a clear mind.  Having the clerks do the job isn't
>the same as the Justice herself being able to do the work.
>
>I wonder if she thinks that the human life in a uterus is devoid of the
>same instincts that she has to stay alive as it struggles to gestate and
>is then violently attacked by a Liberal Doctor that she says has a RIGHT
>to deliberately kill a human life inside a uterus because the Liberal
>Doctor went to a medical school to become a killer? Where does the
>belief that human life is disposable?  I can certainly point out that
>the Marxists have that same view.
>
>If Ginsberg were true to her beliefs she'd have never had any medical
>procedures and she would have opted for a Liberal Doctor assisted
>suicide so that she wouldn't be a burden on the rest of society just as
>she says that a human life in the uterus can be killed by a Liberal
>Doctor to help the mother and society avoid the human life in the uterus
>being a burden to a person or society.
>
>Ginsberg should be thinking of those she might be impacting negatively,
>just as she thinks of the human life in the uterus (who just wants to
>live) but others decide it's more trouble than it's worth and Ginsberg
>should be willing to be put to the same test of whether her hanging on
>and using up medical supplies and costing tax payers is really worth the
>continuance of her human life.  If she agreed to an anonymous and random
>person deciding on her human life then she would at least be true to her
>conviction, but we see that she is hanging on to her human life with
>both hands while at the same time killing millions of others that are
>just as programmed in their DNA by nature to want to live.

Very well stated!!  Bravo!

__

"Journalists are extremely rare and shouldn’t be harmed, but propagandists are everywhere and should be hunted for sport"

Yeah..with no bag limit.




-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus